Coalition launched to push for UN override of US vetoes protecting Israel

Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein talks to a reporter at an election watch party at the Dearborn Banquet Hall in Dearborn, Michigan on November 5, 2024. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 06 September 2025
Follow

Coalition launched to push for UN override of US vetoes protecting Israel

  • ‘Uniting for Peace’ mechanism can circumvent Security Council’s failure to act, ex-UN official tells webinar attended by Arab News
  • Support for Palestine must ‘not fade in the face of incredible US and Israeli opposition,’ says ex-presidential candidate

Chicago: A campaign was launched on Friday to push the UN to impose sanctions on Israel and override American vetoes that protect the country at the Security Council.

The Lifeline for Palestine coalition, led by former US presidential candidate Dr. Jill Stein, is backed by leading pro-Palestinian activists and groups. 

During a webinar attended by Arab News, Stein and former UN human rights official Craig Mokhiber explained how the organization’s member states have the legal authority to circumvent the Security Council and impose sanctions on Israel, suspend its membership, impose an arms embargo, and assign a UN peacekeeping force to Gaza and the West Bank.

Mokhiber, who served 30 years with the UN, said Israel’s actions in Gaza far exceed the violence and oppression of apartheid South Africa.

He added that UN member states “have the power” under a 1950s resolution called “Uniting for Peace” to circumvent the Security Council’s failure to act.

“The world doesn’t have to surrender to a US veto in the Security Council. The UN General Assembly is empowered when it meets to convene under ‘Uniting for Peace.’ There are historical precedents for doing so, and they can take extraordinary action,” Mokhiber said, adding that the UNGA needs a two-thirds majority to act, or 127 of its 193 members.

Last year, 124 nations approved a resolution demanding Israel withdraw from Gaza and the West Bank by Sept. 28, 2025.

In the face of a Security Council veto or failure to act, “any member state can then call for an emergency special session of the General Assembly under ‘Uniting for Peace,’” said Mokhiber.

“A resolution can be proposed … it can be adopted with a two-thirds majority, then the UN can start soliciting troop contributions from member states to participate and deploy troops.”

Stein said pro-Palestine activists “have the power right now to end the genocide” in Gaza. “The essential pieces of a strong resolution are establishing a military embargo and comprehensive sanctions … stripping Israel’s UN credentials as was done to apartheid South Africa in the General Assembly, and then establishing a war crimes tribunal and anti-apartheid mechanisms,” she added.

“It’s time for us to demand that support for Palestine be maintained and that it not fade in the face of incredible US and Israeli opposition, intimidation, threats and bribes.”

The webinar’s participants criticized the US denial of visas to Palestinian leaders to attend the UNGA’s 80th session in New York later this month.

When the same thing happened in 1988, “the entire General Assembly voted to pick up and move to Geneva in order to express its sovereignty, (declaring that) no single member state will dictate to it,” said Ali Abunimah, a Palestinian-American journalist and co-founder of The Electronic Intifada website.

He added that UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has failed to challenge last week’s US decision to deny entry to Palestinian leaders.

The coalition will convene a follow-up webinar on Sunday. Its website is www.lifelineforpalestine.com.


