Gambian fishing village seeks elusive statehood

A man prepares a fishing net ahead of going out fishing in Brufut, Ghana Town, in this Oct. 31 file photo. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 11 December 2024
Follow

Gambian fishing village seeks elusive statehood

GHANA TOWN, Gambia: As Paul Techy queued with dozens of others in his coastal Gambian fishing village, he hoped to move one step closer toward finally belonging in the only country he had ever called home.

Gambian citizenship has long been an elusive goal for many residents of Ghana Town, most of whom were born in the tiny West African country but whose parents or grandparents emigrated from Ghana decades ago.

Lacking either Ghanaian or Gambian documentation, most are trapped in a legal limbo where they struggle to access basic services such as healthcare or formal employment.

“We recognize ourselves as Gambians, but Gambians don’t recognize us as Gambians,” said 46-year-old Techy, who was born in the village on the shores of the Atlantic.

“They said you are a Ghanaian born in The Gambia, you are still a foreigner ... this is how they categorize us,” he said.

Under The Gambia’s constitution, a person is granted citizenship if they are born in the country — but only if one of their parents is a Gambian citizen.

Ghana Town sprung up in the late 1950s, when a group of Ghanaian fishermen traveled to The Gambia in search of lucrative waters and a better market.

The village’s cinder block and corrugated metal houses are now home to around 2,000 people, including many of the original fishermen’s descendants.

The UN’s refugee agency, UNHCR, says residents are “at risk of statelessness.”

Being undocumented is not the same as being stateless, the UNHCR says, but having no legal records puts people at risk as they cannot prove links to any state.

Together with the Gambia Commission for Refugees, the UNHCR conducted an assessment in November to see if Ghana Town’s residents could be considered for naturalization.

“Most of their fundamental human rights like access to nationality and access to social amenities are somehow difficult,” said Omar T. Camara, a government representative working with The Gambia Commission for Refugees.

A team spent four days conducting interviews with residents such as Techy, after which conclusions and recommendations will be drawn up and sent to lawmakers in the parliament. Camara said the exercise could pave the way for legal reform.

The UNHCR says that statelessness worldwide is driven by a number of factors including discrimination based on race or gender, as well as legislative shortcomings.

It estimated in November that there were nearly a million stateless people in Africa, including more than 930,000 in West Africa, leaving them vulnerable to marginalization and abuse.

Millions more are at risk because of conflicts in the volatile Sahel region, it said.

While The Gambia has ratified two UN conventions on ending statelessness, there is no process for formally recognizing stateless people in the country.

Ghana Town resident Gideon Money, 20, graduated top of his class and won a scholarship to study medicine in India, but said a lack of legal identity prevented him from going.

“My fellow students have left because they are termed as Gambians,” he told AFP.

“For me, when I went to the immigration department, they said I am Ghanaian from Ghana Town and they denied me from getting a passport,” he added.

For those of Ghana Town’s residents who choose to stay, well-paid and stable jobs are often out of reach.

Mary Ennie, 44, said she had graduated from high school but could only make a meagre living as a hairdresser as she did not have a national ID card.

She worried for her six children who also lack legal Gambian identity, despite being born in the country.

Ennie said she even traveled to Ghana three times to try to find work there, but was told she couldn’t as she was classed as Gambian.

Despite being given land when they first arrived, Ghana Town’s residents say they must each pay a 2,500-dalasi ($35) yearly “alien permit” to prevent raids from the immigration department.

They say they also have to pay more money than Gambian citizens for medical care.

Kobina Ekaum, 79, arrived in Ghana Town as a child in the 1950s and went on to become the first “Alkalo,” or head of the village.

“Imagine, since independence, we are still regarded as foreigners,” he said despondently as he sat on a mattress on the floor of his home.


