2012 - The Syrian civil war

Syrians react while searching for survivors in rubble following an airstrike in Azaz, near the northern city of Aleppo. AFP
Short Url
Updated 19 April 2025
Follow

2012 - The Syrian civil war

  • The hopes and promises of the Arab Spring ignited a bloody, 14-year conflict in the country

DUBAI: On March 15, 2011, the tidal wave of the Arab Spring, which originated in Tunisia three months earlier, finally engulfed Syria. 

The immediate trigger for the mass protests that broke out in Damascus and Aleppo was the arrest and torture of a group of teenagers who had scrawled the words “Your turn has come, doctor” in red paint on a wall in the southern city of Daraa. 

The “doctor” was Bashar Assad, who became president of Syria in 2000, succeeding his father, Hafez, an army officer who had seized power in 1970. His “turn” was a reference to the toppling of presidential counterparts in Tunisia, Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali, and Egypt, Hosni Mubarak, in January and February respectively. 

The graffiti was an expression of the growing anger among Syrians at a dynastic regime wreathed in corruption and bolstered by a ruthless security apparatus. 

How we wrote it




Arab News highlighted the call from “Syria’s neighbors” to Assad, demanding he “stop the bloodshed” and protect civilians.

As the protests escalated, with “day of rage” demonstrations spreading to several cities, the regime reacted instinctively: with violence. On March 18, the army fired on protesters in Daraa, a city close to the border with Jordan, who were demanding the release of the teenagers who had painted the slogan on a wall of their school. 

Four people were shot dead that day. Syria’s descent into civil war had begun. 

At this point there was an opportunity for Assad to change course and, perhaps, spare his country the 11 years of bloody conflict that lay ahead. By the end of March, more protesters had been killed. But after Assad sacked his cabinet, and as he prepared to address parliament on March 30, his first public statement since the protests began, he was widely expected to offer some concessions. 

Instead, he doubled down on repression. There would be no immediate reforms, no crackdown on corruption, and he ruled out the anticipated lifting of hated emergency laws, in place since 1963, that gave the security forces carte blanche to crush dissent in any way they saw fit. 

Instead, to orchestrated applause, Assad accused “conspirators” and “outside forces,” including Israel, of stirring up trouble in Syria and causing the protests. There was no apology for the deaths of protesters. 

 

Key Dates

  • 1

    Bashar Assad becomes president of Syria, succeeding his father, Hafez, an army officer who seized power in 1970.

    Timeline Image July 17, 2000

  • 2

    After the presidents of Tunisia and Egypt are toppled during the Arab Spring uprisings, protests against the government break out in Syria. The regime responds with extreme violence.

    Timeline Image March 2011

  • 3

    Officers begin to defect from Assad’s forces and form the Free Syrian Army.

    Timeline Image June 10, 2011

  • 4

    UN’s head of peacekeeping operations says fighting in Syria has escalated to the point of civil war.

    Timeline Image June 12, 2012

  • 5

    Assad’s forces use chemical weapons in an attack on the opposition-held area of Ghouta, near Damascus. The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights says the death toll exceeds 500.

    Timeline Image Aug. 21, 2013

  • 6

    Russia intervenes in Syria, shifting the conflict in favor of Assad.

    Timeline Image Sept. 30, 2015

  • 7

    Following a swift offensive by HTS rebels, Damascus falls and Assad flees the country.

    Timeline Image Dec. 8, 2024

The protests escalated dramatically in the three months following the speech. Demonstrations took place in several cities, and tens of thousands of people took to the streets in coordinated protests across the country on July 1. Hundreds were killed or detained by the army. 

Perhaps the single moment at which mass protests escalated to the point of civil war came on June 10, 2011, when an officer in the Syrian army released a video announcing his defection, along with 150 of his men. Giving his name, rank and position, Lt. Col. Hussein Harmoush urged other members of the regime’s military forces to follow suit. 

“Our mission,” he said in the video, “is to protect unarmed protesters who are asking for freedom and democracy. We took an oath to stand in the face of our enemies, not our unarmed people.” 

Harmoush would pay for the stand he took with his life. Along with members of his family, he sought sanctuary in a Turkish refugee camp shortly after defecting, but on Aug. 29 he was abducted and later paraded on Syrian television. He was never seen again and is thought to have been executed. 

Nonetheless, other military leaders did indeed follow his example. On July 31, one of them, an air force officer, Col. Riad Asaad, announced the formation of the Free Syrian Army, which would become one of the most prominent Syrian opposition forces.

Assad had been president for 11 years when the civil war began. He would cling to power for another 11, bloody years, during which hundreds of thousands of Syrians were killed and half the population was displaced.




