WASHINGTON: What would it mean if Russia used nuclear warheads to destroy US satellites? Your home’s electrical and water systems could fail. Aviation, rail and car traffic could come to a halt. Your cellphone could stop working.
These are among the reasons why there was alarm this week over reports that Russia may be pursuing nuclear weapons in space.
The White House has said the danger isn’t imminent. But reports of the new anti-satellite weapon build on longstanding worries about space threats from Russia and China. So much of the country’s infrastructure is now dependent on US satellite communications — and those satellites have become increasingly vulnerable.
It would also not be the first time a nuclear warhead has been detonated in space, or the only capability China and Russia are pursuing to disable or destroy a US satellite.
Here’s a look at what’s happened in the past, why Russia may be pursuing a nuclear weapon for space now, and what the US is doing about all the space threats it faces.
THE PAST: STARFISH PRIME AND PROJECT K
Both Russia and the US have detonated nuclear warheads in space. In the 1960s, little was known about how the relatively new weapons of mass destruction would act in the Earth’s atmosphere. Both countries experimented to find out. The Soviet tests were called Project K and took place from 1961 to 1962. The US conducted 11 tests of its own, and the largest, and first successful, test was known as Starfish Prime, said Stephen Schwartz, a non-resident senior fellow at the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists.
Starfish Prime launched in July 1962, when the US sent up a 1.4-megaton thermonuclear warhead on a Thor missile and detonated it about 250 miles (400 kilometers) above the Earth.
The missile was launched about 800 miles (1,300 kilometers) from Hawaii but the effects from the tests were seen around the equator.
“The large amount of enerqy released at such a high altitude by the detonation caused widespread auroras throughout the Pacific,” according to a 1982 Department of Defense report on the tests.
The blast disabled several satellites, including a British one named Ariel, as radioactive particles from the burst came in contact with them. Radio systems and the electrical grid on Hawaii were temporarily knocked out, said Hans Kristensen, director of the Nuclear Information Project at the Federation of American Scientists. The debris left satellites in its path malfunctioning “along the lines of the old Saturday matinee one-reeler,” the 1982 report said.
When the former Soviet Union conducted its own test as part of Project K, it did so at a slightly lower orbit and “fried systems on the ground, including underground cables and a power plant,” Kristensen said.
The US and the Soviet Union signed a nuclear test ban treaty a year later, in 1963, which prohibited further testing of nuclear weapons in space.
White House national security spokesman John Kirby declined to say Thursday whether the emerging Russian weapon is nuclear capable, noting only that it would violate an international treaty that prohibits the deployment of “nuclear weapons or any other kinds of weapons of mass destruction” in orbit.
SATELLITE ATTACKS TODAY
It’s the ability to do that kind of damage that makes it logical that the Russians would want to put a warhead in space, especially if they see their military and economy weakened after fighting a US-backed Ukraine for the past two years, said John Ferrari, a nonresident senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute.
A space-based weapon that could cripple US communications and the US economy could be an intimidating equalizer, and would just be the latest development from both Russia’s and China’s efforts to weaponize space, he said.
In the past few years China has tested a satellite with a robotic arm that can maneuver to a system, grab it, and move it out of orbit.
Russia has developed a “nesting doll” satellite that opens up to reveal a smaller satellite, and then that one opens to reveal a projectile capable of destroying nearby satellites. In 2019, the Russians maneuvered a nesting doll near a US satellite.
When one of those nesting doll systems “parks next to one of our high-value NRO capabilities, they are now holding that asset at risk,” the deputy chief of space operations of the US Space Force, Lt. Gen. DeAnna Burt, said at a 2022 space conference. NRO is the National Reconnaissance Office.
Russia also generated headlines around the world when it conducted a more traditional anti-satellite test in 2021, where it shot down one of its own systems. As with the Starfish test, the impact created a large cloud of orbiting debris that even put the International Space Station at risk for awhile.
THE NEW SPACE FORCE
The quickly evolving threat in space was one of the main drivers behind establishing the US Space Force, Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said at a briefing Thursday. In the years since its 2019 creation, the service has focused on developing a curriculum to train its service members, called Guardians, on detecting threats from space and wargaming scenarios on what conflict in space would look like.
The creation of the Space Force elevated spending on satellite systems and defenses. Previously, when space needs were spread among the military services, spending on a new satellite would have to compete for funding with ships or fighter jets — and the services had a more immediate need for the aircraft and vessels, Ferrari said.
But there’s more work to be done, and the revelation that Russia may be pursuing a nuclear weapon for space raises critical questions for Congress and the Defense Department, Ferrari said. If Russia uses a nuclear weapon to take out satellites and that cripples the US economy, does that justify the US bombing Russian cities in return?
