Afghan women protest exclusion from upcoming UN meeting in Doha

Afghan women and girls take part in a protest in front of the Ministry of Education in Kabul on March 26, 2022, demanding that high schools be reopened for girls. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 26 June 2024
Follow

Afghan women protest exclusion from upcoming UN meeting in Doha

  • Women have been facing increasing restrictions since Taliban took over Afghanistan in 2021
  • On Tuesday, Taliban foreign ministry said chief government spokesman will attend Doha talks

KABUL: Afghan women spoke up on Wednesday against their exclusion from an upcoming UN conference in Doha, saying their absence will not improve the deteriorating situation for females in Afghanistan.

Since the Taliban regained control of Afghanistan in August 2021, Afghan women have faced increasing restrictions including on movement, personal attire, as well as access to work and education.

The UN has reportedly agreed to the Taliban’s demands of preventing Afghan women from participating at the Doha meeting on Afghanistan that will start on June 30, and to remove a discussion on gender equality from the agenda.

“When a society cannot be complete without women, how can we expect that such important meetings will have fruitful results without them?” Mahboba Akbar, a former teacher and education activist in Kandahar, told Arab News on Wednesday.

“I think the life, work, education and the future of Afghan women and girls don’t really matter for the people attending the meeting in Doha. Therefore, the meeting is not intended to seek solutions for the problems of all Afghans, but is focusing more on reaching some political agreements.”

The latest development appears to be a part of the UN’s attempts to get the Taliban to attend the third Doha conference, which was set up to discuss the international community’s approach to Afghanistan.

The Taliban were not invited to the first gathering, and UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said they set unacceptable conditions to participate at the second meeting held in February. This included excluding Afghan civil society members from the talks, and for them to be treated as Afghanistan’s legitimate rulers.

No country has recognized the Taliban as Afghanistan’s government, with the UN saying that recognition is almost impossible while bans on female education and employment remain in place.

On Tuesday, the Foreign Ministry in Kabul confirmed their attendance at the Doha meeting, saying that chief Taliban government spokesman, Zabihullah Mujahid, will lead the delegation.

When such political agreements are made, it is usually Afghan women who bear the burden, said Zainab Muwahid, an Islamic scholar who participated in the US-Taliban peace talks in Qatar in 2019.

“Afghan women bear the biggest sacrifices in these political deals,” she told Arab News.

The absence of women will have a negative impact on the outcome of the meeting, Muwahid said.

“Women have exclusive views and experiences that are crucial for sustainable and fair talks. Without their presence, there’s always the risk of increased inequalities and injustices.”

The numerous restrictions introduced by the Taliban have been regarded as some of the world’s most serious violations of human rights. Human Rights Watch highlighted on Tuesday how the abuses “deepen daily.”

“Many Afghan women look to the UN to make things right — to hold the Taliban accountable for their crimes, for making Afghanistan a suffocating prison for women and girls — but have been disappointed by ineffective UN responses,” the rights group said in a statement.

The HRW said a growing number of Afghan women activists in the country and abroad have called on states to boycott the upcoming Doha meeting.

“If Doha 3 moves ahead as planned, the UN will be setting a deeply harmful precedent, betraying Afghan women’s struggle for their rights,” it added.

Samira Rahimi, a schoolteacher in Kabul, said women’s voices are often ignored in major meetings.

“When it comes to big and important meetings, only men participate. We don’t have any representation, our issues are largely ignored,” she said.

“We had hope for the international community to continue supporting Afghan women and their rights. The international community has also failed us a great deal. They don’t care about us anymore.”


Ratcliffe says he is sorry his UK ‘colonized by immigrants’ remark offended some

Manchester United co-owner Jim Ratcliffe stands in front of the former manager Alex Ferguson.
Updated 12 February 2026
Follow

Ratcliffe says he is sorry his UK ‘colonized by immigrants’ remark offended some

  • His comments were condemned ‌by politicians, campaigners and by fan groups at Manchester United
  • Muslim Supporters Club said the term “colonized” was frequently used by far-right activists to frame migrants as invaders

LONDON: British billionaire Jim Ratcliffe said on Thursday he was sorry he had ​offended some people by saying the country had been “colonized by immigrants,” after Prime Minister Keir Starmer joined a chorus of criticism over the remarks.
Ratcliffe, one of Britain’s most successful businessmen, responded to the outcry with a statement saying it was important to raise the issue of immigration, but that he regretted his “choice of language” had caused concern.
The founder of chemicals giant INEOS, and owner of nearly a third of Manchester United, had told Sky News that high migration and people living on benefits were damaging the economy.
Finance minister: Comments were “disgusting”
“You can’t have an economy with nine million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in. I mean, the UK has been colonized — it’s ‌costing too much ‌money,” Ratcliffe said in the interview aired on Wednesday.
“The UK has been ​colonized ‌by immigrants, ⁠really, ​hasn’t ⁠it?” he added.
Starmer said the remarks were wrong and would play into the hands of those who wanted to divide the country. Finance minister Rachel Reeves said the comments were “unacceptable” and “disgusting.”
On Thursday, INEOS issued a statement from Ratcliffe in response to “reporting of his comments.”
“I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe and caused concern but it is important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration that supports economic growth,” he said.
He said he wanted to stress that governments must manage migration alongside investment in skills, industry and jobs to ensure long-term prosperity ⁠is shared by everyone, and that it was “critical that we maintain an open debate ‌on the challenges facing the UK.”
Starmer’s spokesperson said it was right ‌for him to apologize. Asked if an apology about offense caused rather ​than the comments themselves were enough, the spokesperson said ‌questions on the detail of the apology were for Ratcliffe.
Manchester United fans flag up use of “colonized”
His comments were condemned ‌by politicians, campaigners and by fan groups at Manchester United, including its Muslim Supporters Club who said the term “colonized” was frequently used by far-right activists to frame migrants as invaders.
“Public discourse shapes public behavior,” the group said. “When influential figures adopt language that mirrors extremist talking points, it risks legitimising prejudice and deepening division.”
Others noted that the Manchester United first team was largely made up ‌of international players and staff, and questioned whether Ratcliffe should be commenting on British politics when he had moved to the tax haven Monaco.
Before Ratcliffe’s response, The ⁠Mayor of Greater Manchester ⁠Andy Burnham said Ratcliffe’s comments were inflammatory and should be withdrawn.
Immigration debate has intensified
Immigration has consistently been among the top voter concerns in Britain according to opinion polls, and has helped fuel the rise of Nigel Farage’s right-wing populist party Reform UK.
Rhetoric around immigration has hardened in recent years and a wave of protests broke out last summer outside hotels housing asylum seekers. Widespread rioting also occurred in 2024, sparked by false information circulating online that a teenager who killed three young girls was an Islamist migrant.
Sky said Ratcliffe had cited incorrect figures to back up his argument. He said the population had risen from 58 million to 70 million people since 2020. The Office for National Statistics estimates the UK population was 67 million in mid-2020 and 69 million in mid-2024.
The population was around 59 million in 2000. Ratcliffe and his office did not immediately respond to Reuters questions about the figures he ​used.
Farage responded to the comments by saying that Britain ​had undergone mass immigration that had changed the character of many areas in the country. “Labour may try to ignore that but Reform won’t,” he said.