Syrian Zakia Abdullah sits on the rubble of her house in the Tariq al-Bab district of the northern city of Aleppo on February 23, 2013. AFP

Throughout it all — the regime’s shocking use of chemical weapons against its own people, the growing influence of extremist groups such as Al-Qaeda and Daesh, US-led coalition airstrikes, Russian military support for the regime, the sudden withdrawal of US troops from northeastern Syria, the sanctions-hit regime’s embrace of the drug Captagon as a source of revenue — it seemed that Assad would continue to weather the storm. 

When the end finally came in December 2024, following a major opposition offensive led by Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham, a coalition of several armed groups that was formed in 2017, it was as sudden and unexpected as it was welcomed by millions of Syrians.

  • Nadia Al Faour is a regional correspondent for Arab News. She previously contributed to international publications including The Guardian and USA Today. 


Russia might try to take Ukrainian city of Sumy, Putin says

Updated 4 min 4 sec ago
Follow

Russia might try to take Ukrainian city of Sumy, Putin says

  • Ukraine said Putin’s comments showed “disdain” for the peace process
  • “We have no objective to take Sumy, but in principle I do not rule it out... They pose a constant threat to us, constantly shelling the border areas,” Putin said

SAINT PETERSBURG: Russian President Vladimir Putin said Friday he did not “rule out” his forces attempting to seize the northeastern Ukrainian city of Sumy, casting fresh doubt over the prospect of peace talks between Moscow and Kyiv.

Ukraine said Putin’s comments showed “disdain” for the peace process.

Diplomatic efforts to end the three-year conflict have stalled in recent weeks and Kyiv has accused Moscow of deliberately sabotaging a peace deal to prolong its full-scale offensive on the country.

Russia currently occupies around a fifth of Ukraine and has claimed four Ukrainian regions as its own since launching its assault in 2022, in addition to Crimea, which it captured in 2014.

The Sumy region is not one of the regions Moscow has formally annexed, although Russian forces have recently made inroads there for the first time in three years.

At Russia’s flagship economic forum in Saint Petersburg, Putin suggested Moscow could take Sumy as part of the creation of a “buffer zone” along the border and repeated his denial of Ukrainian statehood.

“We have no objective to take Sumy, but in principle I do not rule it out... They pose a constant threat to us, constantly shelling the border areas,” Putin said.

“I consider Russians and Ukrainians to be one people. In that sense, all of Ukraine is ours,” he told attendees, when asked why his army was entering areas Moscow did not claim as its own.

“There is a saying: wherever a Russian soldier sets foot, that is ours.”

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga described Putin’s comments as “deranged” and called for Kyiv’s allies to slap “devastating sanctions” on Russia.

“The only way to force Russia into peace is to deprive it of its sense of impunity,” he wrote in a post on X.

Putin’s widening territorial ambitions are likely to roil Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky,
who has accused Moscow of not wanting to end the fighting.

The two sides held rounds of direct talks in Istanbul in May and in June, but Kyiv accused Moscow of sending “dummy” negotiators with no real power to enact a peace deal.

Putin has declined to take part in the peace talks in person and on Thursday said he would only meet Zelensky during a “final phase” of negotiations on ending the three-year conflict.

He has also insisted Ukraine give up territory it already controls for peace.

Kyiv says it cannot and will not accept Russian occupation of any part of its land.

In his address Friday, Putin denied he was calling for Ukraine to “capitulate.”

“We are not seeking Ukraine’s surrender. We insist on recognition of the realities that have developed on the ground,” the Russian leader said.

Putin repeated that Moscow was “advancing on all fronts” and that his troops had penetrated up to 12 kilometers (seven miles) into the Sumy region.

He also accused Kyiv of “stupidity” by launching an incursion into Russia’s Kursk region last August.

“They are creating problems for themselves,” he said.

Russia has for months been rejecting calls for an unconditional ceasefire, launching deadly attacks on its neighbor.


19 injured in Israeli port after Iran missile barrage

Updated 13 min 49 sec ago
Follow

19 injured in Israeli port after Iran missile barrage

JERUSALEM: At least 19 people were injured in the northern Israeli port city of Haifa as Iran fired a fresh barrage of missiles on Friday afternoon, authorities said.
Iran has been launching daily missile salvos at Israel for the past week since a wide-ranging Israeli attack on its nuclear and military facilities triggered war.
One projectile slammed into an area by the docks in Haifa on Friday afternoon where it damaged a building and blew out windows, littering the ground with rubble, AFP images showed.
Israel’s foreign ministry said it struck “next to” the Al-Jarina mosque.
The locations of missile strikes in Israel are subject to strict military censorship rules and are not always provided in detail to the public.
A spokesman for Haifa’s Rambam hospital said 19 people had been injured in the city, with one in a serious condition.
A military official said that “approximately 20 missiles were launched toward Israel” in the latest Iranian salvo.
More than 450 missiles have been fired at the country so far, along with about 400 drones, according to Israel’s National Public Diplomacy Directorate.
The directorate added that the country’s tax authority had received over 25,000 claims linked to damage caused to buildings during the war.
Israel launched a massive wave of strikes on June 13, triggering an immediate retaliation from Tehran.
Residential areas in both countries have suffered, while Israel and Iran have traded accusations of targeting civilians.
At least 25 people have been killed in Israel by Iranian missile strikes, according to authorities.
Iran said on Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. It has not updated the toll since.

