Rohingya refugees in India decry ‘inhumane’ deportation to Myanmar 

Rohingya refugees stand at a makeshift camp on the outskirts of Jammu, India in 2021. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 30 August 2025
Follow

Rohingya refugees in India decry ‘inhumane’ deportation to Myanmar 

  • An estimated 40,000 Rohingya live in India, over 20,000 of whom are registered with UNHCR
  • UN expert, HRW said Indian authorities have deported scores of Rohingya refugees since May

NEW DELHI: After more than a decade of living in India as a refugee, 55-year-old Nobel Hussain — whose real name has not been used due to concerns over his safety — was among dozens of Rohingya who were forced off an Indian naval vessel into the Andaman Sea in May, amid a crackdown on “illegal immigrants” that has seen hundreds being unlawfully forced out of India. 

Hussain said he and his wife were detained in New Delhi along with at least 40 other Rohingya refugees. After being forced onto a military plane and flown to another location, they were forced onto a naval vessel and cast into the sea near Myanmar.

“It was 4 a.m., we were asked to put on life jackets, our legs and hands were tied, and we were put (into) boats,” he told Arab News. ”After some time, they untied us and threw us in the sea. We had to swim for 30 minutes before we saw land and were rescued by the locals.” 

Hussain and his wife, who are both registered with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, have been living in hiding ever since and face an uncertain future in Myanmar — a country they fled years ago in fear for their lives. 

“We don’t have any documents. Myanmar is always attacking our area. My wife, who has cancer, has sleepless nights. We live in constant fear and don’t know what will happen to us when we are caught,” he said. 

“What the Indian government did to us is inhumane … We thought that we had escaped the danger when we landed in India in 2013, but the Indian government has brought us back to the same predators we thought we escaped.” 

India’s Ministry of Home Affairs did not respond to Arab News’ request for comment. 

Tom Andrews, UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in Myanmar, started a probe in May into what it called “unconscionable, unacceptable acts,” following “credible reports” of Indian authorities rounding up Rohingya refugees and expelling them, which included the case of the Rohingya refugee group of which Hussain was a part. 

A report by Human Rights Watch published on Friday stated that Indian authorities have deported more than 200 ethnic Rohingya refugees to Bangladesh and Myanmar since May 2025, while hundreds of others have been arbitrarily detained. 

India does not have a national policy or a law on the status and treatment of refugees. It is also not a signatory to the 1951 Refugee Convention, which outlines the rights of refugees and the legal obligations of states to protect them.

Most Rohingya refugees fled Myanmar in 2017, when its military launched a brutal crackdown — widely regarded as ethnic cleansing — on Rohingya Muslims in western Rakhine State. 

While most of them sought safety in neighboring Bangladesh, many also escaped to Hindu-majority India, where an estimated 40,000 now live, more than 20,000 of whom are registered with the UNHCR. 

The increasing crackdown against Rohingya in India appears to be part of a broader campaign led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party, which has been expelling the persecuted minority and Bengali-speaking Muslims for being “illegal immigrants,” HRW said. 

One Rohingya refugee living in Delhi, who asked not to be identified, said his brother was in the same group as Hussain. In early May, he and others were taken to the local police station under the guise of collecting biometric data, but were later detained by authorities. 

Since then, he has only managed a single brief call with his brother, who is also registered with the UNHCR and had lived in Delhi since 2017. 

“My brother and others escaped the brutal Myanmar army to save their lives. The Indian government has pushed them into the hands of the same predator … What is our crime? We don’t want to live in India but we are persecuted in our country. Such arbitrary detention breaks the family, it brings the unimaginable pain of separation and utter helplessness,” the man told Arab News. ”We want India to show some humanity. We are not illegal. We are registered with the UNHCR and want to live like refugees with respect.”

Sabber Kyaw Min, founder of Delhi-based NGO Rohingya Human Rights Initiative, said the deportations of Rohingya are a “violation” of the Indian constitution. 

