Scottish Labour Party passes motion calling for Gaza ceasefire

Party leader Anas Sarwar has been calling for a ceasefire for several months, in a split with the head of the national party, Keir Starmer. (Reuters/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 17 February 2024
Follow

Scottish Labour Party passes motion calling for Gaza ceasefire

  • National leader Keir Starmer has faced pressure over his stance on issue
  • But Scottish leader Anas Sarwar says parties ‘ultimately have the same position’

LONDON: The Scottish Labour Party has passed a motion calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza, BBC News reported.

Party leader Anas Sarwar has been calling for a ceasefire for several months, in a split with the head of the national party, Keir Starmer, who said he wanted a “sustainable end” to the Israel-Hamas war.

Starmer has faced significant pressure from the party ranks over his stance.

Now, Scottish Labour’s two members of parliament in Westminster — Michael Shanks and Ian Murray — will face pressure to back Sarwar in next week’s vote in the House of Commons calling for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza.

In a similar vote in November, the two MPs abstained.

Starmer has repeatedly shifted his position on the issue, at first calling for a “humanitarian pause” and then a “sustainable ceasefire.”

At the Munich Security Conference, he said that the fighting in Gaza “has to stop,” adding: “The question is how do we get there?”

Scottish Labour’s passing of the ceasefire motion was unopposed. It calls for an end to strikes into and out of Gaza, Hamas’ release of hostages and a pathway to peace.

In his appeal for support for the motion, Neil Bibby, Scottish Labour’s constitution spokesperson, said: “It is simply heartbreaking that countless children in Gaza are currently dying and there are heartbroken parents in Israel too.

“That is why we have a moral obligation to be unequivocal. There must be an end to the fighting now and a sustainable ceasefire. An end to the terror and end to the violence.”

Sarwar has attempted to play down his party’s split with the national Labour Party.

“I don’t think there’s as much distance in this as people now believe,” he said.

“Keir Starmer has said he wants the fighting to stop right now and for that to be a sustainable ceasefire. I think we ultimately have the same position.”


US warns UK to stop arresting Palestine Action supporters

Updated 19 January 2026
Follow

US warns UK to stop arresting Palestine Action supporters

  • Undersecretary of state for diplomacy: Arrests doing ‘more harm than good’ and ‘censoring’ free speech
  • Group was banned in July 2025 after series of break-ins

LONDON: UK authorities should stop arresting protesters showing support for banned group Palestine Action, the White House has warned.

The US undersecretary of state for diplomacy said arrests are doing “more harm than good” and are “censoring” free speech.

Sarah Rogers told news site Semafor: “I would have to look at each individual person and each proscribed organization. I think if you support an organization like Hamas, then depending upon whether you’re coordinating, there are all these standards that get applied.

“This Palestine Action group, I’ve seen it written about. I don’t know what it did. I think if you just merely stand up and say, ‘I support Palestine Action’, then unless you are really coordinating with some violent foreign terrorist, I think that censoring that speech does more harm than good.”

So far, more than 2,000 people have been arrested in the UK for showing support for the group.

It was banned in July 2025 after a series of break-ins nationwide, including at a facility owned by a defense manufacturer and a Royal Air Force base, during which military aircraft were damaged.

Last year, Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg was among those arrested while protesting for Palestine Action.

The group is challenging its ban, saying it should not be compared to terrorist organizations such as the Irish Republican Army, Daesh or Al-Qaeda.

The ban has been criticized by numerous bodies, with Amnesty International calling it a case of “problematic, overly broad and draconian restrictions on free speech.”

In Scotland, prosecutors have been offering to drop charges against some protesters in return for accepting a fine of £100 ($134.30). 

Adam McGibbon, who was arrested at a demonstration in Edinburgh last year, refused the offer, saying: “The fact that the authorities are offering fines equivalent to a parking ticket for a ‘terrorism offence’ shows just how ridiculous these charges are. Do supporters of (Daesh) get the same deal?

“I refuse to pay this fine, as has everyone else I know who has been offered one. Just try and put all 3,000 of us who have defied this ban so far in jail.”

Rogers said the UK is also wrong to arrest people using the phrase “globalize the intifada” while demonstrating in support of Palestine, after police in Manchester said in December that it would detain people chanting it.

“I’m from New York City where thousands of people were murdered by jihadists,” she said. referring to the terror attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. “I don’t want an intifada in New York City, and I think anyone who does is disgusting, but should it be legal to say in most contexts? Yes.”