Deporting Mahmoud Khalil from US would fuel wider expulsion campaign against Arabs, Muslims: Attorney

Pro-Palestinian protestors rally in support of Mahmoud Khalil outside of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, where a hearing is underway regarding Khalil's arrest, in New York City on March 12, 2025. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 13 March 2025
Follow

Deporting Mahmoud Khalil from US would fuel wider expulsion campaign against Arabs, Muslims: Attorney

  • Columbia University student, son of Palestinian refugees, was arrested on March 8
  • Real aim ‘is to shut everybody up’ from criticizing Israel, David Chami tells Arab News

CHICAGO: Deporting green-card holder Mahmoud Khalil from the US would fuel widespread persecution and targeting of Arabs and Muslims who “dare to criticize” Israel, a civil rights attorney told Arab News.

David Chami represented 22 of 27 students who were expelled from Arizona State University after being accused of trespassing and damage to property.

But he said neither his 22 clients nor Columbia University student Khalil committed any serious offense that would justify any form of punishment.

“Without a doubt, what ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and the government are doing violates the Constitution and the fundamental laws of this country,” Chami added.

Khalil’s case “could open the door to thousands of expulsions if they want to continue targeting and harassing students.

“I mean, if you start alleging that your opinions about Palestine or Israel are enough for me to associate you with supporting terrorism, all of a sudden everyone’s out, right? Because anyone who’s anti-genocide, who’s against Israeli policies, becomes a target.”

The real aim “is to shut everybody up,” Chami said, adding that under US law, Khalil or any green-card holder would have to be convicted of a “serious crime” before being deported.

“They’re just going to try to throw Mahmoud Khalil out of the country extra-judicially,” Chami said. “If that happens, all of a sudden you’ll start to see green-card holders becoming targeted for their speech, things they said online on social media, and not even being at a protest at all.

“What’s next? They might target former green-card holders who are now American citizens, and people who weren’t born here. They might try to undo their citizenship.”

Chami said green-card holders, who are one step away from becoming official citizens, can only be deported after being convicted of very specific crimes under US immigration laws.

“They include crimes of moral turpitude like fraud, theft, violence, or lying on your application,” he added.

“They’d have to commit some sort of aggravated felony like murder, or drug trafficking, or some other drug offense.

“You could be accused of a crime, but that still wouldn’t provide a basis for deportation. You’d have to be convicted first. … But they aren’t trying to prosecute or convict him.”

Khalil, the son of Palestinian refugees, was born in Syria and holds Algerian citizenship. After earning a bachelor’s degree in computer science from the Lebanese American University, he enrolled at Columbia University in 2022, studying in the School of International and Public Affairs. He completed his studies last December and was scheduled to graduate in May.

Khalil was arrested at his home on March 8 by ICE officers. His attempted expulsion has fueled an atmosphere of anti-Arab hate and Islamophobia that is being parroted by American traditional and social media, Chami said.

Although US District Judge Jesse Furman on Wednesday extended an order that temporarily blocks Khalil’s deportation, Chami said he is concerned that ICE could expel him without completing the judicial process. “The question is, where would they expel him to?” Chami asked.

The American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee called Khalil’s arrest “an extreme and blatant act of political retaliation for his First Amendment-protected advocacy.”

Maya Berry, executive director of the Arab American Institute, said the arrest “is of enormous concern to academic freedom and freedom of speech.”


Israeli firm loses British Army contract bid

Updated 9 sec ago
Follow

Israeli firm loses British Army contract bid

  • Subsidiary Elbit Systems UK’s campaign for $2.6bn program was marred by controversy
  • Senior govt civil servant overseeing contract was dined, handed free Israel tour

LONDON: A UK subsidiary of Israeli weapons giant Elbit Systems has lost its bid to win a prominent British Army contract, The Times reported.

The loss followed high-profile reporting on controversy surrounding Elbit Systems UK’s handling of the bid.

The subsidiary led one of two major arms consortiums attempting to secure the $2.6 billion bid to prepare British soldiers for war and overhaul army standards.

Rivaling Elbit, the other consortium led by Raytheon UK, a British subsidiary of the US defense giant, ultimately won the contract, a Ministry of Defence insider told The Times.

It had been decided following an intricate process that Raytheon was a “better candidate,” the source said.

Elbit Systems UK’s controversial handling of its contract campaign was revealed in reports by The Times.

A whistleblower had compiled a dossier surrounding the bid that was shown to the MoD last August, though the report was privately revealed to the ministry months earlier.

It alleged that Elbit UK had breached business appointment rules when Philip Kimber, a former British Army brigadier, had reportedly shared information with the firm after leaving the military.

Kimber attending critical meetings at the firm to discuss the training contract that he had once overseen at the ministry, the report alleged.

In one case, Kimber was present in an Elbit meeting and sitting out of view of a camera. He reportedly said he “should not be there,” according to the whistleblower’s report.

In response to a freedom of information request, the MoD later admitted that it had held the dossier for seven months without investigating its claims. Insiders at the ministry blamed the investigative delay on “administrative oversight.”

A month after being pushed on the allegations by The Times, a senior civil servant completed an “assurance review” in September and found that business appointment rules had not been breached.

Other allegations concerned lunches and dinners hosted by Elbit UK in which civil servants at the heart of the contract decision process were invited.

One senior civil servant was dined by the British subsidiary seven times, while rival Raytheon did not host events.

Mike Cooper, the senior responsible owner at army headquarters for the army training program, also traveled to Jerusalem with two senior British military officers.

He took part in a sightseeing tour funded by Elbit Systems, the British subsidiary’s parent company.

In response to the allegations, an MoD spokesperson said in a statement: “The collective training transformation programme will modernise training for soldiers to ensure the British Army can face down the threats of the future.

“We will not comment further until a preferred tenderer announcement is made public in due course.”

Amid mounting criticism of Israel within the British military establishment, four former senior army officers, in a letter to Prime Minister Keir Starmer, recently urged the government to end involvement with Israeli-owned or Israeli-supported weapons companies.

“Now is not the time to return to business as usual with the Israeli government,” they wrote, urging harsher sanctions.