UK Conservative MP apologizes after uproar over ‘no-go zone’ claims

MP Paul Scully made the claims as the Conservatives were engaged in a fresh row over Islamophobia. (File/Bloomberg)
Short Url
Updated 27 February 2024
Follow

UK Conservative MP apologizes after uproar over ‘no-go zone’ claims

  • Paul Scully had said areas of London, Birmingham enforced by Muslims ‘abusing their religion’
  • MP ‘frustrated’ with language he used, says he lost ‘nuance’

LONDON: A Conservative MP in the UK has apologized after claiming that Muslim “no-go” zones exist in major British cities.

Paul Scully, who previously ran to be his party’s candidate for London mayor, made the claims as the Conservatives were engaged in a fresh row over Islamophobia.

In an interview with the BBC, Scully referenced areas of east London and Birmingham as containing “no-go areas” enforced by local Muslims “abusing their religion,” the Daily Telegraph reported on Tuesday.

“If you look at parts of Tower Hamlets, for example, where there are no-go areas, parts of Birmingham Sparkhill, where there are no-go areas, mainly because of doctrine, mainly because of people using, abusing in many ways, their religion to … because it is not the doctrine of Islam, to espouse what some of these people are saying,” he said. “That, I think, is the concern that needs to be addressed.”

Scully was responding to the recent sacking of MP Lee Anderson, who had claimed that Islamists had “got control” of London Mayor Sadiq Khan.

In a subsequent interview for BBC Radio London interview on Tuesday, Scully said he “put his hands up” for using language he “regrets.”

He added that he was “frustrated” with the language he had used in the initial interview, and that he had lost “nuance.”

Scully said: “What I was trying to say, I thought I was being specific about but clearly not, is the fact that a lot of the conversation, and the vacuum that’s allowed to then be filled by populists, is when prejudice builds up because of perception.

“There are areas of this country where there are tiny, tiny groups of people that cause people to feel uncomfortable in particular areas.

“That might be a white gang, that might be a black gang, a Muslim gang, whatever, and that then tends to write off whole communities for some people.”

Scully’s initial claims on “no-go zones” were condemned by Labour and Conservative figures representing the areas he referenced.

Andy Street, the Conservative mayor of the West Midlands, said “those in Westminster” should “stop the nonsense slurs.”

He added: “The idea that Birmingham has a ‘no-go’ zone is news to me, and I suspect the good people of Sparkhill.”

Labour’ Jess Phillips said: “As one of the MPs for Sparkhill, I am expecting an apology for this utter drivel. My kids hang out in Sparkhill day and night, never had a moment’s worry.

“I go there weekly and live literally a five-minute walk from there and used to live there myself.”

Scully also claimed that the Conservative Party did not have a problem with Islamophobia.


Death sentence sought for ex-South Korea leader Yoon over martial law decree

Updated 8 sec ago
Follow

Death sentence sought for ex-South Korea leader Yoon over martial law decree

  • Removed from office last April, Yoon faces criminal trials over his martial law debacle and other scandals
  • The court is expected to deliver a verdict on Yoon in February

SEOUL: An independent counsel has demanded a death sentence for former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol on rebellion charges in connection with his short-lived imposition of martial law in December 2024.
The Seoul Central District Court said independent counsel Cho Eun-suk’s team made the request at a hearing Tuesday. Yoon was expected to make remarks there.
Removed from office last April, Yoon faces criminal trials over his martial law debacle and other scandals related to his time in office. Charges that he directed a rebellion are the most significant ones.
The court is expected to deliver a verdict on Yoon in February.
Yoon has maintained that his decree was a desperate yet peaceful attempt to raise public awareness about what he considered the danger of the liberal opposition Democratic Party, which used its legislative majority to obstruct his agenda and complicate state affairs.
Yoon called the opposition-controlled parliament “a den of criminals” and “anti-state forces.” But lawmakers rushed to object to the imposition of martial law in dramatic overnight scenes, and enough of them, including even those within Yoon’s ruling party, managed to enter an assembly hall to vote down the decree.
Yoon’s decree, the first of its kind in more than 40 years in South Korea, brought armed troops into Seoul streets to encircle the assembly and enter election offices. That evoked traumatic memories of dictatorships in the 1970s and 1980s, when military-backed rulers used martial law and other emergency decrees to station soldiers, tanks and armored vehicles in public places to suppress pro-democracy protests.
Yoon’s decree and ensuing power vacuum plunged South Korea into political turmoil, halted the country’s high-level diplomacy and rattled its financial markets.
Yoon’s earlier vows to fight attempts to impeach and arrest him deepened the country’s political divide. In January last year, he became the country’s first sitting president to be detained.