Bollywood star or deepfake? AI floods social media in Asia 

Bollywood actress Rashmika Mandanna poses for a photograph during the promotion of her film 'Animal' in Mumbai on November 30, 2023. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 14 December 2023
Follow

Bollywood star or deepfake? AI floods social media in Asia 

  • Among those targeted with deepfakes are Bollywood actors like Katrina Kaif, Alia Bhatt and Deepika Padukone 
  • 18-year-old Pakistani woman allegedly shot dead by family last month after doctored photo of her with a man went viral

There was the Bollywood star in skin-tight lycra, the Bangladeshi politician filmed in a bikini and the young Pakistani woman snapped with a man. 

None was real, but all three images were credible enough to unleash lust, vitriol — and even allegedly a murder, underlining the sophistication of generative artificial intelligence, and the threats it poses to women across Asia. 

The two videos and the photo were deepfake, and went viral in a vibrant social mediascape that is struggling to come to grips with the technology that has the power to create convincing copies that can upend real lives. 

“We need to address this as a community and with urgency before more of us are affected by such identity theft,” Indian actor Rashmika Mandanna said in a post on X, formerly Twitter, that has garnered more than 6.2 million views. 

She is not the only Bollywood star to be cloned and attacked on social media, with top actors including Katrina Kaif, Alia Bhatt and Deepika Padukone also targeted with deepfakes. 

The lycra video, said Mandanna, was “extremely scary not only for me, but also for each one of us who today is vulnerable to so much harm because of how technology is being misused.” 

While digitally manipulated images and videos of women were once easy to spot, usually lurking in the dark corners of the Internet, the explosion in generative AI tools such as Midjourney, Stable Diffusion and DALL-E has made it easy and cheap to create and circulate convincing deepfakes. 

More than 90 percent of deepfake videos online are pornographic, according to tech experts, and most are of women. 

While there are no separate data for South Asian countries, digital rights experts say the issue is particularly challenging in conservative societies, where women have long been harassed online and abuse has gone largely unpunished. 

Social media firms are struggling to keep up. 

Google’s YouTube and Meta Platforms — which owns Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp — have updated their policies, requiring creators and advertisers to label all AI-generated content. 

But the onus is largely on victims — usually girls and women — to take action, said Rumman Chowdhury, an AI expert at Harvard University who previously worked at reducing harms on Twitter. 

“Generative AI will regrettably supercharge online harassment and malicious content ... and women are the canaries in the coal mine. They are the ones impacted first, the ones on whom the technologies are tested,” she said. 

“It is an indication to the rest of the world to pay attention, because it’s coming for everyone,” Chowdhury told a recent United Nations briefing. 

DEEPFAKES AND THE LAW 

As deepfakes have proliferated worldwide, there are growing concerns — and rising instances — of their use in harassment, scams and sextortion. 

Regulations have been slow to follow. 

The US Executive Order on AI touches on dangers posed by deepfakes, while the European Union’s proposed AI Act will require greater transparency and disclosure from providers. 

Last month, 18 countries — including the United States and Britain — unveiled a non-binding agreement on keeping the wider public safe from AI misuse, including deepfakes. 

Among Asian nations, China requires providers to use watermarks and report illegal deepfakes, while South Korea has made it illegal to distribute deepfakes that harm “public interest,” with potential imprisonment or fines. 

India is taking a tough stance as it drafts new rules. 

IT Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw has said social media firms must remove deepfakes within 36 hours of receiving a notification, or risk losing their safe-harbor status that protects them from liability for third-party content. 

But the focus should be on “mitigating and preventing incidents, rather than reactive responses,” said Malavika Rajkumar at the advocacy group IT for Change. 

While the Indian government has indicated it may force providers and platforms to disclose the identity of deepfake creators, “striking a balance between privacy protection and preventing abuse is key,” Rajkumar added. 

WOMEN TARGETED 

Deepfakes of women and other vulnerable communities such as LGBTQ+ people — especially sexual images and videos — can be particularly dangerous in deeply religious or conservative societies, human rights activists say. 

In Bangladesh, deepfake videos of female opposition politicians — Rumin Farhana in a bikini and Nipun Roy in a swimming pool — have emerged ahead of an election on Jan. 7. 

And last month, an 18-year-old woman was allegedly shot dead by her father and uncle in a so-called honor killing in Pakistan’s remote Kohistan province, after a photograph of her with a man went viral. Police say the image was doctored. 

Shahzadi Rai, a transgender member of Pakistan’s Karachi Municipal Council, who has been the target of abusive trolling with deepfake images, has said they could exacerbate online gender-based violence and “seriously jeopardize” her career. 

Even if audiences are able to distinguish between a real image and a deepfake, the woman’s integrity is questioned, and her credibility may be damaged, said Nighat Dad, founder of the non-profit Digital Rights Foundation in Pakistan. 

“The threat to women’s privacy and safety is deeply concerning,” she said, particularly as disinformation campaigns gain steam ahead of an election scheduled for Feb. 8. 

