UN body to consider call for halt to arm sales to Israel

1 / 2
A Palestinian woman reacts as she sits amid the rubble of Gaza's Al-Shifa hospital after the Israeli military withdrew from the complex housing the hospital on April 1, 2024. (AFP)
2 / 2
Palestinians inspect damages at Al-Shifa Hospital after Israeli forces withdrew from the hospital and the area around it following a two-week operation. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 04 April 2024
Follow

UN body to consider call for halt to arm sales to Israel

  • Pakistan brought forward the draft resolution on behalf of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation 
  • US envoy warns Iran not to attack Americans over Damascus strike

NEW YORK CITY: The UN Human Rights Council on Friday is set to consider a draft resolution calling for a cessation of arms sales to Israel, nearly six months into the war in Gaza.

If the text is adopted, it would mark the first time that the UN’s top rights body has taken a position on the bloodiest-ever Gaza war.

The draft resolution circulated on Wednesday condemns the “use of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare in Gaza” and demands Israel “uphold its legal responsibility to prevent genocide.”

The draft resolution was brought forward by Pakistan on behalf of 55 of the 56 UN member states in the Organization of Islamic Cooperation — the exception being Albania.

The text is co-sponsored by Bolivia, Cuba and the Palestinian mission in Geneva.

The draft demands Israel end its occupation of Palestinian territory and “immediately lift its blockade on the Gaza Strip and all other forms of collective punishment”.

It “calls upon all states to cease the sale, transfer and diversion of arms, munitions and other military equipment to Israel ... in order to prevent further violations of international humanitarian law and violations and abuses of human rights.”

Meanwhile, the US has warned Iran not to retaliate against it for an attack on Iran’s mission compound in Syria, telling the UN Security Council it had no prior warning of the strike that Tehran has blamed on Washington’s ally Israel.

US representative to the UN Robert Wood reiterated that Washington has communicated to Iran that it “had no involvement” in the strike on the consulate, nor did it have any knowledge of it ahead of time.

Wood said that since the Oct. 7 Hamas attacks on Israel, the US has repeatedly warned Iran not to take advantage of the situation by escalating its “longstanding proxy war against Israel and other actors,” but Iran has ignored that warning.

He warned that US authorities “will not hesitate to defend our personnel, and repeat our prior warnings to Iran and its proxies not to take advantage of this situation to resume their attacks on US personnel.”

Tehran’s deputy representative to the UN, Zahra Ershadi, said: “Iran has exercised considerable restraint but there are limits to our forbearance.”

Celebrity chef Jose Andres said that an Israeli attack that killed seven of his food aid workers in Gaza had targeted them “systematically, car by car.”

Andres said the World Central Kitchen charity group he founded had clear communication with the Israeli military, which he said knew his aid workers’ movements.

Separately, Belgian Foreign Minister Hadja Lahbib said her country would consider recognizing Palestine as a sovereign state “when the moment comes.”

Battleground: Jerusalem
The biblical battle for the Holy City

Enter


keywords

New Zealand mosque killer appeal causing ‘distress’ to victims: lawyer

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

New Zealand mosque killer appeal causing ‘distress’ to victims: lawyer

WELLINGTON: Appeal hearings for a white supremacist who shot dead 51 people at two New Zealand mosques in 2019 caused “immense distress” to his victims, a lawyer representing the state said Friday as proceedings wrapped up.
Brenton Tarrant, a 35-year-old Australian former gym instructor, admitted carrying out New Zealand’s deadliest modern-day mass shooting before being sentenced to life in jail in August 2020.
The convicted killer argued this week in Wellington’s Court of Appeal that “torturous and inhumane” detention conditions had made him incapable of making rational decisions when he pleaded guilty, according to a court synopsis of the case.
As a week of hearings came to a close on Friday, Crown lawyer Madeleine Laracy urged the court to dismiss Tarrant’s case because he had no legal defense to offer at trial and conviction was certain, state broadcaster RNZ reported.
She urged the court to give closure to the victims and the wider Muslim community.
“There are literally hundreds of directly harmed victims in this case and keeping this case alive is a source of immense distress for those individuals,” Laracy said, according to RNZ.
The three judges did not give a decision on Friday in his case.
Tarrant is being held in a specialist unit for prisoners of extreme risk at Auckland Prison, seldom interacting with inmates or other people.

- Life sentence -

On Monday, he gave evidence via video link and said he did not have the “mind frame or mental health required” to give an informed guilty plea in 2020.
But Laracy told the three-judge panel on Friday that Tarrant was always going to end up in prison whether he had pleaded guilty or not.
“He was between a rock and a rock,” she said.
Tarrant’s lawyers, whose names are suppressed for security reasons, said his prison conditions were unlike anything else in the system.
If the court upholds Tarrant’s conviction, it will also need to consider an appeal against his sentence.
If his conviction is overturned, the case will be sent to the High Court for a retrial.
Armed with an arsenal of semi-automatic weapons, Tarrant attacked worshippers at two mosques in Christchurch on March 15, 2019.
He published an online manifesto before the attacks and then livestreamed the killings for 17 minutes.
His victims were all Muslim and included children, women and the elderly.
His penalty of life imprisonment without parole was the stiffest in New Zealand history.
There were heavy restrictions on who could be in court during the appeal hearing, with only counsel, media and court officials allowed.
Families and friends of those killed or wounded in the attacks were invited to watch proceedings in Christchurch remotely by video with a one-hour delay.