India’s Gandhi bailed in defamation case over ‘murder’ remarks against home minister

India's opposition Congress party leader Rahul Gandhi waves during his month-long cross-country march, in Lucknow, capital of northern Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, Tuesday, Feb. 20, 2024. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 20 February 2024
Follow

India’s Gandhi bailed in defamation case over ‘murder’ remarks against home minister

  • Critics have accused India’s government of using the justice system to target political rivals
  • Rahul Gandhi faces at least 10 other cases, was briefly disqualified from parliament last year

LUCKNOW: An Indian court Tuesday bailed senior opposition leader Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case brought against him for referring to the home minister as an accused murderer — his latest legal travails ahead of national elections.

Critics have accused India’s government of using the justice system to target political rivals, with several opposition figures the subject of active criminal investigations.

Gandhi, 53, faces at least 10 other defamation cases and was briefly disqualified from parliament last year after being convicted of criminal libel in an unrelated case.

He appeared in court in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh where his bail application was accepted, lawyer Santosh Pandey told reporters outside court.

Tuesday’s case stems from 2018 remarks in which he referred to home minister Amit Shah, a key confidante of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, as a “murder accused.”

Shah was accused of ordering police to carry out the extrajudicial killing of a gangster in 2005 and two others while serving as home minister in Gujarat state.

He was jailed briefly before being acquitted of murder, extortion and kidnapping charges in 2014 after Modi and his Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) won that year’s elections in a landslide.

The case against Gandhi was first lodged in 2018 by a ruling party official and has slowly been snaking its way through India’s glacial criminal justice system since.

Gandhi is the son, grandson and great-grandson of a dynasty of former Indian prime ministers, beginning with independence leader Jawaharlal Nehru.

He is one of the leading faces of an opposition alliance seeking to challenge Modi in this year’s general election, expected to begin in April.

Gandhi has struggled to challenge the electoral juggernaut of Modi and his nationalist appeals to the country’s Hindu majority, losing the past two elections.

He was convicted last year of criminal libel and handed a two-year sentence, which was suspended by a higher court but raised concerns over democratic backsliding in the world’s most populous country.

Last week Gandhi’s Congress party said authorities had frozen its bank accounts after an investigation over its 2018-19 tax returns and issued a payment demand for 2.1 billion rupees ($25.3 million) in relation to its probe.

India’s main financial investigation agency, the Enforcement Directorate, has ongoing investigations into several other leading opposition politicians.


German school students rally against army recruitment drive

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

German school students rally against army recruitment drive

BERLIN: Thousands of German teenagers skipped school Thursday to join protests against a stepped-up military recruitment drive that many fear may in future involve a form of conscription.
About 3,000 students gathered on Berlin’s Potsdamer Platz square, with smaller demonstrations held across Germany as part of a nationwide “school strike.”
“I don’t see why anyone should have to go to the front lines for politicians,” Alex Krzeszka, a 15-year-old student, told AFP at the Berlin rally.
“I don’t see it as morally right, and I think war should never be the solution. Problems should be solved diplomatically.”
Germany, like other European countries, has sought to build up its armed forces in response to Russia’s 2022 full-scale invasion of Ukraine and the threat of further aggression against NATO members.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz has vowed to turn the Bundeswehr into Europe’s largest conventional army, banking initially on a voluntary recruitment drive.
The government this year started requiring all 18-year-old men to fill out questionnaires about their interest and fitness for short-term military service.
Women are also being asked to fill out the forms, but cannot be compelled to do so under current German law.
Among the signs being waved by protesters in Berlin was a poster that read “We are not cannon fodder” while another demanded: “Send Friedrich Merz to the front line!” For now at least, German lawmakers have decided against bringing back mandatory conscription, which Germany suspended in 2011. But some politicians have expressed doubts about whether ambitious recruiting targets can be achieved without some from of conscription.

BACKGROUND

The government this year started requiring all 18-year-old men to fill out questionnaires about their interest and fitness for short-term military service.

Plans call for strengthening the Bundeswehr from about 185,000 active-duty troops now to 260,000 by 2030, while roughly quadrupling the size of the reserves to 200,000.
The Bundeswehr shrank dramatically after the end of the Cold War as countries across Europe slashed defense budgets.
In the 1980s, West Germany alone had fielded a military of nearly 500,000 troops.
“I think they should definitely advertise for the Bundeswehr, but it absolutely shouldn’t be compulsory,” Leander Martinez, a 16-year-old student from Berlin, told AFP.
“Reintroducing conscription is nothing other than rearmament,” Leon Reinemann, a student who helped organize the school strike in the western city of Koblenz, told broadcaster NTV.
He defended the fact students were skipping classes, saying that “a single day of absence from school is significantly less serious than six months in the barracks.”
Others took a more staunchly pacifist stance at the Berlin demonstration.
“I’m against conscription and against war propaganda,” Tillmann, a 19-year-old student who declined to give his last name, told AFP.
“And I think murdering someone is always wrong, even if the state says that someone should be murdered. There’s nothing more important than human life.”