Saudi PIF ranked 2nd among GCC’s sovereign wealth funds with $925bn in assets

The organization has surged past Kuwait’s sovereign wealth fund in the ranking. Shutterstock
Short Url
Updated 19 March 2024
Follow

Saudi PIF ranked 2nd among GCC’s sovereign wealth funds with $925bn in assets

RIYADH: Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund has soared in an annual global ranking of sovereign wealth organizations, thanks to a 55 percent increase in assets under management.

The value of PIF’s portfolio now stands at $925 billion, according to US-based Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute, up from $595.6 billion in 2022.

This means the organization has surged past Kuwait’s sovereign wealth fund on this metric, and is now only behind Abu Dhabi Investment Authority in the Gulf region.

This climb was further bolstered by PIF’s deal in March where it raised its stake in Aramco by 8 percent to approximately $328 billion. This move represents 37 percent of its portfolio and elevates it to fifth place overall in the global sovereign wealth funds rankings. 

“The value of the Aramco stake could grow as the government releases more shares to the public, which will help boost PIF’s financial clout and its credit rating as it helps develop on the Vision 2030 ambitions,” SWFI stated.  

According to the Global SWF, the Saudi sovereign fund’s ability to access borrowing markets is vital for achieving its objectives. Estimates by the institute suggest PIF’s total debt stands at approximately $36 billion, with recent fundraising of $7 billion from two sales in the early months of 2024. 

In its March report, the industry specialist added that PIF became the world’s largest sovereign investor in 2023, deploying $31.6 billion across 49 deals, a 33 percent increase from 2022. 

In January, PIF acquired a 23.1 percent stake in the Middle East Paper Co. for SR522 million ($139.1 million), enhancing Mepco’s growth and bolstering its role as a regional provider of paper products for construction while strengthening the local supply chain. 

Additionally, the fund entered the transportation sector, launching Riyadh Air with a $30 billion investment in 2023, and investing in Saudia Technic for aviation services.   

PIF is set to finalize the acquisition of the Saudi Iron and Steel Co., also known as Hadeed, from SABIC for $3.3 billion. Collaborating with South Korea’s POSCO, the wealth fund is also promoting green hydrogen production, aiming to foster a low-carbon steel sector. 

PIF’s ambitious goal is to manage $2 trillion in assets by 2030, with 83 percent in domestic holdings. 

Meanwhile, the UAE’s Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, also known as ADIA, maintained its formidable presence this year, securing the leading position in the region with assets under management totaling $993 billion, a significant increase from $790 billion in 2022.  

In third position among Gulf states, the Kuwait Investment Authority showcased a total of $846 billion in assets, up from $750 billion in 2022. 

Qatar also upheld its standing as the fourth largest sovereign wealth fund in the region, with the Qatar Investment Authority reporting a 7.36 percent increase from $475 billion to $510 billion in assets in 2024. 

As per the Global SWF, Middle Eastern wealth funds oversee $4.8 trillion in financial capital. Out of the 60 mega-deals recorded in 2022, Gulf funds executed 25, with only 17 involving US or European businesses. 

In the fifth place for the region, Investment Corp. of Dubai boasted a total of $341 billion in assets followed by Abu Dhabi’s Mubadala and Developmental Holding Co., known as ADQ, reaching $276 billion and $199 billion, respectively. 

Saudi Arabia’s National Development Fund secured the eighth position across the Gulf, reporting $132 billion, followed by the Emirates Investment Authority with $91 billion and Dubai World with a total of $47 billion. 


Supply chains reel as carriers halt Gulf routes and impose war risk surcharges in response to Iran-US conflict

Updated 11 min 38 sec ago
Follow

Supply chains reel as carriers halt Gulf routes and impose war risk surcharges in response to Iran-US conflict

RIYADH: Global supply chains were disrupted on March 2 as the US-Iran conflict forced shipping lines and airlines to suspend routes, reroute traffic, and impose emergency surcharges across the Middle East.

As traffic slowed through the Strait of Hormuz and airspace restrictions spread across Gulf hubs, logistics providers halted new container bookings and adjusted operations, driving longer transit times, higher freight costs, and greater uncertainty for cargo owners worldwide.

Ship-tracking data cited by Reuters showed a maritime standstill taking shape near the Hormuz chokepoint, with roughly 150 crude and liquefied natural gas tankers anchored in open waters beyond the strait and additional vessels stationary on both sides, clustered near the coasts of Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait, as well as the UAE and Qatar.

Industry guidance warned of heightened naval activity, anchorage congestion and potential insurance volatility, even as no formal international suspension of commercial shipping had been declared.

