PM alleges ‘foreign hands’ in terror attacks, cites $152 billion economic losses to Pakistan

Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif, addresses the 25th SCO Heads of States Council Meeting in Tianjin, China, on September 1, 2025. (Government of Pakistan)
Short Url
Updated 01 September 2025
Follow

PM alleges ‘foreign hands’ in terror attacks, cites $152 billion economic losses to Pakistan

  • Shehbaz Sharif said this while addressing 25th SCO Council of Heads of State summit in China’s Tianjin city
  • SCO members condemn Pahalgam, Jaffar Express train attacks, seek accountability of perpetrators, sponsors

ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Monday alleged Islamabad had irrefutable evidence of the involvement of “foreign hands” in terror attacks in Pakistan, in a veiled reference to India, alleging the country has suffered $152 billion in economic losses as a result.

The Pakistani prime minister was addressing the Shanghai Cooperation Organization’s (SCO) two-day Council of Heads of State (CHS) summit in Tianjin, China. The SCO summit saw participation from member states such as Russia, India, Central Asian countries and others, who seek greater regional connectivity and economic cooperation.

This was the first time Sharif had attended a regional summit with his Indian counterpart, Narendra Modi, after Pakistan’s brief military confrontation with India in May. Islamabad has blamed New Delhi for supporting militant attacks in Pakistan, including an attack on the Jaffar Express train in Balochistan in March. Fighters belonging to the separatist Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) had stormed the train with hundreds of passengers on board and took them hostage.

The military rescued them after an hours-long operation that left 33 militants, 23 soldiers, three railway staff and five passengers dead.

“We have, ladies and gentlemen, irrefutable evidence of the involvement of some foreign hands in the devastating Jaffar Express train hostage incident, as well as countless other terrorist attacks against us in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan,” Sharif said during his address.

Sharif said Pakistan has rendered “great sacrifices” in its battle against militancy, saying it has lost over 90,000 lives to various attacks over the years.

“[Pakistan] has endured economic losses over $152 billion, a sacrifice which has no parallel in the annals of history,” the Pakistani premier said.

He said Islamabad supports and respects the sovereignty and integrity of all SCO member states and its neighbors.

“We respect all international and bilateral treaties and expect similar principles to be followed by all SCO members,” Sharif said in another veiled reference to India.

Delhi announced following an attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on Apr. 22 that it was holding the Indus Waters Treaty, which governs the use of the Indus River system between India and Pakistan, in abeyance. Delhi announced the move as ties deteriorated between the nuclear-armed nations after it held Pakistan responsible for the April militant attack that killed 26. Pakistan denies having a hand in the attack.

“Pakistan seeks normal and stable relationship with all its neighbors. It seeks dialogue and diplomacy over conflict and confrontation,” the Pakistani premier said.

He reiterated Islamabad’s demand for a comprehensive dialogue to resolve all outstanding disputes in the region.

The May fighting between India and Pakistan was the worst between the two neighbors since 1999. The militaries of the two countries pounded each other with fighter jets, drones, missiles and artillery fire before US President Donald Trump brokered a ceasefire on May 10.

The fragile ceasefire continues to remain in place, but tensions remain high.




Pakistan’s Prime Minister, Shehbaz Sharif, pictured at the Tianjin Meijang Convention Center upon his arrival to attent the welcome banquet organized in honor of the world leaders participating in the 25th SCO Heads of States Council Meeting in Tianjin, China, on August 31, 2025. (Government of Pakistan)

PAHALGAM, JAFFAR EXPRESS TRAIN ATTACKS

In a joint declaration issued later, the SCO member states condemned militant attacks in Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir, which killed 26 tourists on April 22, as well as the hijacking of the Jaffar Express passenger train and the Khuzdar school bus bombing in Pakistan this year. Islamabad blamed the attacks on Indian-sponsored militarnt groups, an allegation denied by New Delhi.

The SCO members expressed their sympathy and condolences to the families of those killed and injured, and called for the accountability of the perpetrators, organizers and sponsors of such attacks.

“Member States strongly condemn terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, emphasize that double standards in the fight against terrorism are unacceptable, and call upon the international community to combat terrorism, including the cross-border movement of terrorists,” the declaration read.

Pakistan and India routinely accuse each other of supporting militant groups waging attacks against the other. The two countries have fought multiple wars, including two of them over the disputed region of Kashmir, since their independence from British rule in 1947. Both rule the region in part but claim it in full.


Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

Updated 57 min 11 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

  • Top court orders lower court to pause proceedings after lawyers allege due-process breaches
  • Mazari-Hazir, husband face charges under cybercrime law that carry up to 14 years in prison

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday halted the cybercrime trial of prominent human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after their lawyers argued that a lower court had recorded witness testimony in their absence, violating due-process rules.

Mazari-Hazir, one of Pakistan’s most outspoken civil liberties lawyers, and Chattha are being prosecuted under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over posts on X that authorities say incited ethnic divisions and portrayed the military as involved in “terrorism.” Both reject the allegations. If convicted under the relevant PECA provision, they face a prison term of up to 14 years.

The case has drawn broad attention in Pakistan’s legal community because Mazari-Hazir, who has been repeatedly detained over her criticism of the security establishment, argues that the trial court ignored basic procedural guarantees despite her medical leave request. The case also comes as Pakistan faces sustained scrutiny over the use of PECA against activists, journalists and political dissenters, with lawyers arguing that lower courts often move ahead without meeting minimum fair-trial standards.

The couple’s lawyer, Riasat Ali Azad, said his clients filed a petition in the Supreme Court because the lower court had moved ahead improperly.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has stayed the lower court proceedings, the trial court proceedings and has said that the [Islamabad] High Court should decide our pending revision petition for which a date has already been fixed,” he told reporters.

Azad said the violation was clear under Pakistan’s Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires evidence to be recorded in the presence of the accused.

“Yet, on that very day, evidence of four witnesses was recorded in their absence, and a state counsel was appointed to conduct cross-examination on their behalf,” he said. “All these things are against the right to a fair trial under Articles 10 and 10-A.”

A three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ordered the trial court to pause proceedings and instructed the Islamabad High Court to hear the couple’s pending criminal revision petition first.

The trial had been scheduled to resume on Dec.15, but the Supreme Court’s stay now freezes proceedings before both the additional sessions judge and the special PECA court. 

The Islamabad High Court is expected to hear the criminal revision petition next week.

Chattha, who is also a lawyer, said the SC ruling underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

“It is a victory for the constitution and the law,” he said, arguing that the trial court had ignored their request to re-record witness statements in their presence.