FO rejects Indian minister’s claim Pakistan ‘occupied’ Kashmir after 1948 ‘invasion’

Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar arrives at BRICS Summit in Kazan, Russia on Oct. 24, 2024. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 20 March 2025
Follow

FO rejects Indian minister’s claim Pakistan ‘occupied’ Kashmir after 1948 ‘invasion’

  • Pakistan says Jammu and Kashmir an “internationally recognized disputed territory” whose final status is to be determined by its people
  • Urges Kabul government to take “visible and verifiable” action against militants harboring in Afghanistan and launching regular cross-border attacks

ISLAMABAD: The foreign office on Thursday rejected Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar’s remarks that Pakistan was “occupying” a part of Kashmir after “invading” it in 1948, saying the region was an “internationally recognized disputed territory.”

The Muslim-majority Himalayan region of Kashmir has remained a flashpoint between Pakistan and India since their independence from British rule in 1947. Both countries administer parts of the region but claim it in full, having fought three wars over the territory. The part governed by Pakistan is called Azad Kashmir while the Indian part is called Jammu and Kashmir.

Addressing an event in New Delhi this week, Jaishankar called the “occupation” of some parts of Kashmir by Pakistan “the longest standing illegal occupation” of territory by another country after the Second World War. He said Indian had taken the “invasion” to the UN, which had declared it a “dispute,” putting the “attacker and the victim ... on par.”

During a weekly press briefing on Thursday, Foreign Office Spokesperson Ambassador Shafqat Ali Khan said Pakistan was “alarmed” by the increasing frequency of such statements about Kashmir by Indian leaders.

“It was India that took the Jammu and Kashmir issue to the United Nations in 1948,” he told journalists. “Today, it has no right to blame the Security Council and its erstwhile members for the resolutions that were subsequently adopted.

“Repetition of baseless claims cannot deny the fact that Jammu and Kashmir is an internationally recognized disputed territory whose final status is to be determined by its people through a UN-supervised plebiscite, as stipulated in the relevant UN Security Council resolutions,” Khan added.

The spokesperson said Pakistan believed in peaceful co-existence and lasting peace in South Asia would require the resolution of the Kashmir dispute in line with UN resolutions and the aspirations of the Kashmiri people.

He accused India of blocking peace efforts through its “rigid approach and hegemonic ambitions.”

“The anti-Pakistan narrative emanating from India vitiates the bilateral environment and impedes the prospects for peace and cooperation,” the FO spokesman added. “It must stop.”

AFGHANISTAN

During the briefing, Khan also urged the Kabul government to take “visible and verifiable” action against the Pakistani Taliban, Baloch separatist militants and Daesh insurgents that Islamabad says are harboring in neighboring Afghanistan and launching cross-border attacks from there.

His remarks come after a surge in militant attacks in the northwestern Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP) and southwestern Balochistan provinces in recent months. 

Last week, an unprecedented train hijacking by the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) in Pakistan’s southwest killed 31 people, including troops. This was followed by a suicide attack in Nushki that killed five on Sunday. Pakistan said the attacks were carried out by militants who were in touch with “handlers” in Afghanistan.

The Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and other militant groups have also intensified their attacks in KP province, frequently targeting security force convoys and check posts, as well as carrying out targeted killings and kidnappings of security and government officials.

“Indeed, the terrorist threat against Pakistan from terrorist entities including TTP, BLA, and Daesh is our foremost concern,” Khan said in reply to a question during his weekly press briefing.

“We continue to impress upon interim [Afghan] authorities to take visible and verifiable action against them.”

Pakistani government and military officials have variously accused neighboring India and Afghanistan of fueling militancy in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan, claims both New Delhi and Kabul deny.
 


Imran Khan’s party seeks ‘confidence-building measures’ after government’s talks offer

Updated 03 January 2026
Follow

Imran Khan’s party seeks ‘confidence-building measures’ after government’s talks offer

  • PTI says access to jailed founding leader essential for talks to be considered credible
  • Government says it’s ready for dialogue but nothing will happen until Khan favors the idea

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s jailed former prime minister Imran Khan’s party said on Saturday it would only consider the government’s offer for talks credible if it is accompanied by “concrete confidence-building measures,” such as unhindered access to its founding leader in a high-security prison in Rawalpindi.

Last month, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif said the government was fully prepared to hold a dialogue with Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party to address political polarization that has deepened since the downfall of the PTI administration in a parliamentary no-confidence vote in 2022.

PTI has frequently complained about a state crackdown against its top leadership, including Khan and his wife, who are serving prison sentences in multiple cases ranging from corruption charges to inciting violence against state institutions and attacks on government properties.

Sharif’s offer for talks came amid media reports that PTI wanted a dialogue with the government, though he noted that negotiations would not be allowed to proceed on the basis of “blackmailing” or unlawful demands and would only cater to legitimate issues.

“Announcements of talks, without concrete confidence-building measures, cannot be treated as credible progress,” Azhar Leghari, PTI’s central deputy information secretary, told Arab News.

He recalled that Khan had authorized Mahmood Khan Achakzai and Allama Raja Nasir Abbas to carry forward with the dialogue process, adding that talks “require trust, and trust cannot be built at the cost of constitutional rights or democratic legitimacy.”

“For dialogue to be meaningful, it is essential that these authorized representatives are allowed regular and unhindered access to Imran Khan so that any engagement accurately reflects his views and PTI’s collective position,” he added.

Khan’s family, party and legal team have complained in the past they are stopped by the authorities from meeting the ex-PM in prison. Last month, they also raised concerns about his health, prompting the officials to allow one of his sisters to meet him, who said he was fine.

Shortly thereafter, a scathing message was posted on his social media account, criticizing the army chief. Khan’s post elicited a bitter response from the government and the military amid accusations of inciting people against state institutions.

Leghari’s comments came only a day after Rana Sanaullah, adviser to Prime Minister Sharif on political affairs, said PTI’s “second- or third-tier leadership” wanted dialogue, but nothing was going to happen until Khan favored these negotiations.

He also maintained that while the government was ready for talks, “uncertainty and delays from PTI are preventing progress.”

Meanwhile, a newly formed National Dialogue Committee of former PTI leaders told Arab News it had organized a session on Wednesday, January 7, in the federal capital that will bring together all major political parties, journalists, lawyers and representatives of civil society.

“Our goal is to bring political leaders together so that, while discussing their own issues, they can collectively seek solutions to the nation’s challenges,” Mahmood Baqi Moulvi, a Pakistani politician and member of the committee, said.

“The initiative also builds on previous efforts, including a letter to the prime minister requesting confidence-building measures to enable talks with PTI,” he added.

The National Dialogue Committee had urged the government in the letter to grant parole to jailed party figures in Lahore, including former foreign minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi and Dr. Yasmin Rashid, describing the move as vital for building trust ahead of negotiations.

It had also maintained such a step “would not only create an extremely positive, conducive, and trust-filled environment for the negotiations but would also lay a strong foundation for restoring mutual confidence among all stakeholders.”

While the government has also offered dialogue in the past, PTI leaders have conditioned participation on substantive measures, including what they describe as an end to politically motivated prosecutions and arrests, restoration of fundamental rights, respect for judicial independence and a credible roadmap toward free and fair elections.

“Reconciliation is possible, but it must be based on correcting injustices rather than managing optics,” Leghari said. “A genuine reset requires restoring respect for the Constitution, ending political victimization and allowing democratic processes to function without interference.”

Rana Sanaullah and Deputy Law Minister Barrister Aqeel Malik did not respond to requests for comment.