Moody’s flags credit risks in Pakistan amid post-election political uncertainty

A sign for Moody's rating agency is displayed at the company headquarters in New York, US, on September 18, 2012. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 14 February 2024
Follow

Moody’s flags credit risks in Pakistan amid post-election political uncertainty

  • US-based firm fears a coalition administration may not be strong enough to take tough economic decisions
  • It says Pakistan’s liquidity and external vulnerability risks remain high, need clarity on credible financing plan

KARACHI: A leading global credit rating agency on Wednesday expressed concern over continuing political uncertainty in Pakistan after the February 8 general elections produced inconclusive results, calling the current situation a credit negative for the country.

Pakistan faces significant macroeconomic challenges, particularly due to its weak external and liquidity situation.

According to independent financial analysts, the country’s new government will need to start tackling daunting economic problems from the first day in office since it will have to negotiate a new International Monetary Fund (IMF) program and take a range of policy measures to rejuvenate the national economy.

Moody’s, an American financial services company, that rates the creditworthiness of borrowers, ranging from private enterprises to governments, said prolonged delays in government formation may further compound Pakistan’s problems.

“Even if a combination of parties successfully form a multiparty coalition government, the coalition may not be very united and politically strong,” it said in a statement. “The new government will face challenges in securing consensus to pursue difficult but necessary reforms, including revenue raising measures, to improve Pakistan’s macroeconomic conditions.”

“Moreover, there is also uncertainty around the extent of public protests because they may challenge the legitimacy of the new government,” it added. “Social tensions may increase, which would likely constrain the government’s ability to undertake reforms.”

According to official data released earlier this month, Pakistan’s foreign-exchange reserves remain low at $8 billion and are only sufficient to cover about six weeks of imports.

Based on the IMF report published in January, the country’s external financing needs are about $22 billion in fiscal 2025 and about $25 billion annually in fiscal 2026 and 2027.

Under the circumstances, the country needs a longer-term financing plan to meet its needs for the next few years, after its current IMF program ends in April 2024.

“Overall, uncertainty around Pakistan’s ability to quickly negotiate a new IMF program after the current one expires in April 2024 remains very high,” Moody’s informed. “Pakistan’s government liquidity and external vulnerability risks will remain very high until there is clarity on a credible longer-term financing plan.”


Sindh assembly passes resolution rejecting move to separate Karachi

Updated 21 February 2026
Follow

Sindh assembly passes resolution rejecting move to separate Karachi

  • Chief Minister Shah cites constitutional safeguards against altering provincial boundaries
  • Calls to separate Karachi intensified amid governance concerns after a mall fire last month

ISLAMABAD: The provincial assembly of Pakistan’s southern Sindh province on Saturday passed a resolution rejecting any move to separate Karachi, declaring its territorial integrity “non-negotiable” amid political calls to carve the city out as a separate administrative unit.

The resolution comes after fresh demands by the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) and other voices to grant Karachi provincial or federal status following governance challenges highlighted by the deadly Gul Plaza fire earlier this year that killed 80 people.

Karachi, Pakistan’s largest and most densely populated city, is the country’s main commercial hub and contributes a significant share to the national economy.

Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah tabled the resolution in the assembly, condemning what he described as “divisive statements” about breaking up Sindh or detaching Karachi.

“The province that played a foundational role in the creation of Pakistan cannot allow the fragmentation of its own historic homeland,” Shah told lawmakers, adding that any attempt to divide Sindh or separate Karachi was contrary to the constitution and democratic norms.

Citing Article 239 of Pakistan’s 1973 Constitution, which requires the consent of not less than two-thirds of a provincial assembly to alter provincial boundaries, Shah said any such move could not proceed without the assembly’s approval.

“If any such move is attempted, it is this Assembly — by a two-thirds majority — that will decide,” he said.

The resolution reaffirmed that Karachi would “forever remain” an integral part of Sindh and directed the provincial government to forward the motion to the president, prime minister and parliamentary leadership for record.

Shah said the resolution was not aimed at anyone but referred to the shifting stance of MQM in the debate while warning that opposing the resolution would amount to supporting the division of Sindh.

The party has been a major political force in Karachi with a significant vote bank in the city and has frequently criticized Shah’s provincial administration over its governance of Pakistan’s largest metropolis.

Taha Ahmed Khan, a senior MQM leader, acknowledged that his party had “presented its demand openly on television channels with clear and logical arguments” to separate Karachi from Sindh.

“It is a purely constitutional debate,” he told Arab News by phone. “We are aware that the Pakistan Peoples Party, which rules the province, holds a two-thirds majority and that a new province cannot be created at this stage. But that does not mean new provinces can never be formed.”

Calls to alter Karachi’s status have periodically surfaced amid longstanding complaints over governance, infrastructure and administrative control in the megacity, though no formal proposal to redraw provincial boundaries has been introduced at the federal level.