NEW YORK A federal judge who faced Republican demands for impeachment after blocking Elon Musk’s government review team from accessing sensitive Treasury Department records will consider whether to release grand jury testimony from the criminal case of Jeffrey Epstein’s associate Ghislaine Maxwell.
US District Judge Paul Engelmayer in Manhattan was assigned to the case on Monday. Maxwell’s trial judge, Alison Nathan, is now a federal appellate judge.
The assignment came three days after the US government sought to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Epstein, the disgraced financier and sex offender who died by suicide in 2019 in jail after being charged with sex trafficking.
In a Friday court filing, the Department of Justice said the criminal cases against Epstein and Maxwell are a matter of public interest, justifying the release of associated grand jury transcripts.
Backers of conspiracy theories about Epstein have urged President Donald Trump to release a broad array of investigative files related to Epstein, not just grand jury transcripts. Separately, US District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami was assigned on Monday to preside over Trump’s $10-billion lawsuit accusing The Wall Street Journal of defaming him by claiming he created a lewd birthday greeting for Epstein in 2003.
Dow Jones, which publishes the Journal and is part of Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, said it will defend against the lawsuit, and had “full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting.”
News Corp. and Murdoch are also defendants.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the Journal had been removed from the press pool covering Trump’s July 25-29 trip to Scotland because of its “fake and defamatory conduct.”
“As the appeals court confirmed, the Wall Street Journal or any other news outlet are not guaranteed special access to cover President Trump in the Oval Office, aboard Air Force One, and in his private workspaces,” Leavitt said in a statement.
A spokesperson for Dow Jones declined to comment on Leavitt’s statement.
Earlier this year, the White House removed The Associated Press from pool coverage because it had continued to refer to the Gulf of Mexico by that name instead of Trump’s preferred “Gulf of America.”
Many Trump supporters view the judiciary as an impediment to the Republican president’s policy and personal goals.
Each case could take several months or longer to resolve, followed by possible appeals.
Engelmayer and Gayles were appointed to the bench by Democratic President Barack Obama. US District Judge Richard Berman, an appointee of Democratic President Bill Clinton, will oversee the government’s request for transcripts in Epstein’s criminal case.
Engelmayer, 64, came under fire and drew Musk’s scorn in February after temporarily blocking Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from accessing Treasury systems. Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Wisconsin Republican, said impeachment was justified because the judge played politics in his decision, “demonstrating clear bias and prejudice against the president and the 74,000,000 Americans who voted for him.”
Judicial impeachments are rare and normally reserved for serious misconduct, not disapproval of individual rulings.
Any unsealed transcripts are likely to be redacted, reflecting privacy or security concerns.
Gayles, 58, has been on the federal bench since 2014, after the US Senate approved his nomination by a 98-0 vote.
The Wall Street Journal case is at least the second Trump lawsuit he has overseen.
Gayles presided in 2023 over Trump’s $500-million lawsuit accusing former personal lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen of breaching fiduciary duties by revealing confidences and spreading falsehoods in books, podcasts, and media appearances. Trump voluntarily dismissed that case after six months. The lawyer who filed that case also filed the Journal lawsuit.
Judge who drew calls for impeachment over DOGE ruling assigned to Maxwell transcript case
https://arab.news/c6db6
Judge who drew calls for impeachment over DOGE ruling assigned to Maxwell transcript case
- New York judge was seen as impediment to Musk’s DOGE
- Florida judge handled Trump lawsuit against Michael Cohen
South Sudan officers face court martial over civilian massacre
- The increasingly unstable country is seeing a surge of fighting between government and opposition forces
JUBA: South Sudanese soldiers, including two officers, will face a court martial over a civilian massacre last month, the army spokesman said Wednesday.
The increasingly unstable country is seeing a surge of fighting between government and opposition forces, much of it in eastern Jonglei state where at least 280,000 people have been displaced since December according to the UN.
At least 25 civilians, including women and children, were killed in Ayod County in Jonglei state on February 21, according to the opposition.
Army spokesman Lul Ruai Koang said that two officers, including a major, and several non-commissioned officers, had been arrested and would face charges in the capital Juba, “before they are arraigned before a competent military court martial.”
He said the deaths were attributed to “some elements” under Gen. Johnson Olony, who was filmed in January ordering troops to “spare no lives” in Jonglei.
Koang said the soldiers had “moved out without the knowledge or authorization of the division commander.”
He also said they had been part of a militia group allied to opposition forces, parts of which had not yet been fully integrated into the army.
Military integration was among the core principles of a peace agreement that ended South Sudan’s five-year civil war in 2018 between President Salva Kiir and his long-time rival, Riek Machar, but it was never implemented.
Koang said the army regretted the loss of lives, adding: “We would like to once again remind our forces that their mandate is to protect civilians and their property, not to do the opposite.”
It followed an impassioned plea from the Sudan and South Sudan Catholic Bishops’ Conference on recent civilian killings — in Ayod, and also in Abiemnom County near the Sudan border where at least 169 people were killed on Sunday.
“We implore you to deploy resources to protect vulnerable populations and foster a climate of dialogue and reconciliation instead of violence and revenge, consoling the bereaved and supporting the afflicted,” it said in a statement.
