Paris nightclubs accused of discriminating against Arabs and Black people

The managers of the nightclubs denied allegations of discrimination when contacted by Mediapart, but admitted they do filter customers based on perceptions of their financial means. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 07 June 2024
Follow

Paris nightclubs accused of discriminating against Arabs and Black people

  • French newspaper alleges venues L’Aquarium and L’Arc Paris charged customers of North African and sub-Saharan origin significantly more for entry
  • In a test by a nongovernmental organization, neither nightclub refused entry to anyone but seemed to impose costly extra purchase requirements on people of ethnic origin

LONDON: Two popular Paris nightclubs are facing fresh allegations of discrimination against Arab and Black people, after a newspaper published the results of an investigation into the treatment of customers from ethnic groups.

Mediapart reported on Wednesday that the clubs appeared to charge some people more for entry based on the color of their skin. The story used research carried out by a nongovernmental organization SOS Racisme that sent three groups of people to the nightclubs. Each group included two men and a woman of the same age group, wearing clothes that met the clubs’ dress codes. The members of the first group appeared to be of North African origin, those in second of sub-Saharan origin, and the people in the third group were white.

While neither nightclub refused entry to any of the groups, they imposed additional conditions on the Arab and Black groups, such as the purchase of a bottle of alcohol or paying for a table at prices significantly higher than the basic entry fee.

According to Mediapart, this meant the sub-Saharan group had to pay €180 ($196) to get into L’Aquarium, compared with €25 for the white people. Figures for the group perceived as having North African origins were not immediately available.

Meanwhile at L’Arc Paris, the North African group had to pay €800 for entry, while the group of black people were charged €500. In contrast, the white group paid €50 for men and €30 for women.

The NGO accused the nightclubs of charging prices “according to whether you like the look of the customer” and said that the prices were “much higher” for people from ethnic groups.

Dominique Sopo, SOS Racisme’s president, told Mediapart: “This simply shows that there is a bias, there is a difference in treatment between, on the one hand, Black people and Arabs, or in any case people who will be considered as such, and on the other hand, white people.

“And this shows that prejudices, whether conscious or unconscious, continue to be operative.”

Mediapart said it would file a complaint with authorities in Paris over the actions of the clubs. However, previous investigations into the two venues in response to similar accusations were closed because the evidence was found to be “not sufficient” to proceed. Authorities in Paris said a new civil case would be opened if a fresh complaint is filed.

The managers of the nightclubs denied allegations of discrimination when contacted by Mediapart, but admitted they do filter customers based on perceptions of their financial means.

In 2017, SOS Racisme accused several nightclubs in Paris and Nice of racial discrimination after groups of clubbers from ethnic groups were refused entry, only for white people to be allowed in moments later.


Foreign media group slams Israel for refusing to lift Gaza press ban

Updated 07 January 2026
Follow

Foreign media group slams Israel for refusing to lift Gaza press ban

  • Foreign Press Association expresses 'profound disappointment' with Israeli government’s response to a Supreme Court appeal
  • Israel has barred foreign journalists from independently entering the devastated territory since the war started

JERUSALEM: An international media association on Tuesday criticized the Israeli government for maintaining its ban on unrestricted media access to Gaza, calling the move disappointing.
The government had told the Supreme Court in a submission late Sunday that the ban should remain in place, citing security risks in the Gaza Strip.
The submission was in response to a petition filed by the Foreign Press Association (FPA) — which represents hundreds of journalists in Israel and Palestinian territories — seeking immediate and unrestricted access for foreign journalists to the Gaza Strip.
“The Foreign Press Association expresses its profound disappointment with the Israeli government’s latest response to our appeal for full and free access to the Gaza Strip,” the association said on Tuesday.
“Instead of presenting a plan for allowing journalists into Gaza independently and letting us work alongside our brave Palestinian colleagues, the government has decided once again to lock us out” despite the ceasefire in the territory, it added.
Since the outbreak of the Gaza war in October 2023, triggered by an attack on Israel by the Palestinian militant group Hamas, the government has barred foreign journalists from independently entering the devastated territory.
Instead, Israel has allowed only a limited number of reporters to enter Gaza on a case-by-case basis, embedded with its military inside the blockaded Palestinian territory.
The FPA filed its petition in 2024, after which the court granted the government several extensions to submit its response.
Last month, however, the court set January 4 as a final deadline for the government to present a plan for allowing media access to Gaza.
In its submission, the government maintained that the ban should remain in place.
“This is for security reasons, based on the position of the defense establishment, which maintains that a security risk associated with such entry still exists,” the government submission said.
The government also said that the search for the remains of the last hostage held in Gaza was ongoing, suggesting that allowing journalists in at this stage could hinder the operation.
The remains of Ran Gvili, whose body was taken to Gaza after he was killed during Hamas’s 2023 attack, have still not been recovered despite the ceasefire.
The FPA said it planned to submit a “robust response” to the court, and expressed hope the “judges will put an end to this charade.”
“The FPA is confident that the court will provide justice in light of the continuous infringement of the fundamental principles of freedom of speech, the public’s right to know and free press,” the association added.
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a ruling on the matter, though it is unclear when a decision will be handed down.
An AFP journalist sits on the board of the FPA.