Saudi foreign minister arrives in Istanbul for OIC meeting

Updated 39 min 33 sec ago
Follow

Saudi foreign minister arrives in Istanbul for OIC meeting

ISTANBUL: Saudi Arabia’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, Prince Faisal bin Farhan, arrived in Istanbul on Friday to take part in the 51st session of the Council of Foreign Ministers of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation.

The high-level meeting, to be hosted by Turkiye, will see foreign ministers from OIC member states convene on Saturday to discuss avenues for strengthening joint multilateral cooperation, the Saudi Press Agency reported.

The agenda also includes deliberations on regional developments and their broader international implications, SPA added.

The gathering comes amid heightened tensions across parts of the Islamic world, with participants expected to address key geopolitical challenges and reaffirm the OIC’s collective stance on pressing issues.


Recess evening at Hayy Jameel celebrates youth, creativity, alternative learning

Updated 20 June 2025
Follow

Recess evening at Hayy Jameel celebrates youth, creativity, alternative learning

  • Conclusion of flagship after-school initiative

JEDDAH: Hayy Jameel has hosted Recess: Closing Conversations to mark the conclusion of its flagship after-school initiative for teenagers.

The evening offered a platform to revisit the transformative journey of the program’s first cohort, and featured thoughtful exchanges with the learning team at Hayy, along with mentors who guided the students through the months-long experience.

The session welcomed reflections from mentors including Dr. Effat Fadag, Saudi artist and founder of Naqsh Art Studio; Rizwana Anwer, educator and alternative learning advocate; Sahrish Ali and Nayla Attar, artist-teachers and members of the learning team at Hayy Jameel; and Abdelelah Qutub, exhibition designer and program mentor. 

Speaking about the inspiration behind Recess, Attar said: “After all these foundations were laid out, we were really trying to create a comprehensive program, something that teaches teenagers how to navigate skills and topics usually reserved for much later in life.

“We wanted them to get a glimpse of what it means to move from high school into a design-thinking process, and even into the contemporary art world. There’s a big gap in how people perceive and interact with art, especially in Saudi, and Recess was about bridging that.”

Ali stressed the importance of creating lifelong learning spaces, and said: “We started by developing a program for kids aged 5 to 13, but we noticed a gap when it came to teens, so we built this program with weekly after-school sessions, combining core theoretical knowledge, practical art studio time, and mentorship from creatives in our network.”

Fadag said: “It’s not just about hearing, but listening. Listening helps promote the inner voice. One of the most important things for me was encouraging students to ask questions like ‘Why are we doing this?’ and to integrate research and critical thinking into their work. Art challenges us to negotiate identity and social engagement, and this is what we tried to bring into the program.”

Anwer brought an educator’s lens shaped by both international teaching experience and homeschooling, and said: “I came from a traditional academic background, but as a teacher I saw how many students struggled with that model.

“When I became a parent I knew I didn’t want to put my children in the same system. Homeschooling and unschooling helped me realize that learning can be more holistic and individual. That’s what we tried to reflect in Recess.”

Qutub, who boasts an architecture background, emphasized the importance of spatial thinking and collaborative presentation, and said: “Students had a tendency to view their work in isolation, so I worked with them to think about how their pieces related to one another and to the space as a whole.

“My role was to get them production-ready, to help them engage with the real-world process of creating and displaying artwork, and to see themselves as part of a collective dialogue.”

The showcase at Hayy Jameel featured the works of 10 young artists, with each piece a reflection of their journey through Recess. The multidisciplinary program, which ran from February to May, offered a structured yet flexible curriculum blending theoretical sessions, practical workshops, field trips, and portfolio development.

Through art-making, mentorship, and cultural engagement, the students explored themes like identity, nature, technology, and personal narrative, resulting in works that invited reflection and dialogue.

Hadeel Felemban, learning assistant at Hayy Jameel, said: “The program was mainly designed for high-school students who are passionate about pursuing art at a higher level.

