UK’s Cameron urges Israel to take more ‘surgical’ approach to Hamas

British Foreign Minister David Cameron delivers his speech in Rome, on Dec. 19, 2023. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 22 December 2023
Follow

UK’s Cameron urges Israel to take more ‘surgical’ approach to Hamas

  • Cameron said Britain was asking Israel to "recognise that they have to minimise civilian casualties, they have to obey international humanitarian law at all times"
  • "We want to see a much more surgical, clinical and targeted approach when it comes to dealing with Hamas"

ROME: British Foreign Secretary David Cameron on Tuesday urged Israel to take a “much more surgical, clinical and targeted approach” in dealing with Hamas.

After talks with his Italian counterpart in Rome, Cameron said Britain was asking Israel to “recognize that they have to minimize civilian casualties, they have to obey international humanitarian law at all times”.

He noted that, according to the Israelis, there had been fewer civilian casualties in the south of Gaza than in the north.

“I would urge them still to go further,” the former premier told reporters.

“We want to see a much more surgical, clinical and targeted approach when it comes to dealing with Hamas.”

Cameron and his German counterpart Annalena Baerbock wrote a joint article on Sunday calling for a “sustainable ceasefire” in Gaza, and said that “too many civilians have been killed” in the conflict.

Asked what a sustainable ceasefire meant, he said Tuesday that stopping the fighting was “not sustainable if you stop permanently and Hamas are left in control of even one part of Gaza”.

He said a ceasefire and a two-state solution “cannot go together”.

“You cannot expect the Israelis to have a two-state solution with Hamas in control of one part of what would be Palestine,” Cameron said.

“A sustainable solution means that Hamas are no longer a threat to Israel, they are not capable of doing what they did on October 7.”

Hamas launched an unprecedented attack on Israel on October 7, bursting through the militarized Gaza border fence, killing around 1,140 people in Israel, mostly civilians, and abducting about 250, according to the latest Israeli figures.

Gaza’s Hamas-run health ministry says Israel’s withering military response has killed more than 19,667 people, mostly women and children, while devastating large swathes of the coastal territory.


Editorial: The threat of Yemen’s fragmentation is far reaching

President of Yemen’s Presidential Leadership Council Rashad Mohammed Al-Alimi. (SABA Net)
Updated 25 December 2025
Follow

Editorial: The threat of Yemen’s fragmentation is far reaching

  • The southern issue is a just cause — one that must be addressed in any future political settlement and not reduced to the ambitions of any single individual, including the likes of Aidarous Al-Zubaidi

RIYADH: As Yemen’s political landscape continues to shift at a dizzying pace, it is worth pausing to reflect on the official Saudi position — and the commentary of some of our leading Saudi columnists — regarding the recent unilateral moves by the Southern Transitional Council (STC) in the governorates of Hadramout and Al-Mahrah. These actions, taken without the consent of the Presidential Leadership Council (PLC) or coordination with the Arab Coalition, represent a dangerous gamble with the future of a fragile nation — one that Saudi Arabia, like its Arab neighbors, wishes only peace, stability, and prosperity.
There is no ambiguity in the Kingdom’s stance: it has worked tirelessly to preserve calm in Hadramout and Al-Mahrah, steering both regions away from military escalation and toward peaceful solutions. In a bid to contain the situation, Saudi Arabia, in coordination with its brothers and partners in the United Arab Emirates and the PLC, dispatched a joint team to negotiate with the STC. The goal was clear — facilitate the withdrawal of STC forces and hand over military sites to the National Shield Forces.
Yet despite Riyadh’s call for de-escalation and its appeal to the STC to prioritize national interest and social cohesion, the Council has persisted in its confrontational posture, seemingly indifferent to the grave consequences of its actions.
Observers in Riyadh will note that the Kingdom remains steadfast in its support for the PLC and Yemen’s internationally recognized government. Its commitment to Yemen’s stability is not rhetorical — it is political, economic, and developmental. Saudi Arabia’s vision is to shepherd Yemen from the shadows of conflict into an era of peace, prosperity, and regional integration. This is not merely a function of geography or shared borders; it is a reflection of the Kingdom’s religious, political, and economic responsibilities in the Arab and Islamic world.
From this vantage point, the newspaper firmly believes that the STC’s unilateral actions in Hadramout constitute a blatant violation of Yemen’s transitional framework. They undermine the legitimacy of the recognized government, threaten the fragile peace, and jeopardize the political process. Worse still, they echo the very tactics employed by the Houthi militias — an alarming parallel that should not be ignored.
It is therefore essential to reiterate the Kingdom’s position: the STC must withdraw its forces from Hadramout and Al-Mahrah, restoring the status quo ante. This is not a punitive demand, but a necessary step to safeguard national security and prevent further military flare-ups.
At the same time, Saudi Arabia has consistently affirmed that the southern issue is a just cause — one that must be addressed in any future political settlement. It is enshrined in the outcomes of Yemen’s National Dialogue and must be resolved inclusively, reflecting the aspirations of all southern Yemenis — not reduced to the ambitions of any single individual, including the likes of Aidarous Al-Zubaidi or other STC figures.
Ultimately, we urge the separatists to choose reason over recklessness. Partitioning Yemen will not bring peace — it will sow the seeds of future wars, embolden extremist actors, and pose a threat not only to Yemen’s internal cohesion but to regional and international stability. As Western and American policymakers know all too well: what happens in Yemen never stays in Yemen.