“Deepfakes are creating an increasingly unsafe online environment for women, even non-public figures, and may discourage women from participating in politics and online spaces,” she said. 

In several countries including India, entrenched gender biases already affect the ability of girls and young women to use the Internet, a recent report found. 

Deepfakes of powerful Bollywood stars only underline the risk that AI poses to all women, said Rajkumar. 

“Deepfakes have affected women and vulnerable communities for a long time; they have gained widespread attention only after popular actresses were targeted,” she said. 

The heightened focus now should push “platforms, policymakers, and society at large to create a safer and more inclusive online environment,” she added. 


CIA tracked Iranian leaders for months ahead of attacks that began with 3 strikes in 60 seconds

Updated 8 sec ago
Follow

CIA tracked Iranian leaders for months ahead of attacks that began with 3 strikes in 60 seconds

WASHINGTON: Israeli and American authorities spent weeks tracking the movements of senior Iranian leaders, including Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, sharing information that allowed the strikes to be carried out in a surprise daylight attack, according to an Israeli military official and a person familiar with the operation.
The eventual barrage of US-Israeli attacks on Iran came so quickly that they were nearly simultaneous — with three strikes in three locations hitting within a single minute — killing Khamenei and some 40 senior figures, including the head of the Revolutionary Guard and the country’s defense minister, the Israeli military official said Sunday.
The official insisted on anonymity to more fully detail the attack, but said that a variety of factors created a golden opportunity to take out much of Iran’s leadership, like weeks of training and monitoring the movements of senior figures as well as intelligence in real-time before the attack began that key targets were gathered together.
Striking by day also gave an additional element of surprise, said the official, who said that so many major, rapid-fire strikes were critical to keep key officials from fleeing after the first strike. The official said Israel closely cooperated with its US counterparts and had used a similar tactic at the beginning of last June’s war — which resulted in the killing of several senior Iranian figures.
The official also noted Khamenei having posted defiant tweets taunting President Donald Trump in the days before the attack.
The details about the strikes came as the conflict entered its second day, with Trump saying in a video message Sunday that he expected it would continue until “all of our objectives are achieved.” He did not spell out what those objectives were.
The Republican president also said the US military and its partners hit hundreds of targets in Iran, including paramilitary Revolutionary Guard facilities, Iranian air defense systems and nine warships, “all in a matter of literally minutes.”
CIA had long tracked top Iranian leaders
Before the attacks, the CIA had for months tracked the movements of senior Iranian leaders, including the country’s supreme leader.
The intelligence was shared with Israeli officials, and the timing of the strikes was adjusted in part because of that information about the Iranian leaders’ location, according to the person, who was not authorized to comment publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
The intelligence-sharing between US and Israel reflects the preparation that went into the strikes, which continued for a second day Sunday after Khamenei’s killing threw the future of the Islamic Republic into uncertainty and raised the risk of escalating regional conflict.
Arkansas Republican Sen. Tom Cotton, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told CBS’ “Face the Nation” that tracking the movements of the supreme leader and the heads of other adversarial nations “is obviously one of the highest priorities of our intelligence community.”
The US regularly shares intelligence with allies including Israel. Those partnerships, and the accuracy of the intelligence they yield, is often critical not only to the success of a military operation but also to the public’s support for it.
Virginia Sen. Mark Warner, the senior Democrat on the committee, told The Associated Press that, historically, “our working relationship with the Mossad and Israel is really strong.” Mossad is the Israeli spy agency.
Warner said he has serious concerns about the justification for the strikes, Trump’s long-term plans for the conflict and the risks that US service members will face. The military announced that three American troops had been killed in the Iran operation.
“No tears will be shed over their leadership being eliminated, but always the question is: OK, what next?” Warner said.
Iran has signaled it’s open to talks with the US
A senior White House official said Iran’s “new potential leadership” has suggested it is open to talks with the United States. That official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss internal administration deliberations, said Trump has indicated he’s “eventually” willing to talk but that for now the military operation “continues unabated.”
The official did not say who the potential new Iranian leaders are or how they made their alleged willingness to talk known. Separately, Trump told The Atlantic that he planned to speak with Iran’s new leadership.
“They want to talk, and I have agreed to talk, so I will be talking to them,” he said Sunday, declining comment on the timing.
The potential future diplomatic opening comes as the details were emerging about the detailed planning that went into the US-Israeli strikes and some of the targets that were hit in Iran.
US Central Command said that B-2 stealth bombers struck Iran’s ballistic missile facilities with 2,000-pound bombs. That mirrors the approach that the military took in June, when Trump agreed to deploy B-2 bombers to attack three key Iranian nuclear sites.
Trump said during his State of the Union speech last week that Iran had been building ballistic missiles that could reach the US homeland — a justification he repeated again Saturday as he announced that the bombardment of Iran was underway.
Iran has not acknowledged that it is building or seeking to build intercontinental ballistic missiles. The US Defense Intelligence Agency, however, said in an unclassified report last year that Iran could develop a militarily viable intercontinental ballistic missile by 2035 “should Tehran decide to pursue the capability.”