Islamabad says India planning ‘wave of terrorism’ in Pakistani cities, vows ‘tit-for-tat’ response

Pakistan’s paramilitary soldiers stand guard at a checkpoint near Wagah, a joint border crossing point between the Pakistan and India border, on April 24, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 24 April 2025
Follow

Islamabad says India planning ‘wave of terrorism’ in Pakistani cities, vows ‘tit-for-tat’ response

  • Suspected militants killed 26 people at a popular tourist attraction in Indian-administered Kashmir’s Pahalgam area
  • Both countries have since taken slew of retaliatory measures including closing only land border, suspending special visas

ISLAMABAD: Defense Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif on Thursday accused India of preparing to launch a “wave of terrorism” in Pakistani cities, warning that Islamabad would retaliate with a “tit-for-tat” response as relations between the nuclear-armed rivals plummeted following a deadly militant attack in Kashmir.
On Tuesday, gunmen killed 26 men at a tourist site in the Pahalgam area of Indian-administered Kashmir in the worst attack on civilians in the country in nearly two decades. India alleged cross-border involvement, without offering proof, and announced a raft of measures to downgrade ties on Wednesday including suspending a six-decade-old river-sharing treaty as well as closing the only land crossing between the neighbors. Pakistan followed with its own actions that included shutting its airspace to Indian planes and rejecting New Delhi’s suspension of the critical water agreement. 
Islamabad warned Delhi the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty would be seen as an “act of war” to which Pakistan would respond with “full force across the complete spectrum of national power.”
The nuclear-armed nations, who have both fought two out of three wars over the disputed region of Kashmir since 1947, frequently accuse each other of carrying out cross-border attacks.
“According to our information, India is preparing to launch a wave of terrorism in various Pakistani cities instead of opting for an all-out war,” Asif told reporters at a news briefing.




Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif chairs a meeting of the National Security Committee in Islamabad, Pakistan on April 24, 2025. (PID)

“And I want to make it absolutely clear that we are fully prepared to counter this wave of terrorism.”
Asif and three other federal ministers were briefing the media on Pakistan’s retaliatory measures, including that Islamabad would exercise the right to hold all bilateral agreements with India, including but not limited to the 1972 Simla Agreement, in abeyance. In the absence of the Simla deal, India loses its rationale for wanting the Kashmir dispute to be treated as a bilateral dispute that must be settled only through bilateral negotiations. Under the treaty, New Delhi has consistently denied any third party intervention in the conflict, even from the United Nations.
Pakistan also closed the Attari-Wagah land border, the only operational land port between the two nations, with immediate effect and suspended all cross-border transit from India through this route “without exception.” 
With no direct flights operating between the two countries, the move cuts all transport links between them.
Islamabad also suspended all visas under the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES) issued to Indian nationals, deeming them canceled with immediate effect, with the exception of Sikh pilgrims who frequently travel to Pakistan to visit religious sites. Pakistan gave Indian nationals currently in Pakistan under SVES 48 hours to leave, and said Indian defense, naval and air advisers in Islamabad had been declared “persona non grata.”

“Our response will be tit-for-tat, four citizens are targeted, Indian citizens will also not remain safe in their cities,” the defense minister said.
Asif warned that even if a single Pakistani citizen was killed in an Indian-planned “terrorist” attack, Delhi would “pay for it.”
“This should be absolutely clear to them,” he said.
“BLAME GAME”
The Indus Waters Treaty, brokered by the World Bank in 1960, allocates the six Indus Basin rivers between India and Pakistan, with the Bank acting as its guarantor.
Pakistan has rights to the western rivers — Indus, Jhelum, and Chenab — for irrigation, drinking, and non-consumptive uses like hydropower. India controls the eastern rivers — Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej — for unrestricted use but must not significantly alter their flow.
Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar, who addressed the news conference alongside Asif, said the treaty was “sacred” for Pakistan and could not legally be “unilaterally” terminated.
“Pakistan has all the avenues and options available at the international level under the Indus Waters Treaty and the Vienna Convention and will exercise them if the treaty is unilaterally suspended,” he said.

