Arab women redefining cinema and TV: Panelists call for funding, genre diversity, equal creative power

“Her Narrative: Women Reimagining Arab Creativity” was a panel discussion that featured three trailblazing voices from the region — actor and producer Hend Sabry, filmmaker Tima Shomali, and Cinema Akil founder Butheina Kazim. (AN Photo)
Short Url
Updated 14 September 2025
Follow

Arab women redefining cinema and TV: Panelists call for funding, genre diversity, equal creative power

  • International Congress of Arabic and Creative Industries takes place until Sept. 15

ABU DHABI: The International Congress of Arabic and Creative Industries began at Abu Dhabi’s Etihad Arena on Sunday, exploring issues around the Arabic language and its place in culture and media.

“Her Narrative: Women Reimagining Arab Creativity” was a panel discussion that featured three trailblazing voices from the region — actor and producer Hend Sabry, filmmaker Tima Shomali, and Cinema Akil founder Butheina Kazim — who spoke on the evolving role of women in Arab cinema and television.

Sabry opened by noting that Arab women still face “the same challenges as before, but with more pressure,” especially when seeking financing or leadership roles. Yet she acknowledged clear progress, adding: “In the last 10 to 15 years, we’ve reached a decent place.”

She emphasized that women must continue to push for control of their narratives, whether as writers, producers, or directors, and urged more investment in female-driven projects.

Shomali highlighted the gains she sees behind the camera, pointing to the rise of women directors and the global success of her own Netflix hit “AlRawabi School for Girls.”

She also bemoaned the persistent need to “prove ourselves at every stage” and the subtle resistance experienced when women make authoritative creative decisions. Shomali said she deliberately hired mostly female department heads on her production, finding the collaboration “smooth and barrier-free,” and she championed opportunities for women in technical fields such as cinematography and sound design.

Kazim offered a historical lens, tracing women’s influence back to early Arab cinema pioneers like Egyptian actor and producer Aziza Amir and Lebanese Egyptian actor and producer Assia Dagher. She challenged the narrative of female exclusion, noting that women make up nearly half the Arab film workforce. For Kazim, independent cinema is a vital incubator for women’s stories and deserves sustained funding and festival support.

The panelists questioned and explored industry myths: that female-led films do not sell, and that television’s popularity among women is accidental. They cited examples like Nadine Labaki’s “Caramel” and the international reach of “AlRawabi School for Girls” to reject the claims. All three agreed that capital remains the central hurdle and that financiers still back men more readily, limiting women’s creative freedom.

Looking forward, Sabry called for more genre diversity, from science fiction to thrillers; Shomali urged a structured, collaborative Arab industry; and Kazim pressed for robust funding policies.

Kazim said: “If I must pick just one thing (as a future goal): more funding opportunities for women’s works at every level — commercial and independent. And perhaps we should be biased toward the alternative-independent sector. People think it’s a niche with a small audience and little importance but I believe the deepest lessons we are discussing come from independent cinema. 

“So, revive and support festivals and funding opportunities for alternative cinema here in the UAE and across the region in a healthy way so that they complement one another.”


Decoding villains at an Emirates LitFest panel in Dubai

Updated 25 January 2026
Follow

Decoding villains at an Emirates LitFest panel in Dubai

DUBAI: At this year’s Emirates Airline Festival of Literature in Dubai, a panel on Saturday titled “The Monster Next Door,” moderated by Shane McGinley, posed a question for the ages: Are villains born or made?

Novelists Annabel Kantaria, Louise Candlish and Ruth Ware, joined by a packed audience, dissected the craft of creating morally ambiguous characters alongside the social science that informs them. “A pure villain,” said Ware, “is chilling to construct … The remorselessness unsettles you — How do you build someone who cannot imagine another’s pain?”

Candlish described character-building as a gradual process of “layering over several edits” until a figure feels human. “You have to build the flesh on the bone or they will remain caricatures,” she added.

The debate moved quickly to the nature-versus-nurture debate. “Do you believe that people are born evil?” asked McGinley, prompting both laughter and loud sighs.

Candlish confessed a failed attempt to write a Tom Ripley–style antihero: “I spent the whole time coming up with reasons why my characters do this … It wasn’t really their fault,” she said, explaining that even when she tried to excise conscience, her character kept expressing “moral scruples” and second thoughts.

“You inevitably fold parts of yourself into your creations,” said Ware. “The spark that makes it come alive is often the little bit of you in there.”

Panelists likened character creation to Frankenstein work. “You take the irritating habit of that co‑worker, the weird couple you saw in a restaurant, bits of friends and enemies, and stitch them together,” said Ware.

But real-world perspective reframed the literary exercise in stark terms. Kantaria recounted teaching a prison writing class and quoting the facility director, who told her, “It’s not full of monsters. It’s normal people who made a bad decision.” She recalled being struck that many inmates were “one silly decision” away from the crimes that put them behind bars. “Any one of us could be one decision away from jail time,” she said.

The panelists also turned to scientific findings through the discussion. Ware cited infant studies showing babies prefer helpers to hinderers in puppet shows, suggesting “we are born with a natural propensity to be attracted to good.”

Candlish referenced twin studies and research on narrative: People who can form a coherent story about trauma often “have much better outcomes,” she explained.

“Both things will end up being super, super neat,” she said of genes and upbringing, before turning to the redemptive power of storytelling: “When we can make sense of what happened to us, we cope better.”

As the session closed, McGinley steered the panel away from tidy answers. Villainy, the authors agreed, is rarely the product of an immutable core; more often, it is assembled from ordinary impulses, missteps and circumstances. For writers like Kantaria, Candlish and Ware, the task is not to excuse cruelty but “to understand the fragile architecture that holds it together,” and to ask readers to inhabit uncomfortable but necessary perspectives.