House votes to slap back Trump’s tariffs on Canada in rare bipartisan rebuke

Updated 12 February 2026
Follow

House votes to slap back Trump’s tariffs on Canada in rare bipartisan rebuke

WASHINGTON: The House voted Wednesday to slap back President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canada, a rare if largely symbolic rebuke of the White House agenda as Republicans joined Democrats over the objections of GOP leadership.
The tally, 219-211, was among the first times the House, controlled by Republicans, has confronted the president over a signature policy, and drew instant recrimination from Trump himself. The resolution seeks to end the national emergency Trump declared to impose the tariffs, though actually undoing the policy would require support from the president, which is highly unlikely. It next goes to the Senate.
Trump believes in the power of tariffs to force US trade partners to the negotiating table. But lawmakers are facing unrest back home from businesses caught in the trade wars and constituents navigating pocketbook issues and high prices.
“Today’s vote is simple, very simple: Will you vote to lower the cost of living for the American family or will you keep prices high out of loyalty to one person — Donald J. Trump?” said Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who authored the resolution.
Within minutes, as the gavel struck, Trump fired off a stern warning to those in the Republican Party who would dare to cross him.
“Any Republican, in the House or the Senate, that votes against TARIFFS will seriously suffer the consequences come Election time, and that includes Primaries!” the president posted on social media.
The high-stakes moment provides a snapshot of the House’s unease with the president’s direction, especially ahead of the midterm elections as economic issues resonate among voters. The Senate has already voted to reject Trump’s tariffs on Canada and other countries in a show of displeasure. But both chambers would have to approve the tariff rollbacks, and send the resolution to Trump for the president’s signature — or veto.
Six House Republicans voted for the resolution, and one Democrat voted against it.
From Canada, Ontario, Premier Doug Ford on social media called the vote “an important victory with more work ahead.” He thanked lawmakers from both parties “who stood up in support of free trade and economic growth between our two great countries. Let’s end the tariffs and together build a more prosperous and secure future.”
Trump recently threatened to impose a 100 percent tariff on goods imported from Canada over that country’s proposed China trade deal, intensifying a feud with the longtime US ally and Prime Minister Mark Carney.
GOP defections forced the vote
House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to prevent this showdown.
Johnson insisted lawmakers wait for a pending Supreme Court ruling in a lawsuit about the tariffs. He engineered a complicated rules change to prevent floor action. But Johnson’s strategy collapsed late Tuesday, as Republicans peeled off during a procedural vote to ensure the Democratic measure was able to advance.
“The president’s trade policies have been of great benefit,” Johnson, R-Louisiana, had said. “And I think the sentiment is that we allow a little more runway for this to be worked out between the executive branch and the judicial branch.”
Late Tuesday evening, Johnson could be seen speaking to holdout Republican lawmakers as the GOP leadership team struggled to shore up support during a lengthy procedural vote, but the numbers lined up against him.
“We’re disappointed,” Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House’s National Economic Council, told reporters at the White House on Wednesday morning. “The president will make sure they don’t repeal his tariffs.”
Terminating Trump’s emergency
The resolution put forward by Meeks would terminate the national emergency that Trump declared a year ago as one of his executive orders.
The administration claimed illicit drug flow from Canada constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat that allows the president to slap tariffs on imported goods outside the terms of the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement.
The Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, said the flow of fentanyl into the US is a dire national emergency and the policy must be left in place.
“Let’s be clear again about what this resolution is and what it’s not. It’s not a debate about tariffs. You can talk about those, but that’s not really what it is,” Mast said. “This is Democrats trying to ignore that there is a fentanyl crisis.”
Experts say fentanyl produced by cartels in Mexico is largely smuggled into the US from land crossings in California and Arizona. Fentanyl is also made in Canada and smuggled into the US, but to a much lesser extent.
Torn between Trump and tariffs
Ahead of voting, some rank-and-file Republican lawmakers expressed unease over the choices ahead as Democrats — and a few renegade Republicans — impressed on their colleagues the need to flex their power as the legislative branch rather than ceding so much power to the president to take authority over trade and tariff policy.
Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, said he was unpersuaded by Johnson’s call to wait until the Supreme Court makes its decision about the legality of Trump’s tariffs. He voted for passage.
“Why doesn’t the Congress stand on its own two feet and say that we’re an independent branch?” Bacon said. “We should defend our authorities. I hope the Supreme Court does, but if we don’t do it, shame on us.”
Bacon, who is retiring rather than facing reelection, also argued that tariffs are bad economic policy.
Other Republicans had to swiftly make up their minds after Johnson’s gambit — which would have paused the calendar days to prevent the measure from coming forward — was turned back.
“At the end of the day, we’re going to have to support our president,” said Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas.
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said he doesn’t want to tie the president’s hands on trade and would support the tariffs on Canada “at this time.”