US envoy says truce in Lebanon is ‘within our grasp’

US special envoy Amos Hochstein meets with Lebanon's caretaker Prime Minister in Beirut on October 21, 2024 (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 19 November 2024
Follow

US envoy says truce in Lebanon is ‘within our grasp’

  • Amos Hochstein’s comment follows talks with Speaker Nabih Berri and Prime Minister Najib Mikati in Beirut on Tuesday
  • Mikati’s office says the ‘priority is to have a ceasefire and stop the aggression against Lebanon, as well as to preserve Lebanese sovereignty over all Lebanese territories’

BEIRUT: An agreement to end the war between Israel and Hezbollah is “within our grasp,” US envoy Amos Hochstein said after talks in Lebanon on Tuesday.

It followed his meeting in Beirut with Lebanese officials, during which they gave their response to a US-drafted proposal for a ceasefire and diplomatic solution to the conflict, prepared in coordination with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Hochstein will travel to Tel Aviv on Wednesday for talks with the Israelis.

The draft peace proposal focuses on the implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which was adopted in 2006 with the aim of resolving the war that year between Israel and Hezbollah and is overseen on the ground by the UN Interim Force in Lebanon. The proposal includes additional provisions, including “expanding the monitoring committee” overseeing implementation of the resolution, and a leaked Israeli condition “guaranteeing its right to breach Lebanese airspace for reconnaissance and to respond to any Lebanese violation of the agreement.”

Hochstein held extensive talks during a two-hour meeting with the speaker of the Lebanese parliament, Nabih Berri, who has been authorized by Hezbollah to conduct negotiations for a ceasefire. Afterwards, Hochstein said the conversation had been “very constructive and useful.”

He added: “We will reach a solution in the coming days. There is a serious opportunity for a ceasefire and I am grateful for the constructive discussions with Nabih Berri and, later, with Prime Minister Najib Mikati.”

Hochstein, who also met Lebanon’s army chief, said he had returned to Beirut because “we have a genuine opportunity to reach a resolution to the conflict and the decision remains in the hands of the parties involved. The solution is now within our grasp and there is a window of opportunity.”

Tuesday’s discussions “were aimed at narrowing the differences and we will continue with them,” he added.

Mikati’s office said he “reiterated that the government’s priority is to have a ceasefire and stop the aggression against Lebanon, as well as to preserve Lebanese sovereignty over all Lebanese territories. Any measures that achieve this objective are of utmost priority.”

The prime minister conveyed that the “primary concern of the government is the swift return of displaced individuals to their villages and towns, as well as the cessation of the Israeli acts of genocide and the senseless destruction occurring in Lebanese towns.”

He also stressed “the importance of implementing clear international resolutions and strengthening the authority of the army in the south.”

There had been considerable uncertainty on Monday night about whether Hochstein’s visit would proceed. He had a lengthy telephone conversation, lasting two hours, with Berri, after which the latter confirmed the American envoy would visit Beirut the following day.

Also on Monday night, an Israeli airstrike hit a working-class neighborhood of Beirut in which hundreds of displaced individuals were living, killing five people and injuring 35. In response, Hezbollah fired a missile at Tel Aviv, reportedly resulting in human and material losses.

Hezbollah’s media office had announced that the head of the organization, Naim Qassem, would give a speech on Tuesday but the party later said this “has been postponed until a date to be determined later.”

There were several hours of tense calm in Beirut and its southern suburbs during Hochstein’s visit to the city on Tuesday. This followed an Israeli airstrike early in the morning that hit a four-story residential building in Ghobeiry, in the southern suburbs, without warning. Two people were killed and several injured while they slept.

Elsewhere, skirmishes continued between Hezbollah and Israeli army forces in the border villages of Chamaa, Tayr Harfa and Al-Bayada.

Hezbollah said it “repelled eight incursion attempts in the southeastern outskirts of Khiam” and “burned three Israeli military Merkava tanks.”

The Israeli army said it killed “Hezbollah's medium-range rocket system commander, Ali Toufic Al-Doueik, in Kfar Joz.” Israeli raids, carried out without prior warning, destroyed houses in Yohmor Al-Shkeif, Tyre, Bazourieh and Ghandourieh. And areas around the Litani River in the outskirts of Deir Mimas were targeted by Israeli artillery.

A raid on Adloun destroyed a three-story building, injuring seven people. In Qana, Israeli forces attacked a Hezbollah Islamic Health Organization facility, killing two paramedics. One person was killed by an attack in Chabriha and another in Al-Majadel, and three were killed in Maarakeh.

