Pakistan to set up telecom tribunal to resolve years-old dispute with Etisalat

A man walks past a sign at the headquarters of telecommunications company Etisalat in Dubai on October 25, 2011. (REUTERS/File)
Short Url
Updated 27 October 2023
Follow

Pakistan to set up telecom tribunal to resolve years-old dispute with Etisalat

  • Pakistan, UAE’s Etisalat are in dispute over $800 mln payment from privatization of Pakistani telecom company
  • IT minister says consultations are underway for rolling out 5G services in the country within the next 8 months

KARACHI: Pakistan would establish a specialized court within next two weeks for prompt resolution of disputes relating to the country’s telecom sector, Caretaker Information Technology (IT) Minister Dr Umar Saif said late Thursday, a move that has rekindled hopes for the resolution of $800 million payment dispute with Emirati telecom giant Etisalat.    

The Telecom Appellate Tribunal for the Pakistani telecom sector will facilitate smooth and speedy adjudication of cases and help reduce burden on courts across the South Asian country, according to the minister.   

The tribunal will help ensure speedy justice to telecom sector stakeholders in cases that have been pending for years.      

“We are establishing Telecom Tribunal for reforms and resolution of disputes and cases in courts... the tribunal will be formed through an ordinance,” Saif said on the sidelines of an event in Karachi, in response to a query by Arab News about progress on a dispute between Pakistan and Emirati telecom giant Etisalat since 2005.   

“The tribunal will be set up in the next two weeks. The tribunal would be a specialized court where telecom service providers’ disputes will be resolved so that these cases could not be delayed for years.” 

The establishment of the dispute resolution tribunal is likely to help resolve nearly two-decade-old dispute between the Pakistani government and United Arab Emirates-based telecom service provider, Etisalat, involving a pending $800 million bill from the privatization of the Pakistan Telecommunication Company Limited (PTCL).    

An Etisalat consortium bought 26 percent stakes in PTCL for $2.6 billion in 2005 that gave the Emirati telecom giant majority voting rights. The UAE operator owned 90 percent of the acquiring consortium, giving it a 23.4 percent share in PTCL.  

Etisalat paid an initial $1.80 billion as per the deal, which also included transferring ownership of the properties to PTCL from the government. It was due to pay the remaining $800 million in six twice-yearly instalments of $133 million, however, the UAE telecom giant withheld the payment due to the dispute over mutation of some 34 out of 3,500 properties destined for PTCL.    

Pakistani officials have said in the past that the remaining properties could not be handed over due to ownership complications and the value of these properties would be deducted from the amount Etisalat owes. The dispute remains unresolved since 2005.    

Saif called the establishment of the tribunal a "big step" by the government and said the idea was being executed in a short span of time that would help the government improve telecom services.    

About the launch of 5G services in the country, he said these services would be rolled out within the next eight months.    

“When we joined the government, we announced that 5G service would be launched in 10 months so two months have gone and we are confident that the service will be launched in eight months through auction,” Saif replied.   

The minister said an inter-ministerial advisory committee for 5G auction had been formed and approved by the federal cabinet, while consultants had been engaged to take forward the process.    

“We have studied the global practice about the launch of 5G services, negotiating with telecom operators for more investment, improvement of required services, and providing quality service to people,” Saif said.   

“For these, whatever measures are required at the government level are being taken on fast-paced basis.”       

Speaking at the event earlier, the minister said IT companies had been allowed to retain 50 percent of their revenue in dollar accounts, while they would also be provided with corporate debit cards by banks to make international payments. 


Pakistan says it has received no request to join Gaza stabilization force

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan says it has received no request to join Gaza stabilization force

  • Foreign Office says any decision on participating in an international mechanism will be guided by sovereign policy considerations
  • It says Pakistan’s security collaboration with Saudi Arabia is longstanding and should not be narrowly viewed as troop deployment

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has not taken any decision on joining a proposed International Stabilization Force (ISF) for Gaza and has received no formal request from the United States or any other country in this regard, the foreign office said on Thursday.

Trump’s Gaza plan, outlined as part of a 20-point framework, envisages the deployment of troops from Muslim-majority countries during a transitional stabilization phase, intended to support security and governance as the war-ravaged Palestinian territory moves toward reconstruction and a longer-term political settlement.

International media outlets claim Washington views Pakistan as a potentially significant contributor given its battle-hardened military, which has fought a brief but intense conflict with India this year and continues to combat insurgencies in its remote regions.

Responding to a query during his weekly media briefing, the foreign office spokesperson, Tahir Andrabi, said discussions on ISF for Gaza were ongoing in “certain capitals,” but Pakistan had neither committed to participate nor received any specific request.

“We have not taken a sovereign decision to participate in ISF as yet,” he said. “I am not aware of any specific request made to Pakistan. We will inform you about any development if it takes place.”

He added that while Gaza and Palestine remain part of Pakistan’s broader diplomatic engagements with regional partners, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) and members of the United Nations Security Council, the issue of deploying a stabilization force had not been discussed as a standalone, structured agenda item.

“These discussions come up in the broader context of how to stabilize Gaza and ensure peace, but not as a specific, formal proposal,” he added.

The spokesperson maintained Pakistan supports efforts aimed at Gaza’s stabilization and peace but would make any decision on participation in international mechanisms strictly in line with its sovereign policy considerations.

In response to a question about a recent news report by Reuters about a possible visit by Pakistan’s Chief of Defense Forces Field Marshal Asim Munir to the United States to meet US President Donald Trump, Andrabi said there was no confirmation of such plans.

“I can contradict the report in its essence,” he said. “The report suggested as if a visit has been planned or finalized. I do not have any information on the timing or any future visit.”

Earlier, a White House official told Arab News on background no meeting was scheduled between Trump and Munir “at this time.”

The foreign office spokesperson stressed that official visits by Pakistan’s political or military leadership are announced formally by the government ahead of time.

“When an official visit takes place, there is an official announcement. I do not have any such information to share,” he added.

To a question regarding the Pakistan–Saudi Arabia Strategic Mutual Defense Agreement (SMDA) signed in September, he said security collaboration between Islamabad and Riyadh was longstanding, reiterating that the latest pact had only codified and further elaborated the partnership.

Andrabi maintained the pact should not be interpreted narrowly as the deployment of Pakistani forces, noting that defense cooperation covered a wide spectrum including training, joint exercises and institutional collaboration.

“As I said, it’s an ongoing process,” he said. “You should not read it just in the context of sending your forces. There are training, joint exercises that keep on going. If you interpret training as sending forces, I cannot say that. I mean, sending of forces is a very broad term. But our defense corporation, as I said, is ongoing.”