Meta discontinues misinformation monitoring tool amid concerns over Hebrew moderation

Meta originally acquired CrowdTangle in 2016 to enhance content insights for publishers tracking content across platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 15 August 2024
Follow

Meta discontinues misinformation monitoring tool amid concerns over Hebrew moderation

  • Company resisted calls to delay shutdown of CrowdTangle until after US elections, said tool was ‘hard to maintain’
  • Action coincides with allegations that company struggles with content moderation in Hebrew, as previously highlighted by Arab News

LONDON: Meta has announced that it has shut down CrowdTangle, a tool widely used by researchers, watchdogs, and journalists to monitor social media posts in real time.

The decision comes at a critical juncture, with new reports revealing Meta’s ongoing struggles to moderate content in Hebrew, and just months before the US presidential election.

The discontinuation of CrowdTangle, which Meta had announced earlier this year, has sparked protests from researchers and nonprofits, including the Center for Democracy and Technology, the Digital Forensic Research Lab at the Atlantic Council, Human Rights Watch, and New York University’s Center for Social Media and Politics.

These organizations have urged Meta to delay the shutdown by six months, arguing that the tool is crucial for studying the impact of social media on public discourse.

In a joint letter they said that Meta “has a responsibility to ensure that the public, independent researchers, journalists, and policymakers can study and address the impact that platforms and their algorithms are having.”

Meta responded earlier this week, saying that CrowdTangle was being discontinued because it had become “hard to maintain” and “does not provide a representative picture of what is happening on our platforms.”

The company plans to replace CrowdTangle with the Meta Content Library, a new tool that is believed to offer more extensive data, including the ability to analyze comments.

However, access to this tool will be limited to researchers affiliated with nonprofit institutions, who must apply through a third party partnered with Meta.

News publishers and other groups with commercial interests will not be eligible for access.

The letter said: “This decision jeopardizes essential pre- and post-election oversight mechanisms and undermines Meta’s transparency efforts during this critical period, and at a time when social trust and digital democracy are alarmingly fragile.”

Meta originally acquired CrowdTangle in 2016 to enhance content insights for publishers tracking content across platforms such as X (formerly Twitter), Reddit, Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube.

CrowdTangle became a key tool over the years for tracking the flow of information on social media, including viral falsehoods that led to real-world harm.

Its shutdown coincides with a new scandal facing Meta. Reports on Thursday revealed the company’s ongoing difficulties in moderating content related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, particularly in Hebrew.

Arab News earlier this month reported that, despite recent internal policy changes, Meta’s lack of sufficient investment had led to a spike in violent and harmful content, primarily in Hebrew.

A former Meta employee highlighted inequities in Meta’s policies governing hate speech related to Palestine, noting that fear of retaliation for raising concerns about content related to the conflict suggested the company’s priorities were “not about actually making sure content is safe for the community.”

One internal document revealed that Meta’s policies required the removal of statements like “boycott Jewish shops” and “boycott Muslim shops” but allowed the phrase “boycott Arab stores.”


BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

Updated 16 December 2025
Follow

BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

LONDON: The BBC said Tuesday it would fight a $10-billion lawsuit brought by US President Donald Trump against the British broadcaster over a documentary that edited his 2021 speech ahead of the US Capitol riot.
“As we have made clear previously, we will be defending this case,” a BBC spokesperson said in a statement sent to AFP, adding the company would not be making “further comment on ongoing legal proceedings.”
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Miami, seeks “damages in an amount not less than $5,000,000,000” for each of two counts against the British broadcaster, for alleged defamation and violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
The video that triggered the lawsuit spliced together two separate sections of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021 in a way that made it appear he explicitly urged supporters to attack the Capitol, where lawmakers were certifying Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.
The lawsuit comes as the UK government on Tuesday launched the politically sensitive review of the BBC’s Royal Charter, which outlines the corporation’s funding and governance and needs to be renewed in 2027.
As part of the review, it launched a public consultation on issues including the role of “accuracy” in the BBC’s mission and contentious reforms to the corporation’s funding model, which currently relies on a mandatory fee for anyone in the country who watches television.
Minister Stephen Kinnock stressed after the lawsuit was filed that the UK government “is a massive supporter of the BBC.”
The BBC has “been very clear that there is no case to answer in terms of Mr.Trump’s accusation on the broader point of libel or defamation. I think it’s right the BBC stands firm on that point,” Kinnock told Sky News on Tuesday.
Trump, 79, had said the lawsuit was imminent, claiming the BBC had “put words in my mouth,” even positing that “they used AI or something.”
The documentary at issue aired last year before the 2024 election, on the BBC’s “Panorama” flagship current affairs program.

Apology letter 

“The formerly respected and now disgraced BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally, maliciously, and deceptively doctoring his speech in a brazen attempt to interfere in the 2024 Presidential Election,” a spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said in a statement to AFP.
“The BBC has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda,” the statement added.
The British Broadcasting Corporation, whose audience extends well beyond the United Kingdom, faced a period of turmoil last month after a media report brought renewed attention to the edited clip.
The scandal led the BBC director general, Tim Davie, and the organization’s top news executive, Deborah Turness, to resign.
Trump’s lawsuit says the edited speech in the documentary was “fabricated and aired by the Defendants one week before the 2024 Presidential Election in a brazen attempt to interfere in and influence the Election’s outcome to President Trump’s detriment.”
The BBC has denied Trump’s claims of legal defamation, though BBC chairman Samir Shah has sent Trump a letter of apology.
Shah also told a UK parliamentary committee last month the broadcaster should have acted sooner to acknowledge its mistake after the error was disclosed in a memo, which was leaked to The Daily Telegraph newspaper.
The BBC lawsuit is the latest in a string of legal actions Trump has taken against media companies in recent years, several of which have led to multi-million-dollar settlements.