Get with the program or leave, French far-right’s immigration tsar tells civil servants

Fabrice Leggeri, the former director of the European Union's border agency Frontex, joined the RN earlier this year in a major coup for the party and went on to launch a successful run for a seat in the European Parliament. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 25 June 2024
Follow

Get with the program or leave, French far-right’s immigration tsar tells civil servants

  • Leggeri said he was already contacting likeminded public servants he knows from years of working for the French government and the European Union
  • He fired a warning shot at civil servants unhappy at the thought of working for a far-right government

PARIS: French officials unwilling to work with a potential far right government should find a new job, the National Rally’s (RN) immigration tsar told Reuters, as he outlined plans to restrict French citizenship, welfare and health care for new arrivals.
Fabrice Leggeri, the former director of the European Union’s border agency Frontex, joined the RN earlier this year in a major coup for the party and went on to launch a successful run for a seat in the European Parliament.
He quit Frontex in 2022 after accusations, which Leggeri has dismissed, that the agency mistreated migrants under his watch.
In an interview on Monday, just days before a two-round legislative election that polls show could catapult the euroskeptic, anti-immigrant RN to power, Leggeri said he was already contacting likeminded public servants he knows from years of working for the French government and the European Union to build a potential RN government. He said others had approached him with offers to help.
Leggeri also fired a warning shot at civil servants unhappy at the thought of working for a far-right government.
“People who aren’t happy need to know that they can leave,” he said, adding those who support “the Trotskyists” and don’t want to work for RN prime ministerial candidate Jordan Bardella can “go back to help the Trotskyists to prepare their program.”
Leggeri echoed policy proposals made by Bardella in a speech on Monday, saying the RN would prioritize a reform to restrict French citizenship rights to make them harder to acquire for those with foreign-born parents, “drastically reduce” immigrant welfare payments, curtail their health care rights and plan a constitutional referendum to toughen immigration laws.
Bardella also said the RN planned to ban dual nationals from certain sensitive jobs in security or defense.

PUSHING FOR CHANGE
Leggeri acknowledged that France has to abide by European law when it comes to immigration policy, leaving it with little room to maneuver. However, he said now is the time to capitalize on a shift to the right in countries such as Italy and the Netherlands to try to change the mindset in Brussels to toughen EU rules.
“We must show with a strong voice in Brussels that France is not alone. There are lots of European countries that want stricter immigration policies,” he said. “The first steps for taking back control are taking advantage of this moment ... to demonstrate force and exercise pressure.”
There are about 7 million immigrants living in France, or about 10.3 percent of the population, with numbers rising steadily since 2000. The RN has long argued that mass immigration is draining France’s coffers and threatening its identity.
Bardella has said immigration costs France 40 billion euros ($42.84 billion) a year, but economists warn that estimate is fanciful as calculating the true costs is almost impossible.
Leggeri, who said he did not expect a ministerial position in an RN government, said he hoped to cut social benefits for immigrants.
“That’s a way we can retake control of our border by reducing the attractiveness for people who are just looking for social aid,” he said.
Additionally, illegal immigrants would only be offered health care in life-threatening situations, he said.
Leggeri said the RN’s plans for a referendum on changes to the constitution to toughen immigration laws would be difficult if Bardella is prime minister while Emmanuel Macron is president, a rare and politically fraught phenomenon known as “cohabitation.”
He said he would like asylum seekers to be forced to apply for refuge at consuls of European Union nations outside the bloc, giving the EU time to build asylum processing centers outside its borders.
“That would allow us to be extremely firm at the physical border when they arrive, and tell them, ‘You won’t receive anything,’” he said.