 




Activists of Pakistan Markazi Muslim League shout slogans during an anti-India protest in Karachi on April 24, 2025. (AFP)

Pakistan and India both claim Kashmir in full but rule it in part. India has long accused Pakistan of helping Islamist separatists who have battled security forces in its part of the territory, accusations Islamabad denies.
Indian officials have said Tuesday’s attack had “cross-border linkages” and Kashmiri police, in notices identifying three people “involved” in the violence, said two of them were Pakistani nationals. India has not elaborated on the links or shared proof.

Pakistan has said India’s accusations were made without any “credible investigation” or “verifiable evidence,” saying they are “frivolous” and “devoid of rationality.”
It has also called on India to refrain from a “reflexive blame game” and to take responsibility for its “failure to provide security” to people.


Pakistan weighs Trump Gaza board amid expert calls for Muslim allies’ consultations

Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan weighs Trump Gaza board amid expert calls for Muslim allies’ consultations

  • Former diplomats warn board could sideline UN, legitimize US unilateral plans
  • Analysts say Pakistan should assert independent positions if it joins the body

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is weighing an invitation from US President Donald Trump to join a proposed international “Board of Peace” on Gaza, a move that has sparked debate among former diplomats and foreign policy experts who warned Tuesday it could sideline the United Nations and urge Islamabad to consult close Muslim allies.

The White House announced on Friday some members of the board, which is expected to supervise the temporary governance of Gaza under a fragile ceasefire in place since October and continue beyond that transitional phase.

These names included US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Trump’s special Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, former British prime minister Tony Blair and Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner. Trump himself would chair the board, according to a plan unveiled by the White House in October.

Pakistan’s foreign office confirmed on Sunday that Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif had also received an invitation to join the proposed body, stressing that “the country will remain engaged with international efforts for peace and security in Gaza, leading to a lasting solution to the Palestine issue in accordance with United Nations resolutions.”

“Since the Trump ‘Board of Peace’ is more like an international NGO now, which would include [Indian Prime Minister Narendra] Modi and [Israel’s Benjamin] Netanyahu, Pakistan should carefully take a decision in consultation with its close Muslim allies like Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Jordan, Egypt and Indonesia, and it should be a joint decision of these countries together,” Former federal minister and analyst Mushahid Hussain told Arab News.

“Otherwise, there is no point in being in the queue just to please Trump,” he added.

Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas have agreed that a Palestinian technocratic administration would operate under the oversight of an international board during a transitional period.

Hussain said that if Pakistan did decide to join the board, it should use the platform to clearly articulate its long-held positions.

“Pakistan should play the role of boldly promoting the right of self-determination of the peoples of Palestine and Kashmir, both occupied territories, and oppose any aggression against Iran, as peace and occupation or aggression cannot coexist,” he said.

International affairs analyst and author Naseem Zehra said Pakistan’s participation could still be justified if it allowed Islamabad to assert independent positions on global conflicts.

“Donald Trump has invited 60 heads of states and prime ministers to become part of the peace board, which is more like an alternative to the United Nations,” she said, referring to media reports about the board’s mandate. “If Pakistan is invited among 60 countries, it is acceptable for Pakistan to participate, and with a seat at the table, Pakistan can share its own view of how global issues can be resolved.”

Zehra added that Pakistan’s past diplomatic conduct showed it could maintain principled positions while engaging internationally.

Former ambassador to the United States Maleeh Lodhi took a stronger view, warning that the initiative appeared designed to bypass established international mechanisms.

“Pakistan should not join the Board for many reasons,” she said. “Its aim is for President Trump to get international support and legitimacy for his unilateral plans not just in Gaza but beyond, without member states having any real power.”

“It is being set up to supplant the UN in its primary role of maintaining international peace and security, with Trump effectively calling all the shots,” she added.

When contacted, Pakistan’s Defense Minister Khawaja Asif declined to comment and referred queries to the foreign office.

However, the foreign ministry spokesman Tahir Andrabi did not respond to Arab News requests for comment by the time of filing.

Pakistan has consistently supported Palestinian statehood under United Nations resolutions and has publicly criticized Israeli military operations in Gaza, while also opposing broader regional escalations, including attacks on Iran.