Polls show Republicans are more likely than Democrats to have a favorable opinion of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

A bus demanding Robert F. Kennedy's participation in a debate drives past a protest near the Israeli consulate, as the Democratic National Convention is held, in Chicago, Illinois, on August 20, 2024. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 23 August 2024
Follow

Polls show Republicans are more likely than Democrats to have a favorable opinion of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

  • While some polls earlier in the year put Kennedy’s support in the double digits, support now hovers in the mid-single digits in most recent polls
  • Kennedy is scheduled to speak in Phoenix on Friday, just days after his running mate openly discussed the possibility that he could drop out and endorse Trump

WASHINGTON: Republicans are more likely than Democrats to have a favorable opinion of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., recent polls show, as allies of Donald Trump urge the independent presidential candidate to drop out and endorse the former Republican president.
Kennedy’s support appears to have declined in recent polls as he struggles to find his political lane in a race reshaped by the departure of Democratic President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris’ nomination in his place. The developments have left relatively narrow room for Kennedy’s presence — or potential departure — to make a difference in the election outcome. Recent polls don’t give a clear indication that Kennedy’s presence in the race has an outsized impact on support for either major-party candidate.
While some polls earlier in the year put Kennedy’s support in the double digits, support now hovers in the mid-single digits in most recent polls. It’s unclear if Kennedy would get even that level of support in the general election, since third-party candidates frequently don’t live up to their early poll numbers when voters actually cast their ballots.
Kennedy is scheduled to speak in Phoenix on Friday “about the present historical moment and his path forward,” just days after his running mate openly discussed the possibility that he could drop out and endorse Trump.
Partisan appeal
In recent months, Americans overall have been split in their views of Kennedy, 70, the son of former US Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy.
About as many people had a favorable as unfavorable view of Kennedy, according to a July AP-NORC poll that was conducted before Biden dropped out of the presidential race last month. That marks a decline from February, when more had a positive than negative view of Kennedy, and about 3 in 10 did not have an opinion.
In the most recent poll, about 2 in 10 US adults didn’t know enough about Kennedy to give an opinion.

Republicans were significantly more likely than Democrats and independents to have a favorable view of Kennedy. And those with a positive impression of Kennedy were more likely to also have a favorable view of Trump (52 percent) than Harris (37 percent).
Kennedy also struggled to endear himself to political independents. Although he is running as an independent presidential candidate, polling shows about 4 in 10 independents did not know enough to form an opinion. Those who did were divided equally between favorable and unfavorable opinions.
The base of support
Kennedy’s appeal largely rested on being an alternative to the match-up many Americans dreaded when Biden was facing Trump in a rematch of the 2020 election won by Biden. A Pew Research Center poll from July found that about half of voters who were supporting Kennedy said the main reason they backed him was because he was neither Biden nor Trump, compared with about 3 in 10 who listed Kennedy’s characteristics or policies.
Harris’ move to the top of the Democratic ticket may have further harmed Kennedy’s prospects. An August Pew poll suggested that Harris has gained support at Kennedy’s expense. She appears to have received the support of some women and non-white voters who previously were considering Kennedy.
About that family name
Kennedy’s initial appeal was largely focused on his family name and his relation to other famed Kennedys, including his father and his uncle, former President John F. Kennedy. CNN polling conducted last summer when RFK Jr. was running for the Democratic nomination found that many Democrats said they’d consider supporting him because of the Kennedy name or his family connections. Many members of the Kennedy family endorsed Biden before he withdrew from the race.
John F. Kennedy remains the most highly rated former president in Gallup’s retrospective approval ratings, and his appeal crosses party lines. Nine in 10 Americans approve of how Kennedy, a Democrat, handled his job as president, according to data from last summer, with Democrats, independents and Republicans in agreement.

News of Robert Kennedy’s potential withdrawal comes a little over a week since a New York judge ruled that he should not appear on the ballot in the state because he listed a “sham” address on nominating petitions. Kennedy has appealed, but has faced several similar challenges around the country.

 


‘Racist’ system sees Muslim, Arab Britons stripped of citizenship at record rates: Report

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

‘Racist’ system sees Muslim, Arab Britons stripped of citizenship at record rates: Report

  • Vast majority are Muslim with Middle Eastern, South Asian or North African heritage
  • People of color targeted at a rate 12 times higher than their white British peers

LONDON: A “racist two-tier system” is resulting in the UK stripping British Muslims of citizenship at record rates, a new report has found.

Published by the Runnymede Trust and Reprieve, the report found that the UK is the only G20 country to strip citizenship en masse, having done so more than 200 times since 2010.

This has taken place on the grounds of “public good,” and has mainly targeted those now detained in Syrian detention centers following the collapse of Daesh.

Compared to Britain, the French government only resorted to the citizenship-stripping measure 16 times between 2002 and 2020.

The report condemned the “secretive” system that allows Britons with dual nationality, or naturalized citizens, to be deprived of their citizenship.

Many have only been vaguely informed of the evidence relating to their individual decision, and the government is not required to inform them that their citizenship has been stripped.

The most high-profile case is that of Shamima Begum, who left London to live in Daesh-held territory as a teenager.

UN experts believe that she was trafficked to Syria, and since having her citizenship stripped, she has resided in a detention center in the country.

The report highlighted the “shocking” racial disparity of existing cases of citizenship stripping, which targeted people of color at a rate 12 times higher than their white British peers.

A Home Office spokesperson described the report as “scaremongering and wrong,” adding that the system is used to “protect the British public from some of the most dangerous people, including terrorists and serious organised criminals.”

The vast majority of former British citizens who were stripped of their citizenship are Muslim with Middle Eastern, South Asian or North African heritage.

The practice of stripping citizenship was previously taboo in the West, after the Nazi government in the Second World War conducted mass removals of the status of German Jews.

From 1973 to 2002 in the UK, no stripping of citizenship took place except in response to cases of fraud, the report found.

Imran, whose sister was stripped of her citizenship, told The Independent: “You’ve got secret courts ... where you’re not allowed to be present. And you’re not allowed to understand what’s being discussed.”

The Runnymede and Reprieve report urged the government to immediately end the practice. The laws that grant the home secretary the power to deprive citizenship should also be abolished, it said.

MP Andrew Mitchell of the opposition Conservative Party told The Independent: “I don’t think it’s for a ‘here today, gone tomorrow’ politician to be able, at the stroke of a pen, to remove someone’s citizenship, much less stick it in a drawer in the Home Office without informing them.”

Labour peer Alf Dubs, who fled Nazi-occupied Czechoslovakia as a child, described the system as “absolutely outrageous” and urged the government to change course.