Pakistan’s defense minister rejects Indian claim of downing six jets, says no aircraft lost

Pakistan Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif speaks during an interview with Arab News in Islamabad on June 17, 2025. (AN Photo/File)
Short Url
Updated 09 August 2025
Follow

Pakistan’s defense minister rejects Indian claim of downing six jets, says no aircraft lost

  • Indian air chief says five Pakistani fighters and a surveillance plane were destroyed in May clashes
  • Khawaja Asif says wars are won through professional competence, not by such fabrications

ISLAMABAD: Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif on Saturday rejected the Indian air chief’s assertion his country shot down six Pakistani military aircraft during a standoff between the nuclear-armed neighbors, saying no Pakistani aircraft was hit and adding that wars are won through professional competence, not fabrications.

Indian Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh told a gathering in New Delhi earlier today his country had downed five Pakistani fighter jets and one large surveillance plane in “the largest ever recorded surface-to-air kill” at a range of 300 kilometers. Singh’s assertion was the first such statement by India months after its worst military conflict in decades with its neighbor.

India targeted what it called “terrorist infrastructure” inside Pakistan earlier this year in May, calling it Operation Sindoor and saying it was in response to a gun attack in Indian-administered Kashmir which it blamed on Pakistan. Islamabad denied any involvement and called for an impartial international probe into the incident.

Pakistan said during the intense, four-day standoff it had shot down six Indian fighter jets, including French-made Rafales, right at the outset of the war. It also gave a technical briefing to the foreign media on how the situation unfolded at the outset of the conflict.

“Not a single Pakistani aircraft was hit or destroyed by Indian,” the minister said in a social media post on X. “Pakistan destroyed 6 Indian jets, S400 air defense batteries and unmanned aircraft of India while swiftly putting several Indian air bases out of action.”

He called it ironic that senior Indian military officials were “used as the faces of monumental failure caused by strategic shortsightedness of Indian politicians,” pointing out that for three months, no such claims were voiced by New Delhi.

He said if the truth was in question, both sides should open their aircraft inventories to independent verification.

“Wars are not won by falsehoods but by moral authority, national resolve and professional competence,” the minister said. “Such comical narratives, crafted for domestic political expediency, increase the grave risks of strategic miscalculation in a nuclearised environment.”

Asif warned that, as demonstrated during his country’s response to India, every violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity would invite a “swift, surefire and proportionate response,” adding that responsibility for any ensuing escalation would rest entirely with “strategically blind leaders who gamble with South Asia’s peace for fleeting political gains.”

India has previously acknowledged some losses, with its Chief of Defense Staff Anil Chauhan saying in an interview with Bloomberg that his forces had made a “tactical mistake” during the May conflict, but denying that six aircraft were lost.

Responding to a question, Chauhan said it was not important how many Indian planes were downed in the war.

“The good part is we were able to understand the tactical mistake which we made, remedy it, rectify it and then implement it again after two days and flew all our jets, again targeting at long range,” he said.

Separately, France’s air chief, General Jerome Bellanger, has said he has seen evidence of the loss of three Indian fighters, including a Rafale.

The Indian Air Force has not commented on the claims.

With input from Reuters


Imran Khan not a ‘national security threat,’ ex-PM’s party responds to Pakistan military

Updated 06 December 2025
Follow

Imran Khan not a ‘national security threat,’ ex-PM’s party responds to Pakistan military

  • Pakistan’s military spokesperson on Friday described Khan’s anti-army narrative as a “national security threat”
  • PTI Chairman Gohar Ali Khan says words used by military spokesperson for Khan were “not appropriate”

ISLAMABAD: Former prime minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party on Saturday responded to allegations by Pakistan military spokesperson Lt. Gen. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry from a day earlier, saying that he was not a “national security threat.”

Chaudhry, who heads the military’s media wing as director general of the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), spoke to journalists on Friday, in which he referred to Khan as a “mentally ill” person several times during the press interaction. Chaudhry described Khan’s anti-army narrative as a “national security threat.”

The military spokesperson was responding to Khan’s social media post this week in which he accused Chief of Defense Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir of being responsible for “the complete collapse of the constitution and rule of law in Pakistan.” 

“The people of Pakistan stand with Imran Khan, they stand with PTI,” the party’s secretary-general, Salman Akram Raja, told reporters during a news conference. 

“Imran Khan is not a national security threat. Imran Khan has kept the people of this country united.”

Raja said there were several narratives in the country, including those that created tensions along ethnic and sectarian lines, but Khan had rejected all of them and stood with one that the people of Pakistan supported. 

PTI Chairman Gohar Ali Khan, flanked by Raja, criticized the military spokesperson as well, saying his press talk on Thursday had “severely disappointed” him. 

“The words that were used [by the military spokesperson] were not appropriate,” Gohar said. “Those words were wrong.”

NATURAL OUTCOME’

Speaking to reporters earlier on Saturday, Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif defended the military spokesperson’s remarks against Khan.

“When this kind of language is used for individuals as well as for institutions, then a reaction is a natural outcome,” he said. 

“The same thing is happening on the Twitter accounts being run in his [Khan’s] name. If the DG ISPR has given any reaction to it, then I believe it was a very measured reaction.”

Khan, who was ousted after a parliamentary vote of confidence in April 2022, blames the country’s powerful military for removing him from power by colluding with his political opponents. Both deny the allegations. 

The former prime minister, who has been in prison since August 2023 on a slew of charges he says are politically motivated, also alleges his party was denied victory by the army and his political rivals in the 2024 general election through rigging. 

The army and the government both deny his allegations.