Nike cuts ties with Australian brand ambassador over pro-Palestinian posts

Since the start of the conflict in Gaza in October 2023, Tame has shared posts and attended events expressing solidarity with Palestinians. (Prudence Upton/File)
Short Url
Updated 09 June 2025
Follow

Nike cuts ties with Australian brand ambassador over pro-Palestinian posts

  • Activist and runner Grace Tame dropped after sportswear giant’s review into her social media posts
  • Tame recently sparked a backlash after resharing posts calling the killing of two Israeli aides in Washington ‘not an antisemitic attack but a response to Israeli aggression in Gaza’

LONDON: Nike has ended its partnership with Australian brand ambassador Grace Tame after the activist shared several pro-Palestinian posts on social media.

Tame, a long-distance runner and high-profile advocate for survivors of sexual assault, had used her platform in recent months to speak out against Israel’s military campaign in Gaza, describing it as “genocide” and calling for a ceasefire.

The American sportswear giant confirmed the decision over the weekend, following growing speculation after it launched a review of Tame’s public statements.

A Nike spokesperson said on Friday: “We’ve agreed to part ways. We wish Grace the best as she continues her running journey.”

Tame signed a $100,000 ambassadorial deal with Nike in January, marking a return to the brand after a previous collaboration four years ago.

Since the start of the conflict in Gaza in October 2023, Tame has shared posts and attended events expressing solidarity with Palestinians.

In November, she signed a global ceasefire petition organized by Oxfam. In May, she gave a speech at an event hosted by the Australian Palestine Advocacy Network, where she said: “Empathy should have no boundaries.”

Tame also revealed she had been asked not to speak about the war at other public engagements.

Her increasingly vocal advocacy drew criticism from pro-Israel commentators in Australia, some of whom accused her of sharing inflammatory and antisemitic content.

In May, Tame reposted a statement from Palestinian writer Mohammed El-Kurd criticizing Western media coverage of the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy aides in Washington.

She quoted the post, which argued the incident was a direct response to Israel’s assault on Gaza, rather than a random antisemitic attack.

“Even though it was undeniably, and by the alleged shooter’s own admission, a response to the ongoing Israeli assault on Gaza, which killed one hundred and seven Palestinians in the last 24 hours alone,” she reposted to her 260,000 followers.

Tame, no stranger to controversy, has long been a divisive figure in Australian public life.

Earlier this year, she appeared at a public event with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese wearing a T-shirt that read “F**k Murdoch,” a jab at media mogul Rupert Murdoch. In the accompanying Instagram caption, she criticized what she called “dynastically wealthy white supremacist corporate oligarchs ruining our planet, funding genocide, war, and destruction.”

In response, Murdoch-owned The Australian accused her of being fixated on Israel and wrote that Nike’s “face-saving statement of a mutual separation with Tame is arguably misplaced in its generosity.”

The newspaper also noted that all Nike stores in Australia are operated by Fox Group, an Israeli company listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange, adding another layer to the fallout.


EU warns Meta it must open up WhatsApp to rival AI chatbots

Updated 09 February 2026
Follow

EU warns Meta it must open up WhatsApp to rival AI chatbots

  • The EU executive on Monday told Meta to give rival chatbots access to WhatsApp after an antitrust probe found the US giant to be in breach of the bloc’s competition rules

BRUSSELS: The EU executive on Monday told Meta to give rival chatbots access to WhatsApp after an antitrust probe found the US giant to be in breach of the bloc’s competition rules.
The European Commission said a change in Meta’s terms had “effectively” barred third-party artificial intelligence assistants from connecting to customers via the messaging platform since January.
Competition chief Teresa Ribera said the EU was “considering quickly imposing interim measures on Meta, to preserve access for competitors to WhatsApp while the investigation is ongoing, and avoid Meta’s new policy irreparably harming competition in Europe.”
The EU executive, which is in charge of competition policy, sent Meta a warning known as a “statement of objections,” a formal step in antitrust probes.
Meta now has a chance to reply and defend itself. Monday’s step does not prejudge the outcome of the probe, the commission said.
The tech giant rejected the commission’s preliminary findings.
“The facts are that there is no reason for the EU to intervene,” a Meta spokesperson said.
“There are many AI options and people can use them from app stores, operating systems, devices, websites, and industry partnerships. The commission’s logic incorrectly assumes the WhatsApp Business API is a key distribution channel for these chatbots,” the spokesperson said.
Opened in December, the EU probe marks the latest attempt by the 27-nation bloc to rein in Big Tech, many of whom are based in the United States, in the face of strong pushback by the government of US President Donald Trump.
- Meta in the firing line -
The investigation covers the European Economic Area (EEA), made up of the bloc’s 27 states, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway — with the exception of Italy, which opened a separate investigation into Meta in July.
The commission said that Meta is “likely to be dominant” in the EEA for consumer messaging apps, notably through WhatsApp, and accused Meta of “abusing this dominant position by refusing access” to competitors.
“We cannot allow dominant tech companies to illegally leverage their dominance to give themselves an unfair advantage,” Ribera said in a statement.
There is no legal deadline for concluding an antitrust probe.
Meta is already under investigation under different laws in the European Union.
EU regulators are also investigating its platforms Facebook and Instagram over fears they are not doing enough to tackle the risk of social media addiction for children.
The company also appealed a 200-million-euro fine imposed last year by the commission under the online competition law, the Digital Markets Act.
That case focused on its policy asking users to choose between an ad-free subscription and a free, ad-supported service, and Brussels and Meta remain in discussions over finding an alternative that would address the EU’s concerns.