Pakistan top court orders government to ensure general elections on Feb 8

In this file photo, taken on May 11, 2023, Paramilitary soldiers stand guard outside the Supreme Court of Pakistan in Islamabad. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 03 November 2023
Follow

Pakistan top court orders government to ensure general elections on Feb 8

  • General elections were due in November but delayed due to fresh demarcation of constituencies
  • On Thursday, chief justice instructed election regulator to consult on election date with president

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Friday ordered the government to ensure the conduct of general elections in Pakistan on February 8, a day after President Arif Alvi and Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Sikandar Sultan Raja unanimously agreed on the said date.

The verdict came after a lawyer for the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) informed the Supreme Court on Thursday that polls in the country would be held on February 11. 

But Chief Justice Qazi Faez Isa instructed the ECP to appear before the court on Friday, after consulting on the date with President Dr. Arif Alvi, as is mandated by the constitution. ECP officials then met with the president and announced that elections would be held on Feb 8.

On Friday, a three-member bench, led by Chief Justice Isa, resumed hearing multiple petitions seeking a final date for elections and asked all stake-holders if they had any objection to the election date. Everyone replied in the negative.

“After all the requirements are fulfilled, the Election Commission should announce the election schedule,” the chief justice said. “Elections will definitely be held on February 8, God willing.”

Elections in the politically and economically troubled South Asian nation had to be held in November but were delayed due to fresh demarcation of constituencies under a new census. In September, the ECP said it needed until at least January to hold polls.

Recently, amendments to Sections 57 and 58 of the Election Act 2017 allowed the ECP to bypass the president and unilaterally announce election dates. However, independent legal analysts believed the power of the president to set a date for elections under Article 48(5) was an independent power under the Constitution and not subservient to any other provision of the Constitution.

During Friday’s hearing, held in two phases, the chief justice asked the Attorney-General of Pakistan Mansoor Usman Awan to get President Alvi’s signature on the minutes of the meeting held with the chief election commissioner as the minutes he had filed earlier did not bear the signature.

Awan, following an adjournment of the hearing, submitted the signed meeting minutes in the court.

In its verdict, the top court mentioned that a notification of the general election date had also been issued by the ECP and that no party had any objection to holding elections on Feb 8.

Pakistan is currently being run by a caretaker government under interim Prime Minister Anwaar-ul-Haq Kakar that is meant to oversee a general election.

Despite the delay, the announcement of polls is likely to ease political uncertainty as the country struggles to stay on a narrow stabilization path under a $3 billion bailout plan by the International Monetary Fund (IMF).


Pakistan, 21 other countries condemn Israeli West Bank measures, warn of ‘de facto annexation’

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan, 21 other countries condemn Israeli West Bank measures, warn of ‘de facto annexation’

  • Joint statement says settlement expansion violates international law, cites UN resolutions, ICJ advisory opinion
  • Signatories include European and Latin American nations such as France and Brazil , alongside Muslim countries

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and 21 other countries, including France, Brazil, Spain and Denmark, on Tuesday condemned sweeping Israeli measures to expand control over the occupied West Bank, warning the steps risk advancing “unacceptable de facto annexation” and undermining prospects for a two-state solution.

In a joint statement issued by the foreign ministers of countries from the Middle East, Europe and Latin America, as well as the secretaries general of the League of Arab States and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, the signatories urged Israel to immediately reverse recent decisions reclassifying Palestinian land and accelerating settlement activity.

The statement marks a broadening of international criticism beyond Muslim-majority states that have long denounced Israeli settlement expansion, bringing together countries like Norway, Sweden, Portugal, Finland, Iceland, Ireland and Luxembourg alongside Arab and other Muslim-majority nations.

“Israel’s illegal settlements, and decisions designed to further them, are a flagrant violation of international law, including previous United Nations Security Council Resolutions and the 2024 Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice,” the ministers said.

They added the measures were “part of a clear trajectory that aims to change the reality on the ground and to advance unacceptable de facto annexation,” warning that they undermine ongoing efforts for regional peace and stability, including a proposed 20-Point Plan for Gaza, and threaten prospects for broader regional integration.

The ministers called on Israel “to reverse them immediately, to respect its international obligations, and to refrain from actions that would result in permanent changes to the legal and administrative status of the occupied Palestinian Territory.”

The latest statement follows mounting concern over Israel’s land and settlement policies in the West Bank.

Last week, Pakistan and seven other Muslim nations condemned Israel’s decision to approve land registration procedures in parts of the West Bank for the first time since 1967, a move widely seen as easing the path for settlement expansion and potential annexation.

Members of the Israeli cabinet have backed measures to tighten administrative control over areas of the West Bank, including Area C, which makes up around 60 percent of the territory and remains under full Israeli security and administrative control under the Oslo accords.

More than 500,000 Israeli settlers live in settlements and outposts in the West Bank, excluding Israeli-annexed East Jerusalem, alongside around three million Palestinians.

Settlements are considered illegal under international law, a position Israel disputes.

In the latest statement, the foreign ministers reiterated their rejection of “all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem,” and said they oppose “any form of annexation.”

“In view of the alarming escalation in the West Bank, we also call on Israel to put an end to settler violence against Palestinians, including by holding those responsible accountable,” they added.

The ministers pledged to take “concrete steps, in accordance with international law,” to counter the expansion of illegal settlements and policies or threats of forcible displacement and annexation.

Highlighting sensitivities around Jerusalem during Ramadan, they stressed the importance of preserving the historic and legal status quo at the city’s holy sites, recognizing the special role of the Hashemite custodianship of Jordan.

Reaffirming support for a negotiated settlement, the signatories said they remain committed to achieving “a just, comprehensive and lasting peace” on the basis of a two-state solution, in line with the Arab Peace Initiative and relevant UN resolutions, based on the June 4, 1967 lines.

“As reflected in the New York Declaration, the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is imperative for regional peace, stability and integration,” the statement said, adding that only the realization of an independent, sovereign and democratic Palestinian state would allow coexistence among the region’s peoples and states.