First report of deadly Air India crash depicts final seconds in cockpit

1 / 2
The Air India flight crashed on June 12 and killed at least 260 people, including 19 on the ground, in the northwestern city of Ahmedabad. (Central Industrial Security Force/AFP)
2 / 2
An investigation team inspects the wreckage of Air India flight 171 a day after it crashed in a residential area near the airport, in Ahmedabad on June 13, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 12 July 2025
Follow

First report of deadly Air India crash depicts final seconds in cockpit

  • London-bound Air India flight lasted about 30 seconds between takeoff and crash
  • Preliminary report also depicted confusion in cockpit moments before the crash

New Delhi: The fuel supply to the engines of the Air India jet that crashed last month was cut off almost immediately after takeoff, causing the plane to plummet back to the ground after pilots failed to regain thrust in time to avert the catastrophe, a preliminary report has found.

The London-bound Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner crashed shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport in the western Indian state of Gujarat on June 12.

The Air India flight was carrying 242 people — 230 passengers, two pilots and 10 crew members. Only one person, a British national sitting in an emergency exit seat, survived the crash, which also killed 19 people on the ground.

On Saturday, India’s Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau issued the first report of the deadly incident, revealing that the flight lasted about 30 seconds between takeoff and crash.

Once the aircraft achieved its maximum recorded speed, “the Engine 1 and Engine 2 fuel cutoff switches transitioned from RUN to CUTOFF position one after another” within a second, according to a chronology laid out in the report, meaning that the fuel supply to the engines was stopped.

It also indicated confusion in the cockpit moments before the crash, as “one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cutoff” in the cockpit voice recording, while “the other pilot responded that he did not do so.”

About 10 seconds after the fuel cut-off, the switches were moved back in quick succession to their so-called run position. The pilots managed to relight both engines, but only one of them properly engaged, while the other failed to build up enough power again.

One of the pilots issued a “mayday, mayday, mayday” distress call just a few seconds before impact. But before air traffic controllers could get a response about what had gone wrong, the plane crashed just outside the airport boundary and then plunged into a hostel packed with medical students.

The commanding pilot of the Air India plane was Sumeet Sabharwal, 56, who had a total flying experience of 15,638 hours. His co-pilot was Clive Kunder, 32, who had 3,403 hours of total experience.

AAIB’s preliminary report did not provide a full picture of the interaction between the two pilots in the flight deck, and there was no mention of other exchanges beyond the brief query about the switches and no specifics on each pilots’ actions.

It also included other factors that could have impacted the flight. There was “no significant bird activity” observed on the flight path and the aircraft was not carrying any dangerous goods and was taking off “within allowable limits.”

Bahadur Chand Gupta, an Indian aviation engineer, said that the fuel switch indicated a “very strange” situation in the cockpit.

“The fuel switches are guarded (by brackets) actually. Why will anybody remove them?” Gupta said. “More investigation is required … We have to find out why it happened.”

The report is based on an examination of data extracted from the cockpit voice recorder and digital flight data recorder and other details gathered from the scene of the crash, the worst aviation accident in more than a decade.

“Investigation is continuing and the investigation team will review and examine additional evidence, records and information that is being sought from the stakeholders,” AAIB said.

A final report is expected within a year.

The Airline Pilots’ Association of India said that “qualified, experienced personnel — especially line pilots — are still not being included in the investigation,” and called on the AAIB to include it, at least as observers.

ALPA India also asked for clarity on an information bulletin issued by the US’ Federal Aviation Administration about the potential disengagement of the fuel control switch locking feature.

“The report refers to a serviceability bulletin concerning the fuel control switch gates, which indicates a potential equipment malfunction,” ALPA India President Capt. Sam Thomas said in a statement.

“While the bulletin exists, ALPA-I demands clarity on whether the recommendations outlined in the bulletin were implemented prior to the flight.”


DR Congo says M23 withdrawal from key city a ‘distraction’

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

DR Congo says M23 withdrawal from key city a ‘distraction’

  • “The son, M23, offers itself in sacrifice before the American mediator to protect the father, Rwanda,” Muyaya said
  • The announcement is a “non-event, a diversion, a distraction”

KINSHASA: The Congolese government on Wednesday said the M23 armed group’s recent announcement that it would withdraw troops from the key eastern city of Uvira was a “distraction.”
The Rwanda-backed militia seized the strategic city near the border with Burundi last Wednesday, days after the Congolese and Rwandan governments signed a peace deal — an agreement US President Donald Trump had hailed as a “great miracle.”
“The son, M23, offers itself in sacrifice before the American mediator to protect the father, Rwanda,” Congolese government spokesman Patrick Muyaya said on Wednesday.
The announcement is a “non-event, a diversion, a distraction... We are waiting for the withdrawal of Rwandan troops from all parts of our territory,” he added.
The M23’s latest advance has thrown the future of the peace process into doubt and raised fears of a wider regional war.
Its capture of Uvira — a city of several hundred thousand people — allowed it to control the land border with Burundi and cut the DRC off from military support from its neighbor.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Saturday that Rwanda had clearly violated the peace agreement it signed with its neighbor on December 4, and vowed unspecified “action” in response.
A day earlier, US ambassador to the United Nations Mike Waltz accused Rwanda of “leading the region toward more instability and toward war.”
Leader of the M23’s political branch announced Tuesday in a statement that the group would “unilaterally withdraw its forces from the city of Uvira, as requested by the US mediators.”
M23 fighters were still present in Uvira on Wednesday, according to residents contacted by AFP.
The DRC’s mineral-rich east has been ravaged by three decades of conflict. Since taking up arms again in 2021, the M23 has seized swathes of territory, leading to a spiralling humanitarian crisis.
While Kigali has never explicitly acknowledged backing the armed group, Washington has directly blamed Rwanda for the M23’s capture of Uvira.
Muyaya accused Rwandan President Paul Kagame of seeking to “entrench his control over this part of our country through violence,” arguing these actions “worsen an already catastrophic humanitarian situation.”
At least 85,000 refugees have fled into Burundi since the advance, with the numbers rising daily, Burundian officials said Tuesday.