Pakistan to set up task forces to reduce electricity theft causing $1.9 billion revenue shortfall

Men work on electric pylons along the roadside in Karachi on May 30, 2021. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 06 September 2023
Follow

Pakistan to set up task forces to reduce electricity theft causing $1.9 billion revenue shortfall

  • The caretaker energy minister mentions special courts to deal with issues related to power theft in the country
  • Pakistan has recently witnessed widespread protests over high electricity bills that have mounted the cost of living

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s caretaker administration said on Wednesday it was setting up special task forces on provincial and district levels to combat massive electricity theft as the country grapples with a significant revenue shortfall of Rs589 billion ($1.9 billion) in the power sector annually.

The problem, which is more rampant in certain areas of the country than others, has forced successive governments to raise power tariffs in Pakistan.

Due to the widespread protests over inflated electricity bills and rising petroleum prices in recent days, however, the interim administration decided to take the issue head-on to rationalize power tariffs by minimizing its financial losses.

“We got the prime minister’s instructions to crack down on this, reduce the theft of electricity and recover revenue from those who do not pay the bills,” the country’s energy minister, Muhammad Ali, told reporters during a media briefing in Islamabad.

“We will establish a provincial-level task force, with the provincial secretary of energy or the home secretary leading it,” he continued. “At the divisional level, a task force will be formed under the commissioner’s leadership, and at the district level, the deputy commissioner will head it and at the sub-district level, the assistant commissioner will be in charge, whereas we will oversee all these activities from Islamabad.”

He said there were different levels of theft and recovery in different parts of Pakistan.

“The total loss due to theft or not receiving the bills during one year is Rs589 billion,” the minister added.

“We have all the data of the areas where electricity theft is more and we will pay greater attention to them and launch a crackdown to reduce the losses,” he continued.

Ali said the government had devised a strategy to deal with power theft.

“The areas where the theft of electricity is less – some 15 to 30 percent – we will intervene by using technology and rely on smart metering and other solutions,” he informed.

However, it would launch a proper enforcement mechanism at places where these losses exceed 60 percent.

At the same time, he noted that the government had made a list of those officers involved in the theft of electricity and would transfer them to other areas.

“We are working on an electricity theft control act and will establish an elaborate enforcement infrastructure in the country,” said the minister.

He informed the government also planned to set up special courts that would deal with complaints and punishments related to power theft in the country.

“Our target is to finalize the law in the next two to three weeks, move it forward, and send this ordinance for approval,” he added.


Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

  • Top court orders lower court to pause proceedings after lawyers allege due-process breaches
  • Mazari-Hazir, husband face charges under cybercrime law that carry up to 14 years in prison

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday halted the cybercrime trial of prominent human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after their lawyers argued that a lower court had recorded witness testimony in their absence, violating due-process rules.

Mazari-Hazir, one of Pakistan’s most outspoken civil liberties lawyers, and Chattha are being prosecuted under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over posts on X that authorities say incited ethnic divisions and portrayed the military as involved in “terrorism.” Both reject the allegations. If convicted under the relevant PECA provision, they face a prison term of up to 14 years.

The case has drawn broad attention in Pakistan’s legal community because Mazari-Hazir, who has been repeatedly detained over her criticism of the security establishment, argues that the trial court ignored basic procedural guarantees despite her medical leave request. The case also comes as Pakistan faces sustained scrutiny over the use of PECA against activists, journalists and political dissenters, with lawyers arguing that lower courts often move ahead without meeting minimum fair-trial standards.

The couple’s lawyer, Riasat Ali Azad, said his clients filed a petition in the Supreme Court because the lower court had moved ahead improperly.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has stayed the lower court proceedings, the trial court proceedings and has said that the [Islamabad] High Court should decide our pending revision petition for which a date has already been fixed,” he told reporters.

Azad said the violation was clear under Pakistan’s Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires evidence to be recorded in the presence of the accused.

“Yet, on that very day, evidence of four witnesses was recorded in their absence, and a state counsel was appointed to conduct cross-examination on their behalf,” he said. “All these things are against the right to a fair trial under Articles 10 and 10-A.”

A three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ordered the trial court to pause proceedings and instructed the Islamabad High Court to hear the couple’s pending criminal revision petition first.

The trial had been scheduled to resume on Dec.15, but the Supreme Court’s stay now freezes proceedings before both the additional sessions judge and the special PECA court. 

The Islamabad High Court is expected to hear the criminal revision petition next week.

Chattha, who is also a lawyer, said the SC ruling underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

“It is a victory for the constitution and the law,” he said, arguing that the trial court had ignored their request to re-record witness statements in their presence.