WASHINGTON: A group of lawyers with deep ties to the Republican Party scrambled over the weekend to rescue an effort to get independent presidential candidate Cornel West on the Arizona ballot, offering one of the clearest examples yet of the GOP’s extensive involvement in furthering the left-wing academic’s long-shot bid.
As a deadline loomed to submit the needed paperwork, two well-known Republican lawyers in the state and a GOP attorney working to get West on the ballot elsewhere learned that two of their would-be electors — Jerry Judie and Denisha Mitchell — were not interested in fulfilling the role. The electors’ decisions led to a barrage of text messages and phone calls looking to keep the operation alive. When those efforts failed, two Republican lawyers visited Judie’s and Mitchell’s homes, seemingly seeking to persuade them to reconsider.
The Arizona Secretary of State’s office said Monday that West did not file the paperwork needed to get on the ballot before Saturday’s deadline.
In a brief interview, West expressed ambivalence about Republican efforts to help him, which Democrats fear could benefit Donald Trump by siphoning away left-leaning voters who would probably support the Democratic nominee otherwise.
“So much of American politics is highly gangster-like activity,” West told The Associated Press on Monday. “I have no knowledge of who they are or anything — none whatsoever. We just want to get on that ballot. And that’s the difficult thing.”
The work by the GOP attorneys appears to be part of a broader effort by conservative activists and Republican-aligned operatives across the country to push West’s candidacy and subvert the integrity of the ballot in the months leading up to November’s presidential election.
“I am officially no longer interested in being elector,” Judie, a 62-year-old retired park ranger for the city of Phoenix, said when an operative working to get West on the ballot texted him and asked if he could meet at a local hotel to sign another document.
Judie told the AP he had been a fan of West since his 20s, drawn to his ideas and passion. He was excited earlier this year when he learned that West was running for president and pursued a chance to be an elector to the progressive’s campaign. Judie began to sour on that idea, however, when President Joe Biden ended his campaign last month, making way for Vice President Kamala Harris to be the Democratic nominee.
“When she was in the driver’s seat, that changed the game,” he said. “That changed everything for me, my family, and the people that I know. It was like magic.”
To qualify for the ballot, Arizona law requires independent presidential candidates to put forward a slate of electors who would cast Electoral College votes for them. After Judie informed the operative that he was no longer interested in representing West’s campaign, he received a series of phone calls, according to call records provided to the AP, from people working on the effort, along with a visit to his house by two Republican lawyers hoping to get West on the ballot.
“I am sorry ... we have been calling the crap out of you,” Paul Hamrick, an attorney who has been involved in getting West on the ballot in other states, said in a voicemail to Judie obtained by the AP. “The reason we have been trying to get in touch with you is we found out in the last 24 hours we have got to have everybody sign a letter that Dr. West has also signed.”
Hamrick then relayed that he knew Judie no longer wanted to be an elector. “Is there anything you can tell me about that or has anyone encouraged you not to be?” Hamrick asked.
Judie said two people came to his door looking to speak with him after he received the voicemail. He didn’t answer or talk to them — assuming they were looking to speak about West — but someone Judie knows spoke with them and they identified themselves as Amanda Reeve and Brett Johnson, two well-known lawyers from the law firm Snell & Wilmer.
Reeve is a former Republican state representative and Johnson is a member of the Republican National Lawyers Association. Reeve and Johnson’s firm has done extensive work for the Republican National Committee, GOP candidates and conservative groups, according to campaign finance disclosures.
Republicans and their allies have worked to get West on the ballot in Arizona, Wisconsin, Virginia, North Carolina, Nebraska, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Maine, all in the hope that West will help boost former President Donald Trump’s chances of winning later this year by pulling support from Harris. West does not need to win a state to serve as a spoiler candidate — a few thousand votes in battleground states could be decisive.
Reeve also called Mitchell after the AP reported Friday that she has signed an affidavit stating that she did not agree to be a West elector and never signed her name to a filing, alleging that the document that was filed in her name was forged.
“We need to get this information in as soon as possible,” Reeve said to Mitchell in a Friday voicemail in which she said her firm represented “the Cornel West campaign.”
“It’s due tomorrow morning,” Reeve stressed.
On Saturday, two people — one resembling Johnson and another Reeve — visited Mitchell’s home, according to footage from her doorbell camera obtained by the AP. The two rang the doorbell and left, not speaking with anyone in the home.
Neither Johnson nor Reeve responded to calls or emails requesting comment for this story.
Mitchell said after the AP story was published Friday — in which said she “didn’t even know what an elector was” and that the paperwork was “forged” and riddled with errors — she received a call from someone who had been handling the West petition work. She missed the call, but when she called back, she was connected to Hamrick.
Hamrick, an Alabama-based attorney, said the allegations against him were “false” when reached Sunday night, but declined to comment further.
Mitchell’s and Judie’s cases are the latest examples of the dubious tactics used to get West on ballots nationwide.