Rising tensions in the Gulf forced operational pullbacks, with Reuters reporting at least three tankers damaged and one seafarer killed, prompting shipowners to reassess their exposure in regional waters.

Container carriers acted to limit risk, with MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. suspending new bookings for Middle East cargo amid security concerns and network uncertainty.

A.P. Moller–Maersk paused sailings through the Suez Canal and Bab el-Mandeb and suspended vessel crossings through the Strait of Hormuz, attributing the move to the worsening security situation following the start of the US-Israeli attack on Iran.

Rival operators began diverting vessels around the Cape of Good Hope, extending voyage times between Asia and Europe and tightening effective capacity. The longer routings are increasing fuel consumption and disrupting equipment repositioning cycles, adding strain to already stretched container availability in key export markets.

Freight costs rose further after Hapag-Lloyd introduced a formal War Risk Surcharge for cargo moving to and from the Upper Gulf, Arabian Gulf and Persian Gulf, citing what it described as the “dynamic situation around the Strait of Hormuz” and associated operational adjustments across its network.

The surcharge, effective March 2 until further notice, is set at $1,500 per twenty-foot equivalent unit for standard containers and $3,500 per unit for reefer containers and special equipment.  

The surcharge will apply to any booking made on or after March 2 that has not yet shipped, as well as cargo already in transit to or from affected Gulf regions. It will be paid by the booking party and excludes shipments regulated by the Federal Maritime Commission or SSE.

France-based shipping group CMA CGM said March 2 it will introduce an “Emergency Conflict Surcharge,” effective immediately, citing escalating security risks in the region. The surcharge will be set at $2,000 per 20-foot dry container, $3,000 per 40-foot dry container, and $4,000 per reefer or special equipment container.  

The measure applies to cargo moving to and from Iraq, Bahrain, and Kuwait, as well as Yemen, Qatar, Oman, the UAE, and Saudi Arabia. It also covers shipments to Jordan, Egypt via the Port of Ain Sokhna, Djibouti, Sudan, and Eritrea, encompassing trade linked to Gulf and Red Sea countries.

On the port side, DP World said operations had resumed at Jebel Ali Port in the UAE following precautionary disruption. The reopening restored activity at the Gulf’s largest transshipment hub, though the broader impact of rerouted vessels, suspended bookings and insurance constraints continues to limit throughput predictability.

Marine insurers added to the strain by issuing notices canceling war-risk cover for vessels operating in Iranian waters and surrounding areas, with changes taking effect on March 5.

The withdrawal of coverage complicates voyage approvals and introduces further pricing volatility for shipowners and charterers considering calls within the region.

Air freight networks have also been affected. Widespread flight cancellations and airspace restrictions across the Middle East disrupted passenger and cargo flows through key hubs, including Dubai.  

FedEx said it had temporarily suspended services in specific Middle East markets, including Bahrain, Israel, and Qatar, as well as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, and the UAE, and halted pickup and delivery services in several Gulf countries due to escalating tensions and airspace closures, affecting time-sensitive shipments across several nations.

Shipping group NORDEN said it has suspended all new business requiring transit through the Strait of Hormuz, citing the escalating security situation in the region, according to a company statement.

Air cargo disruption appears to be significant. Ryan Petersen, CEO of Flexport, a US multinational corporation that focuses on supply chain management and logistics, wrote on X on March 2 that “18 percent of global air freight capacity has been taken out of the market by conflict in the Middle East this weekend,” highlighting the scale of network dislocation as airspace closures and flight cancellations ripple across Gulf hubs.

While the figure has not been independently verified, it underscores the degree to which capacity constraints are tightening for time-sensitive shipments, including pharmaceuticals, electronics and industrial components.

Data from Lloyd’s List Intelligence underscores the scale of disruption to maritime throughput. Daily deadweight tonnage of tankers and gas carriers transiting the Strait of Hormuz fell sharply by March 1, reflecting what industry sources describe as a de facto halt in normal vessel movements.

The combined effect of halted transits, booking suspensions, war-risk pricing measures and air service interruptions is beginning to ripple through global supply chains. Energy exports remain the most immediately exposed given the strategic importance of the Strait of Hormuz, but sectors dependent on just-in-time inventory, from manufacturing to retail, are also facing longer lead times and rising logistics costs.

As of March 2, carriers and freight operators were prioritizing crew safety and asset protection while monitoring military developments. The duration of the conflict will determine whether the current disruption remains a short-term operational shock or develops into a prolonged restructuring of trade routes serving the Middle East.