Prominent Illinois Arab, Muslim groups reject Biden meeting request over Gaza war

President Joe Biden speaks at an event in Milwaukee on March 13, 2024. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 15 March 2024
Follow

Prominent Illinois Arab, Muslim groups reject Biden meeting request over Gaza war

  • Leaders of 29 Arab and Muslim organizations, several individual activists, sign letter rejecting request
  • ‘Meeting of the minds nowhere in sight,’ says spokesperson of Council on American Islamic Relations

CHICAGO: Arab- and Muslim-American community leaders and elected officials angry over US policies on Gaza rejected a meeting proposed by President Joe Biden that was scheduled for Thursday in Chicago.

The leaders of at least 29 Arab and Muslim organizations, and several individual activists, signed a letter rejecting the request to meet Biden’s aides, saying: “There is no point in more meetings.”Biden has come under intense criticism for supporting Israel’s invasion of Gaza, which has killed more than 31,000 Palestinians.

Recent elections in several swing states with large numbers of Arab and Muslim voters, where Biden narrowly defeated former President Donald Trump, showed significant opposition and made the urgency of the meeting apparent. Illinois voters go to the polls on Tuesday to vote in presidential primary elections.

Community leaders interviewed by Arab News were adamant against meeting with Biden’s aides, citing his vetoes of ceasefire resolutions at the UN Security Council.

“Our stance is clear: Until President Biden and his team advocate for an immediate ceasefire and the unrestricted flow of aid into Gaza, any meeting would merely serve as a photo opportunity,” said Yousif Zegar, spokesman for Orland United for Civic Responsibility.

Orland United activists are protesting what they say are racist and xenophobic comments made by Keith Pekau, mayor of the Chicago suburb of Orland Park.

In response to a ceasefire request signed by more than 800 residents, Pekau told them to “go to another country” if they “want to fight.”

Although Biden met with Arab and Muslim activists in October 2023 to express concerns over mounting civilian casualties in Gaza, he has provided more than $32 billion in funding and weapons to Israel.

And his UN Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield has vetoed three UNSC resolutions calling for humanitarian ceasefires.

Tarek Khalil, a board member of the Chicago chapter of American Muslims for Palestine, said Biden’s actions over the past five months overshadow his expressions of compassion.

“His policy has been dismally disappointing,” Khalil said, adding that Biden “has been complicit” in Israel’s invasion “with 31,000 killed so far and approximately 13,000 being children. Seventy percent of the civilian infrastructure is destroyed. Only 14 of the 36 hospitals in Gaza are partially functional. The remaining aren’t functional at all. Ninety-seven percent of the water is unfit for human consumption.”

He said: “This is all brought about by Israel’s genocide with our tax dollars, the diplomatic policies at the UN and US-made weapons. Biden’s policy has been abysmal.”

Khalil added that the Illinois community is in line with national groups in demanding “an immediate and permanent ceasefire in Gaza, not a temporary one. You can’t grab an axe in one hand and band aids in the other and claim to be doing something good.

“So what’s the point of having a meeting? The discussion period has ended. The bare minimum is a complete and permanent ceasefire.”

Illinois is not a swing state in the presidential election in November. Biden defeated Trump easily in Illinois four years ago, taking 57.5 percent of the state’s vote.

The solidarity of Arabs and Muslims in Illinois to challenge Biden’s reelection reflects the growing influence of the #AbandonBiden coalition.

The group has undermined Biden’s performance in primary elections in several key swing states including Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, Georgia and Washington State.

“The White House already knows the position of the aforementioned groups and our allies across the nation. They know because we’ve made it abundantly clear, including in prior meetings with the White House, but also in press statements, letters to our elected leaders, media interviews, and enormous street action within earshot of the Oval Office,” said Ahmad Rehab, spokesman for the Council on American Islamic Relations in Illinois.

“With a genocide that has flattened Gaza, forcibly displacing 85 percent of its residents and claiming the lives of 31,000 people, 13,000 of whom are children, the White House has not only refused to call for a ceasefire, but also enabled this blatant campaign of ethnic cleansing to take place by providing financial and military means, as well as diplomatic support at the UN. A meeting of the minds is nowhere in sight.”

Illinois State Representative Abdelnasser Rashid, who did not respond to an Arab News request for comment, told Politico recently that he met with Tom Perez, White House director of intergovernmental affairs, in October “and there have been many other meetings … There’s nothing new to be said. We need an immediate and permanent ceasefire. And we need the United States to stop supplying arms to Israel.”