Mitchell, who had been drawn to West’s progressive message before she learned Republican-aligned operatives were working to get him on the ballot, told the AP on Friday that she was unaware who filled out the paperwork in her name, calling it “forged.” She and her husband previously worked for a signature-gathering contractor called Wells Marketing, collecting signatures to get an initiative on the ballot that would raise the wages of tipped workers in Arizona.
Wells Marketing, a mysterious Missouri limited liability company, was also leading the effort to gather the signatures needed to get West on the ballot in Arizona.
Judie, reflecting on his chaotic last three days, said he was left with an uneasy feeling, especially because he still respects West.
“They had only one reason they were doing it,” Judie said. “Just to get him on the ballot so some votes would go to him and not go to other people.”
Republicans scrambled to get Cornel West on the Arizona ballot. The left-wing academic is OK with it
https://arab.news/8fan9
Republicans scrambled to get Cornel West on the Arizona ballot. The left-wing academic is OK with it
- West expressed ambivalence about Republican efforts to help him, which Democrats fear could siphon away left-leaning voters
- “I have no knowledge of who they are or anything — none whatsoever. We just want to get on that ballot," West tells AP
Analysis: Understanding the illegitimacy of Somaliland independence
- Israel’s recognition of Somaliland has drawn condemnation as a violation of international law and Somalia’s sovereignty
- Regional and global critics warn the move risks militarizing the Red Sea and destabilizing the Horn of Africa
LONDON: For 34 years, the breakaway state of Somaliland, which declared independence from Somalia in 1991, has wandered in the diplomatic wilderness, its claim to sovereignty unrecognized by the entire world.
All that changed on Dec. 26 with the surprise announcement by the Israeli government that it was establishing full diplomatic relations with the territory, which occupies a strategically sensitive position along the northern coast of the Horn of Africa, overlooking the Gulf of Aden and the mouth of the Red Sea.
On Dec. 28, Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, took to Facebook to publish the declaration of recognition, signed by himself and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The recognition, it read, had been made “in light of the shared values, strategic interests, and the spirit of mutual respect that binds our people.”
The relationship, it added, “will contribute to advancing peace, stability, and prosperity in the Horn of Africa, the Middle East, and beyond.”
But for the many international critics of the move, including Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, the EU, the UK, China and the African Union, the Israeli recognition of Somaliland’s sovereignty is likely to only increase tensions in an already turbulent region.
Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has claimed that, as the price for Israel’s recognition, Somaliland has agreed to accept Palestinians displaced from Gaza by Israel. The Somaliland regime has denied this, but pro-Palestinian states are not convinced.
On Dec. 27, Saudi Arabia was among 21 Arab, Islamic and African nations that issued a joint statement declaring their “unequivocal rejection of Israel’s recognition of the ‘Somaliland’ region of the Federal Republic of Somalia.”
They rejected “any potential link between such a measure and any attempts to forcibly expel the Palestinian people out of their land, which is unequivocally rejected in any form as a matter of principle.”
Israel’s recognition of Somaliland, they added, constituted “a grave violation of the principles of international law and the UN Charter, which explicitly stipulates the imperative of protecting the sovereignty of states and their territorial integrity.”
There would, they added, be “serious repercussions of such an unprecedented measure on peace and security in the Horn of Africa, the Red Sea, and … serious effects on international peace and security as a whole.”
Much of the rest of the world, including Europe, is in lockstep with the Arab states on the issue.
On Dec. 26, the EU issued a statement in which it “reaffirms the importance of respecting the unity, the sovereignty and the territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Somalia pursuant of its constitution, the Charters of the African Union and the UN.”
It added: “This is key for the peace and stability of the entire Horn of Africa region.”
China, too, has criticized the Israeli move. In a statement, the Foreign Ministry said that “no country should encourage or support other countries’ internal separatist forces for its own selfish interests.”
At a meeting of the UN Security Council on Dec. 29, Khaled Khiari, assistant secretary-general for the Middle East, Asia and the Pacific, relayed Somalia’s indignation at what it called “a deliberate attack” on its sovereignty.
Khiari said Somalia had “also underscored that it would not permit the establishment of any foreign military bases or arrangements that would draw the country into proxy conflicts.”
Somalia declared that “no external actor has the authority” to alter its territorial configuration.
The UK was among numerous countries that spoke up for Somalia, with its charge d’affaires reaffirming his country’s continuing “support for the sovereignty, territorial integrity, political independence, and unity of Somalia.”
The UK, added Ambassador James Kariuki, “does not recognize Somaliland’s independence.
“We maintain that any change to Somaliland’s status depends on mutual agreement between Mogadishu and Hargeisa, through dialogue, and must conform to the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.”
Israel’s Sa’ar, who visited Somaliland on Tuesday, brushed aside the chorus of criticism. “Somaliland was not created this past weekend,” he wrote on Facebook. “It has existed as a functioning state for more than 34 years.
“The attacks on Israel’s recognition of Somaliland are hypocritical. Only Israel will decide who to recognize and with whom to maintain diplomatic relations.”
Netanyahu, meanwhile, has said he only wants to “support a democratic, moderate country, a Muslim country, that wants to join the Abraham Accords.”