Judge bars federal prosecutors from seeking the death penalty against Luigi Mangione

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Judge bars federal prosecutors from seeking the death penalty against Luigi Mangione

  • Judge Margaret Garnett’s Friday ruling foiled the Trump administration’s bid to see Mangione executed
  • Garnett dismissed a federal murder charge against Mangione, finding it technically flawed. She left in place stalking charges that could carry a life sentence
NEW YORK: Federal prosecutors can’t seek the death penalty against Luigi Mangione in the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, a federal judge ruled Friday, foiling the Trump administration’s bid to see him executed for what it called a “premeditated, cold-blooded assassination that shocked America.”
Judge Margaret Garnett dismissed a federal murder charge that had enabled prosecutors to seek capital punishment, finding it technically flawed. She wrote that she did so to “foreclose the death penalty as an available punishment to be considered by the jury” as it weighs whether to convict Mangione.
Garnett also dismissed a gun charge but left in place stalking charges that carry a maximum punishment of life in prison. To seek the death penalty, prosecutors needed to show that Mangione killed Thompson while committing another “crime of violence.” Stalking doesn’t fit that definition, Garnett wrote in her opinion, citing case law and legal precedents.
In a win for prosecutors, Garnett ruled they can use evidence collected from his backpack during his arrest, including a 9mm handgun and a notebook in which authorities say Mangione described his intent to “wack” an insurance executive. Mangione’s lawyers had sought to exclude those items, arguing the search was illegal because police hadn’t yet obtained a warrant.
During a hearing Friday, Garnett gave prosecutors 30 days to update her on whether they’ll appeal her death penalty decision. A spokesperson for the US attorney’s office in Manhattan, which is prosecuting the federal case, declined to comment.
Garnett acknowledged that the decision “may strike the average person — and indeed many lawyers and judges — as tortured and strange, and the result may seem contrary to our intuitions about the criminal law.” But, she said, it reflected her “committed effort to faithfully apply the dictates of the Supreme Court to the charges in this case. The law must be the Court’s only concern.”
Mangione, 27, appeared relaxed as he sat with his lawyers during the scheduled hearing, which took place about an hour after Garnett issued her written ruling. Prosecutors retained their right to appeal but said they were ready to proceed to trial.
Outside court afterward, Mangione attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo said her client and his defense team were relieved by the “incredible decision.”
Jury selection in the federal case is set for Sept. 8, followed by opening statements and testimony on Oct. 13. The state trial’s date hasn’t been set. On Wednesday, the Manhattan district attorney’s office urged the judge in that case to schedule a July 1 trial date.
“That case is none of my concern,” Garnett said, adding that she would proceed as if the federal case is the only case unless she hears formally from parties involved in the state case. She also said the federal case will be paused if the government appeals her death penalty ruling.
Thompson, 50, was killed on Dec. 4, 2024, as he walked to a midtown Manhattan hotel for UnitedHealth Group’s annual investor conference. Surveillance video showed a masked gunman shooting him from behind. Police say “delay,” “deny” and “depose” were written on the ammunition, mimicking a phrase used by critics to describe how insurers avoid paying claims.
Mangione, an Ivy League graduate from a wealthy Maryland family, was arrested five days later at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania, about 230 miles (about 370 kilometers) west of Manhattan.
Following through on Trump’s campaign promise to vigorously pursue capital punishment, Attorney General Pam Bondi ordered Manhattan federal prosecutors last April to seek the death penalty against Mangione.
It was the first time the Justice Department sought the death penalty in President Donald Trump’s second term. He returned to office a year ago with a vow to resume federal executions after they were halted under his predecessor, President Joe Biden.
Garnett, a Biden appointee and former Manhattan federal prosecutor, ruled after hearing oral arguments earlier this month.
Besides seeking to have the death penalty rejected on the grounds Garnett cited, Mangione’s lawyers argued that Bondi’s announcement flouted long-established Justice Department protocols and was “based on politics, not merit.”
They said her remarks, followed by posts to her Instagram account and a TV appearance, “indelibly prejudiced” the grand jury process resulting in his indictment weeks later.
Prosecutors urged Garnett to keep the death penalty on the table, arguing that the charges were legally sound and Bondi’s remarks weren’t prejudicial, as “pretrial publicity, even when intense, is not itself a constitutional defect.”
Prosecutors argued that careful questioning of prospective jurors would alleviate the defense’s concerns about their knowledge of the case and ensure Mangione’s rights are respected at trial.
“What the defendant recasts as a constitutional crisis is merely a repackaging of arguments” rejected in previous cases, prosecutors said. “None warrants dismissal of the indictment or categorical preclusion of a congressionally authorized punishment.”