KYIV: Ukrainian politicians and cultural figures on Friday slammed a screening of a Russian-Canadian filmmaker’s war documentary as propaganda, a claim the director denied.
Anastasia Trofimova presented at the Venice Film Festival “Russians at War,” in which she embedded with a Russian battalion as it advanced across eastern Ukraine after Moscow launched its invasion in February 2022.
The screening at the prestigious festival sparked outrage across Ukrainian cultural and political circles against what many consider a pro-Kremlin film that seeks to whitewash and justify Moscow’s assault.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, said it was “shameful” that a “propaganda film” was shown.
In a social media post, he asked why “Anastasia Trofimova, as well as some other Russian cultural figures — a country that kills Ukrainians, our children every day — can work in the civilized world at all.”
Trofimova has said that she wants to show the “absolutely ordinary guys” who are fighting for Russia and that her documentary belies the notion in the West that all Russian soldiers are war criminals.
“I want to be clear that this Canada-France production is an anti-war film made at great risk to all involved, myself especially,” she said in a statement to AFP.
An AFP journalist who saw the film said the soldiers depicted appear to have little idea of why they have been sent to the front.
They are shown struggling to make Soviet-era weapons serviceable, with others chain-smoking cigarettes and downing shots of alcohol amid the deaths and wounds of their comrades.
“The suggestion that our film is propaganda is ludicrous given that I’m now at risk of criminal prosecution in Russia,” Trofimova said in the statement.
“I unequivocally believe that Russia’s invasion on Ukraine was unjustified, illegal and acknowledge the validity of the International Criminal Court investigation of war crimes in Ukraine.”
But for Daria Zarivna, a Ukrainian social activist and an adviser to Yermak, the film sought to “justify the Russian military, which is directly responsible for crimes against the Ukrainian people.”
She also accused Trofimova of a “blatant silencing of war crimes and an attempt to blur the line between victim and aggressor.”
Prominent figures in Ukrainian cinema also slammed the documentary.
“This film may mislead you into believing that it is an anti-war film, one that questions the current regime in Russia,” Darya Bassel, a producer who watched the film at the festival, said in a Facebook post.
“However, what I witnessed is a prime example of pure Russian propaganda,” she said.
She said the film featured soldiers who repeat false Kremlin narratives about Ukrainians being “Nazis,” accusing Trofimova of ignoring Russian aggression against Ukraine since 2014.
Iryna Tsilyk, a Ukrainian filmmaker, called what she said were Trofimova’s attempts to promote a pro-peace message “vomit.”
She also criticized the Venice organizers for choosing to showcase “something that smells so bad.”
According to Trofimova’s website, she has previously made documentaries in Syria, Iraq and the Democratic Republic of Congo that have been broadcast on Russia’s state-run RT television, which has been hit by sanctions from the European Union and the United States.
Ukrainians assail Russian war film at Venice fest
https://arab.news/nuc8g
Ukrainians assail Russian war film at Venice fest
- The screening at the prestigious festival sparked outrage across Ukrainian cultural and political circles against what many consider a pro-Kremlin film
- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s chief of staff, Andriy Yermak, said it was “shameful” that a “propaganda film” was shown
German spy chief warns of Russia threat to 2026 regional polls
- Sinan Selen said hat Germany was especially in Moscow’s sights because it is a central logistics hub of the NATO alliance on the continent
BERLIN: Germany’s domestic spy chief warned Monday that Russia could step up sabotage, cyberattacks and disinformation campaigns next year when the EU’s top economy, a strong backer of Ukraine, holds several regional elections.
Sinan Selen, head of the BfV intelligence service, said in a Berlin speech that Germany was especially in Moscow’s sights because it is a central logistics hub of the NATO alliance on the continent.
Speaking later to AFP, Selen said about Russian disinformation campaigns that “we’ve repeatedly seen that elections play a very significant role here, and as you know we have several state elections in Germany next year.”
Russia is blamed by Western security services for a spate of drone flights, acts of sabotage, cyberattacks and online disinformation campaigns in Europe, which have escalated since its 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
“We are being attacked here and now in Europe,” Selen said in a speech marking 75 years since the founding of the BfV, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution.
“In its role as a logistics hub for collective defense and support of Ukraine, Germany is more heavily targeted by Russian intelligence services than other countries,” he said.
“Above all Russia, as a hybrid actor, is undoubtedly aggressive, offensive and escalating. Its intelligence services employ a wide range of attack vectors from its toolbox.
“A clear sign of a highly dangerous escalation is the preparation and execution of sabotage attacks in Germany and other European countries, for which the Kremlin is considered the primary instigator. There is no sign of any relief in sight.”
Germany next year holds five regional elections, including in the ex-communist east, where the far-right and Moscow-friendly Alternative for Germany (AfD) party hopes to make further strong gains.
Selen, speaking about hybrid threats, said that “every sector of society can be affected, and this will be especially true in the coming year.”
The course of the Ukraine war would also strongly influence the actions of Russia, which Selen said “can scale the intensity of its sabotage operations at will.”
Selen added that “this war of aggression is more than a struggle for Ukrainian territory, it is a litmus test in the ongoing systemic conflict between authoritarianism and democracy in a multipolar and complex world.”