Hezbollah said it carried out a series of military operations in the past 24 hours, including “aerial strikes with attack drones against sensitive Israeli military positions in Tel Aviv.”

The militant group attacked “the Ramat David base southeast of Haifa, and the Beit Lid base, a military base containing training camps, about 90 kilometers east of Netanya.” Other targets included “a paratrooper training base in the Karmiel settlement, Safed, and the Galilot base, headquarters of military intelligence unit 8200, in Tel Aviv’s suburbs.”

The Israeli army said its “98th Division continues its operations in several areas in southern Lebanon” and had “raided a Hezbollah central stronghold.” Officials added that “11 soldiers were injured in southern Lebanon’s conflicts in the past 24 hours.”

The UN Interim Force in Lebanon said its “ability to carry out monitoring tasks in its mission area south of the Litani River has become extremely limited due to the ongoing conflict, which has resulted in the destruction of part of UNIFIL’s infrastructure.”


What the government takeover of Syria’s largest oil field means for energy security

Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

What the government takeover of Syria’s largest oil field means for energy security

  • Interim administration has regained control of Al-Omar oil field after years under Kurdish-led SDF control
  • Production boost raises hopes for recovery, but damage and insecurity limit immediate economic impact

LONDON: After years under the control of the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, Syria’s largest oil field, Al-Omar, and nearby gas fields in the eastern governorate of Deir Ezzor fell to interim government forces in late January.
It was a significant development that officials and industry experts say could benefit the country’s fragile economic recovery.
The interim government announced on Jan. 18 that the Al-Omar facility and surrounding gas fields had come under army control, after the SDF said it would redeploy east of the Euphrates River following more than a week of clashes in the northeast.
Days later, the state-run Syrian Petroleum Co. began restarting oil and gas production at the newly seized fields and routing output to the Homs and Baniyas refineries, the state news agency SANA reported on Jan. 24.
A company source told The Syria Report that oil production west of the Euphrates stood at 10,600 barrels per day. Since the takeover, production has risen to about 26,000 bpd and could reach 45,000 bpd within months, pending maintenance work.
And although experts caution that the takeover is unlikely to deliver immediate relief, it still carries longer-term significance.
Benjamin Feve, a senior research analyst at Karam Shaar Advisory, said the capture of Al-Omar is “not transformative in the short term” but remains “very important” for Syria’s economy.
“Control of Al-Omar and other Deir Ezzor fields gives Damascus revenue potential and strategic leverage,” Feve told Arab News.
“But in 2026, the contribution will be constrained by rehabilitation timelines, transport bottlenecks, and limited refining capacity, which will make the recapturing of the field a stabilizing factor for the budget and energy supply, maybe, but not really a game changer.”
Security risks further complicate the picture.
“We must also take into account the fact that the security situation in Deir Ezzor and around the Al-Omar field is not fully contained,” Feve said. “There are still risks from (Daesh) insurgents.”
Indeed, security briefings to UN bodies and partners of the US-led coalition against Daesh continue to flag Deir Ezzor and the Syrian desert as among the most at-risk areas for a resurgence.
The vast region, once a Daesh stronghold before the group’s territorial defeat in 2019, has seen a rise in “hit-and-run” attacks over the past year, with sleeper cells reportedly concentrated in the Deir Ezzor countryside.
The collapse of Bashar Assad’s regime in December 2024 left a security vacuum in western Deir Ezzor, creating conditions ripe for renewed attacks. By the end of August 2025, the SDF recorded 117 attacks, compared with 73 incidents during all of 2024.
However, recent political and military developments could improve stability.
On Jan. 30, Syria’s interim government reached a deal with the SDF, providing for the gradual integration of Kurdish forces and institutions into the state.
US Envoy Tom Barrack hailed the agreement as “a profound and historic milestone in Syria’s journey toward national reconciliation, unity, and enduring stability.”
In a long post on X, Barrack wrote that the deal paves the way for rebuilding institutions, restoring trust, attracting investment essential for reconstruction, and securing lasting peace.
Ten days earlier, he wrote that the SDF’s “original purpose” as “the primary anti-(Daesh) force on the ground” had “largely expired” as the new government in Damascus is now ready to “take over security responsibilities.”
The agreement followed weeks of violence in the north.
After US-mediated talks stalled over a March 2025 integration deal, clashes erupted in northern Aleppo in January, particularly in the predominantly Kurdish neighborhoods of Sheikh Maqsoud and Ashrafieh.