House votes to slap back Trump’s tariffs on Canada in rare bipartisan rebuke

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

House votes to slap back Trump’s tariffs on Canada in rare bipartisan rebuke

WASHINGTON: The House voted Wednesday to slap back President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canada, a rare if largely symbolic rebuke of the White House agenda as Republicans joined Democrats over the objections of GOP leadership.
The tally, 219-211, was among the first times the House, controlled by Republicans, has confronted the president over a signature policy, and drew instant recrimination from Trump himself. The resolution seeks to end the national emergency Trump declared to impose the tariffs, though actually undoing the policy would require support from the president, which is highly unlikely. It next goes to the Senate.
Trump believes in the power of tariffs to force US trade partners to the negotiating table. But lawmakers are facing unrest back home from businesses caught in the trade wars and constituents navigating pocketbook issues and high prices.
“Today’s vote is simple, very simple: Will you vote to lower the cost of living for the American family or will you keep prices high out of loyalty to one person — Donald J. Trump?” said Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who authored the resolution.
Within minutes, as the gavel struck, Trump fired off a stern warning to those in the Republican Party who would dare to cross him.
“Any Republican, in the House or the Senate, that votes against TARIFFS will seriously suffer the consequences come Election time, and that includes Primaries!” the president posted on social media.
The high-stakes moment provides a snapshot of the House’s unease with the president’s direction, especially ahead of the midterm elections as economic issues resonate among voters. The Senate has already voted to reject Trump’s tariffs on Canada and other countries in a show of displeasure. But both chambers would have to approve the tariff rollbacks, and send the resolution to Trump for the president’s signature — or veto.
Six House Republicans voted for the resolution, and one Democrat voted against it.
From Canada, Ontario, Premier Doug Ford on social media called the vote “an important victory with more work ahead.” He thanked lawmakers from both parties “who stood up in support of free trade and economic growth between our two great countries. Let’s end the tariffs and together build a more prosperous and secure future.”
Trump recently threatened to impose a 100 percent tariff on goods imported from Canada over that country’s proposed China trade deal, intensifying a feud with the longtime US ally and Prime Minister Mark Carney.
GOP defections forced the vote
House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to prevent this showdown.
Johnson insisted lawmakers wait for a pending Supreme Court ruling in a lawsuit about the tariffs. He engineered a complicated rules change to prevent floor action. But Johnson’s strategy collapsed late Tuesday, as Republicans peeled off during a procedural vote to ensure the Democratic measure was able to advance.
“The president’s trade policies have been of great benefit,” Johnson, R-Louisiana, had said. “And I think the sentiment is that we allow a little more runway for this to be worked out between the executive branch and the judicial branch.”
Late Tuesday evening, Johnson could be seen speaking to holdout Republican lawmakers as the GOP leadership team struggled to shore up support during a lengthy procedural vote, but the numbers lined up against him.
“We’re disappointed,” Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House’s National Economic Council, told reporters at the White House on Wednesday morning. “The president will make sure they don’t repeal his tariffs.”
Terminating Trump’s emergency
The resolution put forward by Meeks would terminate the national emergency that Trump declared a year ago as one of his executive orders.
The administration claimed illicit drug flow from Canada constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat that allows the president to slap tariffs on imported goods outside the terms of the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement.
The Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, said the flow of fentanyl into the US is a dire national emergency and the policy must be left in place.
“Let’s be clear again about what this resolution is and what it’s not. It’s not a debate about tariffs. You can talk about those, but that’s not really what it is,” Mast said. “This is Democrats trying to ignore that there is a fentanyl crisis.”
Experts say fentanyl produced by cartels in Mexico is largely smuggled into the US from land crossings in California and Arizona. Fentanyl is also made in Canada and smuggled into the US, but to a much lesser extent.
Torn between Trump and tariffs
Ahead of voting, some rank-and-file Republican lawmakers expressed unease over the choices ahead as Democrats — and a few renegade Republicans — impressed on their colleagues the need to flex their power as the legislative branch rather than ceding so much power to the president to take authority over trade and tariff policy.
Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, said he was unpersuaded by Johnson’s call to wait until the Supreme Court makes its decision about the legality of Trump’s tariffs. He voted for passage.
“Why doesn’t the Congress stand on its own two feet and say that we’re an independent branch?” Bacon said. “We should defend our authorities. I hope the Supreme Court does, but if we don’t do it, shame on us.”
Bacon, who is retiring rather than facing reelection, also argued that tariffs are bad economic policy.
Other Republicans had to swiftly make up their minds after Johnson’s gambit — which would have paused the calendar days to prevent the measure from coming forward — was turned back.
“At the end of the day, we’re going to have to support our president,” said Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas.
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said he doesn’t want to tie the president’s hands on trade and would support the tariffs on Canada “at this time.”