“It ran over the course of several months, with weekly Saturday sessions that combined theory, practical work, and mentorship from artists and educators. The students learned about the creative process behind artworks and exhibitions, built their own portfolios, and engaged with different departments at Hayy, including the exhibition, cinema, and public programs teams. They also had weekly interventions with guest artists and visited cultural sites like the Islamic Biennale and Al-Balad.”

As the mentors gathered with students one last time for Closing Conversations, the atmosphere was charged with pride, curiosity, and a shared sense of accomplishment.

Young artist Aleen Alqurashi shared how the program had transformed her perspective on both art and herself, saying: “I honestly didn’t think I had any talent in art; I just joined because I wanted to improve.

“But throughout this program, it really helped me see things differently; not just in art, but in life. I discovered talents I didn’t know I had, and I wanted my final project to carry a deeper meaning, something people could relate to.”

Nooh Spurlock, 14, also a homeschooled student and the son of mentor Rizwana Anwer, participated in the program with a concept that merged creativity, gaming, and self-exploration.

He said: “My work is about a video game — are you inside your mind when you’re fighting against yourself?

“I was inspired by a lot of things: different video games, different elements from that genre. The mentors connected me with game developers who helped me with the research and planning.” 

His final project, titled “Into the Mind,” was a video game set inside the player’s consciousness, in which one must battle different versions of themselves. The game featured three levels, each representing a specific emotion, with each stage designed to mentally and emotionally prepare the player for the next.


Europeans’ meeting with top Iranian diplomat yields hope of more talks, no obvious breakthrough

Updated 21 min 52 sec ago
Follow

Europeans’ meeting with top Iranian diplomat yields hope of more talks, no obvious breakthrough

  • It was the first face-to-face meeting between Western and Iranian officials since the start of the conflict
  • “The good result today is that we leave the room with the impression that the Iranian side is fundamentally ready to continue talking,” Wadephul said

GENEVA: A meeting between Iran’s foreign minister and top European diplomats on Friday yielded hopes of further talks but no indication of any immediate concrete breakthrough, a week after the crisis centered on the Iranian nuclear program erupted into war between Israel and Tehran.

Foreign ministers from Britain, France and Germany, as well as the European Union’s foreign policy chief, emerged from talks at a Geneva hotel about 3 1/2 hours after Iran’s Abbas Araghchi arrived for the meeting.

It was the first face-to-face meeting between Western and Iranian officials since the start of the conflict.

“The good result today is that we leave the room with the impression that the Iranian side is fundamentally ready to continue talking about all important issues,” German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said. He said the two sides had held “very serious talks.”

British Foreign Secretary David Lammy said: “We are keen to continue ongoing discussions and negotiations with Iran, and we urge Iran to continue their talks with the United States.” He added that “we were clear: Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.”

“Military operations can slow Iran’s nuclear program but in no way can they eliminate it, said French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot. “We know well — after having seen what happened in Afghanistan, in Iraq, in Libya — how illusory and dangerous it is to want to impose regime change from outside.”

Barrot also said that European nations ”invited the Iranian minister to envisage negotiations with all parties including the United States, and without waiting for the end of the strikes.”

The French Foreign Minister explained that in discussions with Iran, Foreign Minister Araghchi agreed “to put all the issues on the table including some that weren’t there before” and “showed his disposition to continuing the conversation — that we started today — and for the Europeans to help facilitate, including with the United States.”

EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas said ”we agreed that we will discuss nuclear but also broader issues that we have, and keep the discussions open.”

Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi also addressed reporters outside the meeting venue after the talks ended. He expressed support for “a continuation of discussions with the E3 and the EU and expressed his readiness to meet again in the near future.” He also denounced Israel’s attacks against nuclear facilities in Iran and expressed “grave concern” on what he called “non-condemnation” by European nations.

US considering how to proceed

Lammy traveled to Geneva after meeting in Washington with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and President Donald Trump’s Mideast envoy, Steve Witkoff.

Trump has been weighing whether to attack Iran by striking its well-defended Fordo uranium enrichment facility, which is buried under a mountain and widely considered to be out of reach of all but America’s “bunker-buster” bombs. He said Wednesday that he’ll decide within two weeks whether the US military will get directly involved in the war given the “substantial chance” for renewed negotiations over Tehran’s nuclear program.

Israel says it launched its airstrike campaign to stop Iran from getting closer to being able to build a nuclear weapon. Iran and the United States had been negotiating over the possibility of a new diplomatic deal over Tehran’s program, though Trump has said Israel’s campaign came after a 60-day window he set for the talks.

French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot said that “we wanted to open a discussion with the Iranian foreign minister because we believe that there is no definitive solution by military means to the Iranian nuclear problem — military operations may delay it but they can’t eliminate it.”