ISLAMABAD: Former prime minister Imran Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party has called for nationwide demonstrations on Saturday to protest what it calls “brazen rigging” of Feb. 8 national election in the South Asian country.
Khan’s PTI was severely hamstrung ahead of the February 8 polls, with rallies banned, its party symbol taken away, and dozens of its candidates rejected from eligibility to stand.
The party stunned election observers after independent candidates, most loyal to Khan, grabbed the highest 101 seats in the National Assembly, lower house of Pakistan parliament.
However, the party on Friday urged its supporters to protest what it called widespread rigging of the polls.
“Imran Khan’s PTI has called for country wide protests against the unprecedented, massive, brazen rigging in General Elections 2024, where PTI’s win of 180 National Assembly seats & a two-third majority in Parliament, was cut down to half,” the party said on X.
Pakistan’s election commission has denied the accusations and said legal forums were present to address any specific concerns relating to the polls.
Khan, who has been in jail since August last year after he was convicted in a case involving the illegal sale of state gifts, accuses Pakistan’s powerful military of sidelining him and his party from politics. The military denies Khan’s accusations and says it does not interfere in political matters.
A day earlier, Gohar Khan, the current PTI chairman, said his party would present Forms 45 at a press conference in Islamabad on Friday.
Form 45, given to election candidates or their representatives at polling stations, contains details of the breakdown of votes. Since last week’s election, the PTI has been saying that the results in Forms 45 received by its candidates were changed in Forms 47, which are official declaration of constituency results by a returning officer of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).
“We have been repeatedly telling the people and we have shared all those Forms 45 on social media,” Gohar told a private news channel Thursday night.
“Tomorrow, we are organizing a [press conference] at Marriott Hotel [Islamabad] and we will put all Forms 45 in front of media, international media and the people will see how the mandate has been stolen.”
The PTI chairman said they had “exact proofs” of election manipulation.
This is the third time since the election that Khan’s PTI, along with other political parties, have staged protests in various parts of the country over election irregularities, especially over prolonged delays in the release of final results. The party has challenged these results in several constituencies.
Ex-PM Khan party calls for nationwide protests on Saturday against ‘rigging’ of Pakistan polls
https://arab.news/p5ae4
Ex-PM Khan party calls for nationwide protests on Saturday against ‘rigging’ of Pakistan polls
- This is the third time since the Feb. 8 election that Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party has called for protest against poll results
- The PTI was severely hamstrung ahead of polls, with rallies banned, party symbol taken away and candidates rejected from standing
Pakistan rejects claims it approached ICC for dialogue over India match boycott
- Indian journalist Vikrant Gupta says Pakistan approached ICC after it informed PCB of legal ramifications of boycotting India clash
- Pakistan’s government has allowed national team to take part in ongoing World Cup but barred it from playing against India on Feb. 15
ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) this week rejected an Indian journalist’s claim that it has approached the International Cricket Council (ICC) for a dialogue regarding Pakistan’s upcoming cricket fixture against India.
Indian sports journalist Vikrant Gupta wrote on social media platform X on Saturday that the PCB has reached out to the ICC for dialogue over its decision to boycott the Feb. 15 T20 World Cup match against India.
Gupta said the development took place after the ICC informed the PCB of the legal ramifications and potential sanctions the cricket governing body could impose if Pakistan boycotted its World Cup match against India.
Gupta said the ICC was responding to the PCB, which had informed the global cricket governing body in writing that it was pulling out of the match as Pakistan’s government had not allowed the national team to play the Feb. 15 fixture.
“I categorically reject the claim by Indian sports journalist Vikrant Gupta that PCB approached the ICC,” PCB spokesperson Amir Mir said in a statement on Saturday.
“As usual, sections of Indian media are busy circulating fiction. A little patience and time will clearly show who actually went knocking and who didn’t.”
Pakistan’s government earlier this month cleared the team’s participation in the T20 World Cup but barred them from facing India in Colombo on Feb. 15.
Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif later said the decision was taken to express solidarity with Bangladesh, after it was replaced by the ICC in the ongoing tournament.
ICC replaced Bangladesh with Scotland last month after the latter refused to play its World Cup matches in India due to security reasons.
Pakistan has blamed India’s cricket board for influencing the ICC’s decisions. Defense Minister Khawaja Asif this week called for a the formation of a new cricket governing body, saying the ICC is now hostage to “India’s political interests.”
India generates the largest share of cricket’s commercial revenue and hence enjoys considerable influence over the sport. Critics argue that this financial contribution translates into decisive leverage within the ICC.
A large part of that revenue comes from the Indian Premier League (IPL), the sport’s most lucrative T20 cricket competition, which is run by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI). Between 2024 and 2027, the IPL is projected to earn $1.15 billion, nearly 39 percent of the ICC’s total annual revenue, according to international media reports.
The ICC is headed by Jay Shah, the son of Indian Home Minister Amit Shah. The ICC chair is expected to be independent from any cricket board and take impartial decisions.