“Myanmar is not safe for Rohingya. To send refugees back to the same place where they are under attack is not on par with humanitarian law and human values. There are so many other refugees, like Afghans, Africans and others, who are living in India,” he told Arab News. “Why is India targeting Rohingya? 

“We don’t want to criticize India. India should show humanity towards the women, children and unfortunate people of Rohingya,” he continued. 

While Indian policy has historically been in favor of refugees, activist Priyali Suri of the Azadi Project, an NGO that works for refugees, said the government’s approach to refugees has changed in the last decade. 

“India has never been a signatory of the Refugee Convention, but we have welcomed refugees in our land. We have welcomed Sri Lankan refugees, we’ve welcomed Tibetan refugees, we’ve welcomed Afghan refugees, refugees who’ve made this their home,” she told Arab News. 

“It is very sad, and rather infuriating, that human beings who are already persecuted, who are fearing for their lives, have been deported in such a merciless manner. These deportations are clearly a political message that this current establishment stands for a certain kind of political ideology that does not support human rights, does not support refugee rights, and does not adhere to international conventions.” 


Afghan barbers under pressure as morality police take on short beards

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Afghan barbers under pressure as morality police take on short beards

KABUL: Barbers in Afghanistan risk detention for trimming men’s beards too short, they told AFP, as the Taliban authorities enforce their strict interpretation of Islamic law with increasing zeal.
Last month, the Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice said it was now “obligatory” to grow beards longer than a fist, doubling down on an earlier order.
Minister Khalid Hanafi said it was the government’s “responsibility to guide the nation to have an appearance according to sharia,” or Islamic law.
Officials tasked with promoting virtue “are obliged to implement the Islamic system,” he said.
With ministry officials patrolling city streets to ensure the rule is followed, the men interviewed by AFP all spoke on condition of anonymity due to security concerns.
In the southeastern province of Ghazni, a 30-year-old barber said he was detained for three nights after officials found out that one of his employees had given a client a Western-style haircut.
“First, I was held in a cold hall. Later, after I insisted on being released, they transferred me to a cold (shipping) container,” he said.
He was eventually released without charge and continues to work, but usually hides with his clients when the patrols pass by.
“The thing is that no one can argue or question” the ministry officials, the barber said.
“Everyone fears them.”
He added that in some cases where both a barber and clients were detained, “the clients have been let out, but they kept the barber” in custody.
Last year, three barbers in Kunar province were jailed for three to five months for breaching the ministry’s rules, according to a UN report.

‘Personal space’

Alongside the uptick in enforcement, the religious affairs ministry has also issued stricter orders.
In an eight-page guide to imams issued in November, prayer leaders were told to describe shaving beards as a “major sin” in their sermons.
The religious affairs ministry’s arguments against trimming state that by shaving their beards, men were “trying to look like women.”
The orders have also reached universities — where only men study because women have been banned.
A 22-year-old Kabul University student said lecturers “have warned us... that if we don’t have a proper Islamic appearance, which includes beards and head covering, they will deduct our marks.”
In the capital Kabul, a 25-year-old barber lamented that “there are a lot of restrictions” which go against his young clients’ preference for closer shaves.
“Barbers are private businesses, beards and heads are something personal, they should be able to cut the way they want,” he said.
Hanafi, the virtue propagation minister, has dismissed such arguments, saying last month that telling men “to grow a beard according to sharia” cannot be considered “invading the personal space.”

Business slump

In Afghanistan, the majority are practicing Muslims, but before the Taliban authorities returned to power in 2021, residents of major cities could choose their own appearance.
In areas where Taliban fighters were battling US-backed forces, men would grow beards either out of fear or by choice.
As fewer and fewer men opt for a close shave, the 25-year-old Kabul barber said he was already losing business.
Many civil servants, for example, “used to sort their hair a couple of times a week, but now, most of them have grown beards, they don’t show up even in a month,” he said.
A 50-year-old barber in Kabul said morality patrols “visit and check every day.”
In one incident this month, the barber said that an officer came into the shop and asked: “Why did you cut the hair like this?“
“After trying to explain that he is a child, he told us: ‘No, do Islamic hair, not English hair’.”