India’s top film development body cancels Israeli cinema festival after protests

Speakers talk to the audience during an event at the National Museum of Indian Cinema in Mumbai on Jan. 20, 2024. (NMIC)
Short Url
Updated 21 August 2024
Follow

India’s top film development body cancels Israeli cinema festival after protests

  • Petition to stop the event in Mumbai said screening Israeli films is ‘totally immoral, unethical, unconscionable’
  • Petitioners include Bollywood star Naseeruddin Shah and Tushar Arun Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi

NEW DELHI: India’s top film-industry development institution canceled on Tuesday an Israeli movie festival after protests by actors and academics in Mumbai.

The event, organized by the National Film Development Corporation was scheduled to be held at the National Museum of Indian Cinema in Mumbai on Wednesday and Thursday.

A petition calling for the NFDC screenings to be canceled at the NMIC said the festival was “shamefully being held at a time, when the entire world is witness to Israeli war crimes, the ongoing Holocaust and the genocide in Gaza, and across all of Palestine.”

Over 1,000 people signed the letter, including Bollywood star Naseeruddin Shah, documentary filmmaker Anand Patwardhan, and author Tushar Arun Gandhi, the great-grandson of Mahatma Gandhi.

Other signees included Achin Vanaik, a retired professor of international relations and former head of political science at Delhi University, and Prof. Ram Puniyani, author and former professor of biomedical engineering affiliated with the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay.

They called on the NFDC to stop the event in the wake of the atrocities committed by the Israeli regime, which since the beginning of its onslaught on Gaza has “murdered more than 8% of the Gazan population ... which clearly constitutes a Holocaust, no less,” the petition read.

“The management of the NFDC & the NMIC should be aware of the fact that the Government of India has consistently voted for a ceasefire, as well has recognised the Palestinian state, as have the overwhelming majority of the nations.

“Thus, at this moment in our collective human history, for the NFDC and the NMIC to be screening Israeli films is totally immoral, unethical, unconscionable, and a travesty of justice to say the least.”

An official from the NMIC confirmed to Arab News on condition of anonymity that the festival “has been pulled down,” but declined to provide more details.

“It’s a relief,” Feroze Mithiborwala, a Mumbai-based activist and member of the India-Palestine Solidarity Front who organized the petition, told Arab News.

“I can’t understand that when the entire world is condemning Israel for its war crimes, when it’s also clear how the government department and NFDC in Mumbai actually go with Israel is beyond us.”

The petition letter was written on Monday and went viral within hours of being sent out.

“Three-four of us got together and created a campaign and it became viral in India, it became viral in Palestine (and) it was picked up by the Palestinian ambassador in Delhi.

“It was picked up by Hindus for Human Rights in the US, and has gone to various parts of the world,” Mithiborwala said.

“Last count, it was at least 1,000 people signed. The people who are leaders of social movements, writers, artists, intellectuals.”

The film director Patwardhan said: “We were horrified that India should be hosting an Israel festival at a time when Israel is perpetrating genocide in Gaza as well as committing atrocities in the West Bank.

“We circulated a protest letter yesterday that was immediately endorsed and signed by over 100 eminent Indian citizens. We then contacted the individual offices of the NFDC both yesterday and today by phone,” he told Arab News.

“We were told over the phone today that the festival has been canceled. This is welcome news and shows that the NFDC is sensitive to public opinion.

“We call upon Indian citizens everywhere to protest any attempt by Israel or pro-Israeli elements to carry out business as usual while a genocide is in progress.”


About 400 immigrant children were detained longer than the recommended limit, ICE admits

Updated 09 December 2025
Follow

About 400 immigrant children were detained longer than the recommended limit, ICE admits

  • A Dec. 1 report from ICE indicated that about 400 immigrant children were held in custody for more than the 20-day limit during the reporting period from August to September
  • Advocates documented injuries suffered by children and a lack of access to sufficient medical care

TEXAS, USA: Hundreds of immigrant children across the nation were detained for longer than the legal limit this summer, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement has admitted in a court filing, alarming legal advocates who say the government is failing to safeguard children.
In a court filing Monday evening, attorneys for detainees highlighted the government’s own admissions to longer custody times for immigrant children, unsanitary conditions reported by families and monitors at federal facilities, and a renewed reliance on hotels for detention.
The reports were filed as part of an ongoing civil lawsuit launched in 1985 that led to the creation of the 1990s cornerstone policy known as the Flores Settlement Agreement, which limits the time children can spend in federal custody and requires them to be kept in safe and sanitary conditions. The Trump administration is attempting to end the agreement.
A Dec. 1 report from ICE indicated that about 400 immigrant children were held in custody for more than the 20-day limit during the reporting period from August to September. They also told the court the problem was widespread and not specific to a region or facility. The primary factors that prolonged their release were categorized into three groups: transportation delays, medical needs, and legal processing.
Legal advocates for the children contended those reasons do not prove lawful justifications for the delays in their release. They also cited examples that far exceeded the 20-day limit, including five children who were held for 168 days earlier this year.
ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment Tuesday.
Hotel use for temporary detention is allowed by the federal court for up to 72 hours, but attorneys questioned the government’s data, which they believe did not fully explain why children were held longer than three days in hotel rooms.
Conditions at the detention facilities continued to be an ongoing concern since the family detention site in Dilley, Texas, reopened this year.
Advocates documented injuries suffered by children and a lack of access to sufficient medical care. One child bleeding from an eye injury wasn’t seen by medical staff for two days. Another child’s foot was broken when a member of the staff dropped a volleyball net pole, according to the court filing. “Medical staff told one family whose child got food poisoning to only return if the child vomited eight times,” the advocates wrote in their response.
“Children get diarrhea, heartburn, stomach aches, and they give them food that literally has worms in it,” one person with a family staying at the facility in Dilley wrote in a declaration submitted to the court.
Chief US District Judge Dolly Gee of the Central District of California is scheduled to have a hearing on the reports next week, where she could decide if the court needs to intervene.