Pakistan says open to water talks with India but insists Indus treaty remains binding

A view of the Neelum–Jhelum Hydropower Project in Neelum Valley in Azad Kashmir, Pakistan on May 8, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 22 May 2025
Follow

Pakistan says open to water talks with India but insists Indus treaty remains binding

  • Pakistan’s attorney general says India recently wrote to propose changes to the Indus Waters Treaty
  • He says Islamabad considers the treaty fully operational as Modi threatens to block water flows

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is willing to discuss water-sharing concerns with India, the country’s top legal official said on Thursday, though he maintained the decades-old Indus Waters Treaty remained legally binding on both countries and could not be unilaterally suspended.

Attorney General Mansoor Usman Awan shared his country’s perspective with Reuters over the issue in an exclusive interview after Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s reiterated his threat to block water flows to Pakistan.

India has said it would suspend the treaty as part of a series of measures following a deadly militant attack in Indian-administered Kashmir on April 22, which New Delhi blamed on Islamabad. Pakistan denies the allegation and says any attempt to disrupt water access would be a breach of international obligations with severe consequences.

“Pakistan is willing to talk about or to address anything, any concerns they [the Indians] may have,” Awan said during the interview.

He said India had written to Pakistan in recent weeks, citing population growth and clean energy needs as reasons to modify the treaty. But he said any discussions would have to take part under the terms of the treaty.

Islamabad maintains the treaty is legally binding and no party can unilaterally suspend it, Awan said.

“As far as Pakistan is concerned, the treaty is very much operational, functional, and anything which India does, it does at its own cost and peril as far as the building of any hydroelectric power projects are concerned,” he added.

Modi on Thursday ramped up pressure during a public event in Rajasthan, a state bordering Pakistan, saying: “Pakistan will not get water from rivers over which India has rights.”

“Pakistan will have to pay a heavy price for every terrorist attack … Pakistan’s army will pay it. Pakistan’s economy will pay it,” he added, referencing the April 22 attack that left 26 people dead.

The 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, brokered by the World Bank, allocates water from six rivers shared by the two countries. It guarantees Pakistan access to waters that irrigate nearly 80 percent of its farmland.

Awan said Pakistan would oppose any attempts to alter the treaty outside of its legal framework.

The nuclear-armed neighbors had earlier engaged in their most intense military confrontation in decades before agreeing to a US-brokered ceasefire on May 10.

India and Pakistan have fought three wars since gaining independence in 1947, two of them over Kashmir, which both claim in full but administer in part. India accuses Pakistan of supporting Kashmiri separatists in the disputed region, a charge Pakistan denies.

Tensions further escalated on Wednesday between the two countries when a suicide bombing targeted a school bus in Pakistan’s southwestern Balochistan province, killing six people, including four children.

Pakistan’s government and military accused “Indian terror proxies” of orchestrating the attack, an allegation India rejected.

In the fallout from the April attack, both countries have halted trade, closed borders and suspended most visa processing, deepening diplomatic and economic strains.


UN says 270,000 Afghans have returned from Iran, Pakistan this year

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

UN says 270,000 Afghans have returned from Iran, Pakistan this year

  • UNHCR says 110,000 Afghans returned from Iran while 160,000 returned from Pakistan since start of 2026
  • Return numbers seem to have risen since Gulf war erupted on Feb. 28, says UNHCR official in Afghanistan

GENEVA: Some 270,000 Afghans have returned to their country from Pakistan and Iran so far this year, the UN said Tuesday, warning that the escalating Middle East war risked pushing the numbers higher.

UNHCR, the United Nations’ refugee agency, said that 110,000 Afghans had returned from Iran and another 160,000 had returned from Pakistan since the start of 2026.

And the numbers seem to have risen since the Middle East erupted on February 28, with the United States and Israel unleashing a barrage of strikes on Iran, and Tehran responding with drone and missile strikes on Israeli and US interests across the region.

Since then, there have been some 1,700 returns from Iran to Afghanistan each day, Arafat Jamal, UNHCR’s representative in Afghanistan, told reporters in Geneva.

Speaking from Islam Qala, on the Afghan-Iranian border, he said the situation there was “deceptively calm.”

“Returns are orderly but freighted with tension and apprehension,” he said, adding that with the hostilities elsewhere escalating, “I do fear there is more to come.”

“We are preparing for massive returns.”

He pointed out that Afghanistan was “facing the ramifications of what is happening with Iran,” while clashes have erupted along the Afghan border with Pakistan.

The new Middle East war, he warned, was “layering itself on top of an existing war on another frontier,” Jamal said.

UNHCR highlighted that the latest crises came after returns to Afghanistan had already been “exceptionally high” in recent years.

More than five million Afghans had returned from neighboring countries in the past two years, including 1.9 million returning from Iran last year alone.

Jamal warned that “many Afghan families are now facing cycles of displacement: first forced to flee Afghanistan, later displaced again inside Iran due to conflict, and now returning once more to Afghanistan.”

“And upon return in Afghanistan, the triply-displaced enter a spiral of precarity and uncertainty.”
Returns from Pakistan had meanwhile stabilized in recent weeks, as the main crossing point at Torkham remained closed due to the tensions there, Jamal said.

But he warned that “movements could increase sharply once the border reopens.”

UNHCR and the UN children’s agency UNICEF said Tuesday they were working to strengthen their capacity to operate at the borders and within Afghanistan.

But “given the scale of returns and the financial constraints facing humanitarian operations, additional support will be needed if arrivals increase,” UNHCR said, without specifying the amount needed.