“How do you respond to that? You have no good option,” Ferrari said. “So now it’s a question of, ‘What is the deterrence theory for this?’ ”
Before Russia’s satellite threat, there were Starfish Prime, nesting dolls and robotic arms
https://arab.news/jgfgu
Before Russia’s satellite threat, there were Starfish Prime, nesting dolls and robotic arms
‘I was motivated by solving problems the world didn’t care about,’ first Saudi Nobel laureate Omar M. Yaghi tells Arab News
- Yaghi became the first Saudi national to win a Nobel Prize, sharing the 2025 Chemistry award for work on metal-organic frameworks
- Prior to gaining US and Saudi citizenship, he grew up in a Palestinian refugee camp, where water scarcity and hardship shaped his early life
STOCKHOLM: Saudi-American scientist Omar M. Yaghi’s career has been shaped by a rare combination of intellectual audacity and personal history — a lifelong drive to push science beyond known limits, while never losing sight of its capacity to serve humanity.
In 2025, that journey culminated in global recognition when Yaghi became the first Saudi national to receive a Nobel Prize, and only the second Arab-born laureate to be awarded the chemistry prize, after the Egyptian-American scientist Ahmed Zewail in 1999.
Yaghi shared the Nobel Prize in Chemistry with British-Australian scientist Richard Robson and Japanese scientist Susumu Kitagawa.
Together, the three were recognized for more than half a century of contributions to the development of metal-organic frameworks, or MOFs — porous, sponge-like materials with vast internal spaces capable of storing carbon dioxide or harvesting water from the air.
They will also share the 11 million Swedish krona (about $1 million) prize.
Once a niche academic pursuit, MOF science is now studied in more than 100 countries and applied at industrial scale, with uses ranging from climate change mitigation to addressing water scarcity.
Yaghi’s rise to the pinnacle of global science began far from elite laboratories. He grew up in a Palestinian refugee family of 10 children, living on the outskirts of the Al-Wehdat refugee camp in the Jordanian capital, Amman.
The family’s single-room home had no electricity. Water arrived only once a week — sometimes once every two weeks — prompting residents to rush to fill every available bucket before the next long wait.
“It’s not the poetic idea that because I had hardship with water when I was a child that I was determined to solve the problem,” Yaghi told Arab News.
“I was much more motivated by solving problems that the world didn’t really care about. That’s basic science, which is about going to the frontiers of knowledge and being brave enough to solve problems.
“Once you make that great discovery, then it leads to much more benefit than you would have achieved had you done it by initially answering the problems of society,” he said.
His childhood revolved around three defining spaces: the family home near Al-Wehdat, where livestock were raised; the butcher shop his father, Mounes, ran on King Talal Street; and the private Bishop’s School in the historic Jabal Amman district.
The Yaghi family originally came from Al-Masmiyya, a Palestinian village between Jerusalem and Jaffa that was depopulated and destroyed after being occupied by the Zionist paramilitary group Haganah in 1948.
In 2018, Yaghi made a homage visit to Al-Masmiyya, searching for specific locations preserved in family stories of life before the Nakba.
After displacement, the family settled in Amman, where Omar was born in 1965 and where his father built a cattle and butchery business that left a lasting impression on his son.
“This shop figured prominently in my life. There, I learned the power of a work ethic. I learned that when you have a transaction with other people, you should be honest, the power of honesty and of hard work,” he said.
Yaghi watched his parents work relentlessly to support their children’s education. His father rose before dawn and worked until after sunset, while his mother baked fresh bread, prepared meals, cared for the household, and tended the cows.
“I was shy and quiet. And had done my homework separately from the other kids, and didn’t play the games that they were playing, and it seems like I spent most of my childhood sitting in a corner, reading or writing, and observing what was happening around me,” he said.
Although the family was registered as refugees with the UN Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East, his father opted against enrolling his children in UNRWA schools.
“We didn’t go to UNRWA schools because my father felt that he needed reporting on our performance in school on a regular basis,” Yaghi said. UNRWA provided reports only once a term — too infrequent for his father’s liking.
At Bishop’s School, Yaghi studied English and some French alongside mathematics and science, subjects the school emphasized strongly. “Math and science were topics that my father absolutely wanted to see us do very well at,” he said.
At the age of 10, a chance encounter with molecular drawings in the school library proved transformative. He was captivated by their beauty and mystery, later learning that these shapes formed the basic building blocks of all matter, living and non-living alike.
In 1980, aged just 15, Yaghi travelled alone to the US, enrolling at Hudson Valley Community College in Troy, New York, where he studied English, science, and mathematics.