Arab and Muslim leaders who were invited to attend the closed-door meeting said they understood it would include several senior White House aides.

Among those expected were Perez, White House director of public engagement Steve Benjamin, White House liaison to American-Muslim communities Mazen Basrawi, and National Security Council Chief of Staff Curtis Ried. None responded to Arab News requests for comment.

The White House did not issue a statement on the proposed meeting, so it is not known if it took place with some Arab or Muslim leaders from Illinois.

Upon his election, Biden appointed more than 20 Arab Americans to key White House and State Department positions, but all have reportedly been discouraged from making public statements on Arab-Israeli issues.

Arab News requests for comment from Biden’s meeting team and his campaign director for rapid response, Ammar Moussa, went unanswered.


US judge orders curbs on immigration agents’ tactics toward Minnesota protesters

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

US judge orders curbs on immigration agents’ tactics toward Minnesota protesters

  • Arrests and tear-gassing of peaceful demonstrators prohibited
  • Observers also protected from arrests, crowd-control munitions
MINNEAPOLIS: A federal judge in Minnesota on Friday ordered that US immigration agents deployed en masse to Minneapolis be restricted in some of the tactics they have taken against peaceful demonstrators and observers, including arrests and tear-gassing.
Handing a victory to local activists in Minnesota’s most populous city, US District Judge Kate Menendez issued an injunction barring federal agents from retaliating against individuals engaged in non-violent, unobstructive protest activity.
The ruling was in response to a lawsuit filed against the US Department of Homeland Security and other federal agencies on December 17, three weeks before an immigration agent fatally shot Renee Good, a 37-year-old woman in Minneapolis, spawning waves of protests and putting the city on edge.
The court case was brought on behalf of six protesters and observers who claimed their constitutional rights had been infringed by the actions of ICE agents.
The ‌83-page order explicitly ‌prohibits federal officers from detaining people who are peacefully protesting or merely observing the ‌officers, ⁠unless there is ‌reasonable suspicion that they are interfering with law enforcement or have committed a crime.
Federal agents also are banned from using pepper spray, tear gas or other crowd-control munitions against peaceful demonstrators or bystanders observing and recording the immigration enforcement operations, the judge ruled.
Menendez wrote that the government, in defending the street tactics of its immigration officers, had failed to “explain why it is necessary for them to arrest and use force against peaceful observers.”
Stopping or detaining drivers and passengers in vehicles when there is no reason to believe they are forcibly obstructing or interfering with federal agents is likewise prohibited, according to the court ⁠order.
Order comes amid heightened tensions
“There may be ample suspicion to stop cars, and even arrest drivers, engaged in dangerous conduct while following immigration enforcement officers, but ‌that does not justify stops of cars not breaking the law,” Menendez ‍wrote.
The DHS did not immediately respond to a ‍Reuters request for comment.
The ruling comes nearly two weeks after the Trump administration announced it was sending 2,000 immigration ‍agents to the Minneapolis area, bolstering an earlier deployment in what the DHS called its largest such operation in history.
The surge in heavily armed officers from the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency and Border Patrol has since grown to nearly 3,000, dwarfing the ranks of local police officers in the Twin Cities metropolitan area of Minneapolis and St. Paul.
Tensions over the deployment have mounted considerably since an ICE agent fatally shot Good, a mother of three, behind the wheel of her car on January 7.
At the time, Good was taking part in one of numerous neighborhood ⁠patrols organized by local activists to track and monitor ICE activities.
Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, one of the federal officials named in the lawsuit, said after the shooting that Good had been “stalking and impeding” ICE agents all day and had committed an act of “domestic terrorism” by trying to run over federal officers.
Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey and local activists disputed Noem’s account, saying Good posed no physical threat to ICE agents. They pointed to video clips of the incident they said showed that Good was trying to drive her car away from officers and that the use of lethal force against her was unjustified.
Frey and Minnesota Governor Tim Walz have repeatedly demanded that the Trump administration withdraw the immigration agents, asserting that the operation is being conducted in a reckless manner endangering the public.
While largely siding with the plaintiffs in the case, the judge did not grant all their requests, declining to ban the federal government from actions not specifically taken against those who ‌filed suit. She also limited the injunction to officers deployed in the Twin Cities, rather than extending it statewide.