Gaza journalist Motaz Azaiza reunites with Nada Jwaifel, survivor from iconic photo

The photo, which showed Nada Jwaifel trapped under the rubble of her destroyed home at Al-Nuseirat refugee camp, helped spark the global outpouring of support. (Instagram: motaz_azaiza)
Short Url
Updated 20 August 2025
Follow

Gaza journalist Motaz Azaiza reunites with Nada Jwaifel, survivor from iconic photo

  • Israel airstrike had severely injured Jwaifel, killed 7 siblings and grandmother
  • Jwaifel, 19, blasts Tel Aviv for taking ‘everything precious,’ but ‘never break my spirit’

LONDON: Almost two years after capturing the iconic image of Nada Jwaifel that became one of Time magazine’s Top 10 photos of 2023, Palestinian journalist Motaz Azaiza has reunited with the young woman who was pulled from the rubble of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza.

Azaiza met Jwaifel, 19, this week in Washington D.C., where she is receiving medical treatment.

The photo, which showed her trapped under the rubble of her destroyed home at Al-Nuseirat refugee camp, helped spark the global outpouring of support and mobilize the urgent medical intervention that saved her life.

Azaiza had been documenting the work of Gaza’s Civil Defense teams in late October 2023 when he found Jwaifel buried beneath the remains of an eight-story building flattened by an Israeli airstrike. Seven of her siblings and her grandmother were killed in the attack.

“It was the light from my camera flash that discovered her,” Azaiza said in an earlier Instagram post.

 

 

Jwaifel was critically injured, with her legs pinned under concrete. Doctors had warned that immediate amputation would be necessary unless urgent treatment was secured.

When the photo gained global attention, the Palestine Children’s Relief Fund quickly launched efforts to evacuate her for treatment abroad.

Following 75 surgeries across four countries, Jwaifel eventually underwent a complex 16-hour nerve and muscle transplant at Johns Hopkins Hospital in the US that saved her legs from amputation.

“It’s painful to be in her place. It’s painful to see her,” Azaiza said in a previous interview with Time magazine.

“She’s so lucky she survived. What about people who, there was no hole for me to see them and they (were) still stuck under the rubble and they passed with no help.”

Now able to walk again, Jwaifel joined Azaiza at a PCRF event in Washington, where she spoke of her journey.

“Israel might have taken everything precious to me — my family, my home, my peace — but it will never never break my spirit, as long as I can breathe.”


BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

Updated 16 December 2025
Follow

BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

LONDON: The BBC said Tuesday it would fight a $10-billion lawsuit brought by US President Donald Trump against the British broadcaster over a documentary that edited his 2021 speech ahead of the US Capitol riot.
“As we have made clear previously, we will be defending this case,” a BBC spokesperson said in a statement sent to AFP, adding the company would not be making “further comment on ongoing legal proceedings.”
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Miami, seeks “damages in an amount not less than $5,000,000,000” for each of two counts against the British broadcaster, for alleged defamation and violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
The video that triggered the lawsuit spliced together two separate sections of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021 in a way that made it appear he explicitly urged supporters to attack the Capitol, where lawmakers were certifying Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.
The lawsuit comes as the UK government on Tuesday launched the politically sensitive review of the BBC’s Royal Charter, which outlines the corporation’s funding and governance and needs to be renewed in 2027.
As part of the review, it launched a public consultation on issues including the role of “accuracy” in the BBC’s mission and contentious reforms to the corporation’s funding model, which currently relies on a mandatory fee for anyone in the country who watches television.
Minister Stephen Kinnock stressed after the lawsuit was filed that the UK government “is a massive supporter of the BBC.”
The BBC has “been very clear that there is no case to answer in terms of Mr.Trump’s accusation on the broader point of libel or defamation. I think it’s right the BBC stands firm on that point,” Kinnock told Sky News on Tuesday.
Trump, 79, had said the lawsuit was imminent, claiming the BBC had “put words in my mouth,” even positing that “they used AI or something.”
The documentary at issue aired last year before the 2024 election, on the BBC’s “Panorama” flagship current affairs program.

Apology letter 

“The formerly respected and now disgraced BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally, maliciously, and deceptively doctoring his speech in a brazen attempt to interfere in the 2024 Presidential Election,” a spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said in a statement to AFP.
“The BBC has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda,” the statement added.
The British Broadcasting Corporation, whose audience extends well beyond the United Kingdom, faced a period of turmoil last month after a media report brought renewed attention to the edited clip.
The scandal led the BBC director general, Tim Davie, and the organization’s top news executive, Deborah Turness, to resign.
Trump’s lawsuit says the edited speech in the documentary was “fabricated and aired by the Defendants one week before the 2024 Presidential Election in a brazen attempt to interfere in and influence the Election’s outcome to President Trump’s detriment.”
The BBC has denied Trump’s claims of legal defamation, though BBC chairman Samir Shah has sent Trump a letter of apology.
Shah also told a UK parliamentary committee last month the broadcaster should have acted sooner to acknowledge its mistake after the error was disclosed in a memo, which was leaked to The Daily Telegraph newspaper.
The BBC lawsuit is the latest in a string of legal actions Trump has taken against media companies in recent years, several of which have led to multi-million-dollar settlements.