After government forces took control of the neighborhoods, they launched a broader offensive against the SDF in the northeast, later seizing Raqqa and Deir Ezzor governorates and parts of southern Hasakah.
Facing major territorial losses, the SDF agreed to a truce on Jan. 18 after talks with US officials, though reports of violations continued.
Under the Jan. 30 deal, the SDF is to withdraw from front lines, its fighters are to join the Syrian army, and its administrative bodies are to be integrated into state institutions.
The agreement also provides for the formation of a military division made up of three brigades of former SDF fighters, the coalition said in a statement on X.
Control of prisons and oil and gas fields was transferred from the SDF to the interim authorities as part of the arrangement.
Syria’s oil wealth, though diminished, remains significant.
In 2015, Oil & Gas Journal estimated the country’s proven oil reserves at 2.5 billion barrels and its gas reserves at 8.5 trillion cubic feet.
Before the civil war erupted in 2011, crude production reached about 386,000 bpd, according to the Ministry of Petroleum. Output plunged to between 24,000 and 34,000 bpd from 2014 to 2019, according to Statista.
By 2021, production averaged 85,900 bpd, though only about 16,000 bpd came from fields under the Assad regime’s control. The rest was produced in areas held by the SDF and US forces.
Gas production that year stood at 12.5 million cubic meters per day — roughly a third of prewar levels.
Early in the conflict, Daesh seized much of eastern Syria’s oil infrastructure. By 2014, the group controlled more than 60 percent of national production, producing about 50,000 bpd, which it sold at very low prices on black markets to finance operations, according to the Financial Times.
Years of fighting and neglect badly damaged oil and gas infrastructure, leaving Syria heavily reliant on Iranian supplies until Assad was overthrown in late 2024.
While the transfer of energy assets to the interim government led by Ahmad Al-Sharaa marks a pivotal moment, experts say Damascus faces many hurdles.
“The main constraints are systemic rather than geological,” Feve said, citing “widespread damage at Al-Omar and neighboring assets, degraded well integrity, reservoir mismanagement caused by years of rudimentary extraction, and a largely nonfunctional midstream network.”
He added that “key pipelines and pumping stations linking Deir Ezzor to the Baniyas refinery are out of service,” forcing the government to rely on “costly trucking to transport crude from Al-Omar to Baniyas” in the coastal region.
While Al-Omar produces light, sweet crude suitable for Baniyas, the route is operationally inefficient.
Sanctions-era shortages of spare parts, financing and qualified contractors mean “even basic rehabilitation” will take time, Feve said, “requiring lengthy technical assessments and phased rebuilding rather than a quick restart.”
Economic sanctions imposed by the US, EU, UK, and others since 2011 crippled Syria’s energy sector by restricting trade, financing and investment. Their gradual easing over the past year offers a path to recovery, though progress is likely to be slow.
Even with full rehabilitation, Al-Omar alone would not meet Syria’s total crude oil and production needs, Feve said, noting refinery constraints and mismatches in production.
“Domestic production could significantly reduce imports and improve energy security,” he said, but Syria “will continue to require substantial external supplies of crude oil and refined products for the foreseeable future, especially if no new oil discoveries are made.”
Feve warned that “depending on how much oil was extracted during the conflict — which remains unknown — calculations suggest Syria could potentially run out of oil by 2052.”
“Even in the long term,” he added, “this represents a serious and certain challenge that must be taken into consideration.”
For now, the energy crisis continues to shape daily life across Syria. Power outages last as long as 20 hours a day or more, even in the capital, while fuel for heating, transport, and generators remains scarce or unaffordable for a nation already struggling in poverty.
Any increase in production is likely to be felt gradually, experts say, and Syrians should not expect immediate relief in prices or exchange rates.
“Any ramp-up in production would first affect availability,” Feve said, including fuel for power plants, transport, and generators.
“Retail fuel prices in Syria are already at market levels. So, additional domestic supply would mainly reduce shortages and fiscal pressure from imports.
“A meaningful impact on inflation or the Syrian pound would likely take several months and depends on sustained production, reduced imports, and improved foreign exchange management.”
The price of a liter of octane-95 gasoline in Syria currently stands at about 100 Syrian pounds, or approximately $0.85, according to GlobalPetrolPrices.com. The global average is about $1.31 per liter.
For now, the return of Al-Omar is less about lowering prices than easing shortages over time, but it is unlikely to translate quickly into broader economic relief.