The family’s savings — nearly $9,000 — sustained him for about two years. To survive, he worked odd jobs in supermarkets and tutored fellow students in math.
Although he could read and write English, he soon realized he was unprepared for the speed and idiom of American speech.
He immersed himself in the language, watching news broadcasts and soap operas, speaking with classmates, reading at least one full newspaper story every day, and consulting a dictionary he had brought from Amman.
“Most words that were in the newspaper were not in this dictionary, but I managed to get at least a few new words,” he said. Within three to six months, he had mastered American English.
In 1985, he earned a bachelor’s degree in chemistry from the State University of New York at Albany. Five years later, he completed his PhD at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
After academic appointments at Arizona State University, the University of Michigan, and UCLA, Yaghi joined UC Berkeley in 2012, where he holds the James and Neeltje Tretter Chair.
He is also the founding director of the Berkeley Global Science Institute and has taught students from 15 countries, including Saudi Arabia, the UAE, China, and the UK.
In 1995, Yaghi coined the term “metal-organic framework” to describe crystalline structures capable of hosting guest molecules within their internal cavities while withstanding temperatures exceeding 300 degrees centigrade.
Four years later, he introduced MOF-5, now considered a classic in the field for its extraordinary internal surface area. By 2003, he had demonstrated that MOFs could be rationally modified — a breakthrough that unlocked their practical versatility.
James Stephenson, CEO of Promethean Particles, said MOFs are prized for their ability to capture carbon dioxide and harvest water, and for the precision with which they can be engineered for specific gases.
A single gram of MOF has a surface area of about 8,000 square meters, measured using the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller method. Stephenson often likens their structure to cages.
“If you think about a cage structure, and at every corner, there is a metal ion, and then the pieces that connect those are linkers. You can have almost limitless combinations of metals and linkers, and by changing them, you can create these cages in different sizes,” he said.
Promethean Particles has led industrial-scale MOF production since 2012 and, in 2022, pioneered their use for carbon capture at Drax, the UK’s largest power plant in North Yorkshire.
“MOFs are known for all this complexity, but really, it’s about the space inside them,” Stephenson said. “It’s about the holes that make them so different. Our approach is to make MOFs at large volumes, as cost-effectively as possible, with safe, abundant raw materials.”
The company already supplies a UK customer operating a MOF-based water harvesting machine. Stephenson says MOFs offer advantages over desalination plants, which are energy-intensive, immobile, and ill-suited to remote areas.
“Dewpoint machines have limitations today with regard to the conditions in which they can extract water from the atmosphere. So the potential for MOFs as a water harvest will allow us to provide access to water to more people,” he added.
According to the World Health Organization, 2.1 billion people worldwide lack access to safely managed drinking water, including 106 million relying on untreated surface sources.
Since 2018, Yaghi has increasingly pursued entrepreneurial ventures, founding Atoco to work on water harvesting and CO2 capture, and co-founding H2MOF for hydrogen storage and WaHa Inc. for water harvesting projects in the Middle East.
He said current energy-efficient MOF prototypes can produce 100 liters of water per day, with the potential to reach 2,000 liters.
“I’m very hopeful that this becomes a major contributor to the supply of water, not just in the arid regions, but also in regions of the world where there may be a lot of water, but it’s not clean,” Yaghi said.
His achievements have brought international recognition. He received the King Faisal International Prize for Chemistry in 2015, and in 2021 King Salman granted him Saudi citizenship for his contributions to reticular chemistry and nanomaterials.
He is also co-director of the KACST-UC Berkeley Center of Excellence for Nanomaterials for Clean Energy Applications and advises the KACST president.
“The Saudis have treated me very well, and they were very kind to confer Saudi citizenship on me. I collaborate with them. As a scientist, my only concern is solving a problem that serves humanity,” he said.
“I am very proud of my Palestinian origin. I was born and raised in Jordan. I became an American citizen. Americans have treated me very well,” he added.
Yaghi has donated a model of MOF-5 to the Nobel Prize Museum, where it will be displayed alongside Zewail’s “femtochemistry apparatus.”
That instrument illustrates Zewail’s technique of capturing chemical reactions within a femtosecond — a span to a second what a second is to 32 million years.
The donation puts Yaghi among hundreds of laureates who have contributed artifacts since the museum’s founding in 2001, marking the centenary of the Nobel Prize, established in 1901.
“I think first and foremost, a scientist is about answering questions that advance the state of knowledge,” Yaghi said.
“I like basic research very much because it allows you to be free in pursuing an intellectual challenge. When you solve an intellectual challenge, you end up providing a base for many benefits to society.”
Related