But some observers believe Israel may be planning to use Somaliland as a military base from which to attack the Houthis in Yemen. Since 2023, the Houthis have launched several missile attacks on Israel, and Israel has struck many targets in Yemen in response.
Now the Houthis have warned that any Israeli military presence in Somaliland would be considered a target, which puts Somalis in the firing line of a war that has nothing to do with them.
Israel’s act of recognition appears likely to stoke tensions in the region.
For example, relations between Somalia and Ethiopia, its western neighbor, are already fraught following talks between Somaliland and Addis Ababa aimed at giving the landlocked state access to the Red Sea.
Ethiopia lost its own coastline in 1993 when its northern region of Eritrea declared independence.
The plan to give Ethiopia a naval base on Somaliland’s Red Sea coast is bitterly opposed by Somalia, which resents what it sees as its territory being given away.
It has also angered Egypt. Cairo has its own dispute with Ethiopia over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which the country has built on the Blue Nile and which Egypt says is threatening its water supplies.
The region’s current crisis is rooted in colonialism.
Before the European “scramble for Africa,” there was no central “Somalian” state. Instead, a region roughly equivalent to modern-day Somaliland, Somalia, Djibouti, the eastern Ogaden region of Ethiopia and parts of northern Kenya was occupied by scattered groups of Somali-speaking pastoral tribes.
In the 19th century, European powers divided up the area into French Somaliland (Djibouti) in the extreme northwest, British Somaliland (today’s Somaliland), and Italian Somaliland (now Somalia).
The British and Italian-held territories gained their independence in 1960 and came together briefly as the Somali Republic. The union proved fragile, however, and in 1969 ended with the assassination of President Abdirashid Ali Sharmarke and a subsequent military coup.
The leader of the coup was Mohamed Siad Barre, the commander of the army, who declared himself president.
In 1991, widespread anger at the regime escalated into civil war. Barre fled to Kenya (reportedly in a tank loaded with millions of dollars of the state’s money), and the government collapsed.
This was the moment, in May 1991, that political leaders in the former British Somaliland declared independence as the Republic of Somaliland, an entity that until now had received no international recognition.
Abdirahman Sahal Yusuf, former media adviser to the Office of the Prime Minister of Somalia and editor of the Qiraat Somali online news platform, says it is clear that “Israel has no right to recognize Somaliland. It is a move that violates international law.”
In doing so, he told Arab News, he believes Israel has two strategic goals: “Establishing a military base in this region to confront the Houthis, but at the same time there is an agreement to transfer Palestinians to Somaliland, which is a red line.”
Establishing an Israeli military base in Somaliland, he said, “would pose a threat to the national security of Egypt and Saudi Arabia, since this region is very sensitive.
“Israel wants to move its battles to this region, ruining Arab national security and dividing countries. The unity of Somalia must be protected.”
For Abdihakim Kalale, an Ethiopian political and security analyst, “the core issue is not recognition itself. States recognize one another, exchange interests, and recalibrate alliances as part of normal international politics.
“The problem lies in how Israel recognized Somaliland and the assumptions that informed that decision.”
Israel, he told Arab News, “appears to have treated Somaliland as a single, unified separatist movement. In reality, it is neither politically nor socially homogeneous. Fragmentation exists, not only in the east, but also in the west.”
In western Somaliland, two major clans inhabiting territories that represent roughly 15-20 percent of the claimed area have not fully integrated into the Somaliland system.
“These groups are actively pursuing the creation of a separate federal member state aligned with Mogadishu rather than Hargeisa. This alone demonstrates that Somaliland lacks internal political cohesion.”
In the east, the situation is even more fragmented. Here, following clan-based fighting in 2023, “a new federal member state, the Northeastern State of Somalia, emerged from territories internationally referred to as Somaliland.
“This entity is now aligned with Mogadishu and exercises effective control over large areas where the Somaliland government has no presence. These eastern territories account for approximately 40 to 45 percent of the land Somaliland claims.”
Furthermore, he said: “Somaliland is neither institutionally nor socially prepared to be integrated into larger geopolitical frameworks such as the Abraham Accords,” which Netanyahu has suggested is on the cards.
“Israel engaged with a leadership eager for recognition but lacking the capacity to manage the profound internal and regional consequences that recognition entails. This creates a governance vacuum that radical and violent actors are well positioned to exploit.
“There is a real risk that this decision could accelerate radicalization and a region long regarded as relatively stable compared to southern Somalia could, in the coming years, evolve into a new security hotspot.”
Liban Abd Ali, a consultant and former media and communications director in the Office of the Prime Minister of Somalia, agrees that Israeli recognition of the breakaway territory is “a very bad move.
“It’s a violation of a sovereign state and a violation of international laws and norms, and Israel is going to divide Somalia’s territorial integrity, fuel conflicts and destroy domestic cohesion,” he told Arab News.
He believes “the main objective is to forcibly move over 1.5 million Palestinians from their own land to northern Somalia.
“They also want to use this area as a launchpad for their fight against the Houthis in Yemen, and beyond that to control the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea. Israel’s main goal is to destabilize the region by dividing countries.”
