India to probe giant zoo run by son of Asia’s richest person

Above, Anant Ambani on the day of his wedding with Radhika Merchant in Mumbai, India in July 12, 2024. The zoo was among the many venues for Ambani’s lavish multi-day wedding celebrations. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 26 August 2025
Follow

India to probe giant zoo run by son of Asia’s richest person

  • Vantara, which bills itself as the ‘world’s biggest wild animal rescue center,’ is run by Anant Ambani
  • Wildlife activists have criticized the facility, saying it is housing endangered species on baking flatlands

NEW DELHI: India’s Supreme Court has ordered an investigation into allegations of illegal animal imports and financial misconduct at a vast private zoo set up by the son of Asia’s richest person.

Vantara, which bills itself as the “world’s biggest wild animal rescue center,” is run by Anant Ambani, son of Mukesh Ambani, the billionaire head of the multinational conglomerate Reliance Industries.

The site in the western state of Gujarat is home to more than 200 elephants, as well as 50 bears, 160 tigers, 200 lions, 250 leopards and 900 crocodiles, among other animals, according to India’s Central Zoo Authority.

Wildlife activists have criticized the facility, saying it is housing endangered species on baking flatlands next to a giant oil refinery complex without any plan to return them to the wild.

And on Monday, India’s Supreme Court said it had ordered a panel led by retired judges to investigate alleged unlawful acquisition of animals – particularly elephants – other violations of wildlife regulations, and money laundering.

“We consider it appropriate... to call for an independent factual appraisal,” the court said.

It added that the team will also assess whether Gujarat’s harsh climate is unsuitable for the animals, and “complaints regarding creation of a vanity or private collection.”

The court said it issued the order after petitions based on media reports and complaints by wildlife organizations.

In March, the German newspaper Suddeutsche Zeitung reported that Vantara imported roughly 39,000 animals in 2024, including from the Democratic Republic of Congo, the United Arab Emirates and Venezuela.

Dozens of the facility’s elephants were transported there in specially adapted trucks thousands of kilometers from across India, according to the zoo.

Vantara said in a statement on Tuesday that it would extend “full cooperation” to the investigation team and “remains committed to transparency, compassion and full compliance with the law.”

“Our mission and focus continues to be the rescue, rehabilitation and care of animals,” it said.

The zoo was among the many venues for Anant Ambani’s lavish multi-day wedding celebrations in 2024, which set a new benchmark in matrimonial extravagance with private performances by pop stars Rihanna, Justin Bieber and Katy Perry.


Austrian parliament approves headscarf ban in schools

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

Austrian parliament approves headscarf ban in schools

  • In 2019 the country introduced a ban on headscarves in primary schools, but the constitutional court struck it down
  • Rights groups and activists have long argued that banning headscarves still amounts to telling a woman what to wear
VIENNA: Austrian lawmakers on Thursday voted by a large majority in favor of a law banning headscarves in schools for girls under 14, a move rights groups and experts say is discriminatory and could deepen societal division.
Austria’s conservative-led government — under pressure with anti-immigration sentiment is running high — proposed the ban earlier this year, arguing it is aimed at protecting girls “from oppression.”
In 2019 the country introduced a ban on headscarves in primary schools, but the constitutional court struck it down.
This time the government insists that its law is constitutional, though experts have suggested it could be seen as discriminating against one religion — Islam — and putting children in an uncomfortable position.
The law prevents girls younger than 14 from wearing headscarves that “cover the head in accordance with Islamic traditions” in all schools.
After a debate Thursday, only the opposition Green party voted against the ban.
Ahead of the vote, lawmaker Yannick Shetty of the liberal NEOS said the headscarf “is not just an item of clothing” but “sexualizes girls.”
“When a girl... is told that she must hide her body... to protect herself from the gaze of men, it’s not a religious ritual, but oppression,” Integration Minister Claudia Plakolm said when presenting the bill.
The ban, which applies to “all forms” of the Islamic veil including hijabs and burqas, would take full effect with the start of the new school year in September, Plakolm said.
From February, an initial period would be launched during which the new rules would be explained to educators, parents and children with no penalties for breaking them.
But for repeated non-compliance, parents would face fines ranging from €150 to €800 ($175-930).
The government said that about 12,000 girls would be affected by the new law.
‘Stigmatized’
Rights groups and activists have long argued that banning headscarves still amounts to telling a woman what to wear, instead of allowing her the freedom to decide on her own.
Organizations including Amnesty International Austria have criticized the bill.
Amnesty said it “constitutes blatant discrimination against Muslim girls” and described it as an “expression of anti-Muslim racism.”
Such measures risk “fueling existing prejudices and stereotypes against Muslims,” the group warned.
The draft law has also drawn criticism from the IGGOe, the body officially recognized as representing the country’s Muslim communities.
It said the ban “jeopardizes social cohesion,” saying “instead of empowering children, they are stigmatized and marginalized.”
Angelika Atzinger, managing director of the Amazone women’s rights association, said a headscarf ban “sends girls the message that decisions are being made about their bodies and that this is legitimate.”
Her comments appeared in a statement published by the anti-racism group SOS Mitmensch, which also opposes the proposed law.
Austria’s anti-immigration, far-right Freedom Party (FPOe) said the ban did not go far enough, however. They want it extended to all students, teachers and other staff.
In France, authorities banned school children in 2004 from wearing signs of religious affiliation such as headscarves, turbans or Jewish skullcaps, on the basis of the country’s secular laws, which are meant to guarantee neutrality in state institutions.