Zuckerberg and Musk throw verbal jabs over proposed cage match

Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk. (Reuters photos/file)
Short Url
Updated 14 August 2023
Follow

Zuckerberg and Musk throw verbal jabs over proposed cage match

  • Zuckerberg suggests Musk seems to be looking for an excuse to avoid a cage fight
  • “Zuck is a chicken,” Musk responds with a post on his X platform

WASHINGTON: Billionaires and social media business rivals Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk threw new online jabs at each other Sunday, with the Meta founder declaring the owner of X — formerly known as Twitter — was not treating a proposed charity cage match seriously.
“I think we can all agree Elon isn’t serious and it’s time to move on,” Zuckerberg wrote on his Threads social platform.
“I offered a real date... Elon won’t confirm a date, then says he needs surgery, and now asks to do a practice round in my backyard instead.”
Musk quickly responded on X, the platform he bought last year that was previously called Twitter.
“Zuck is a chicken,” Musk posted.
The Tesla boss said he would head to Silicon Valley Monday: “Can’t wait to bang on his door tomorrow.”
When an X user suggested Zuckerberg was getting cold feet about the match, Musk referred to a popular US fast food chain known for its chicken offerings.
“He can’t eat at Chick-fil-A because that would be cannibalism,” Musk posted.




This picture posted by Elon Musk on his account on his X platform, formerly known as Twitter, seems to have led Mark Zuckerberg to think Musk is not serious about the cage fight he has proposed. (X photo)

The two tech titans have gone back and forth on social media about fighting each other in a much-hyped charity match.
Musk said Friday the fight would take place in Italy, as authorities there confirmed talks about hosting a “great charity event.”
“I spoke to the PM of Italy and Minister of Culture,” Musk wrote, referring to Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. “They have agreed on an epic location.”
In response, Zuckerberg posted a photo of himself shirtless and pinning down an opponent in his “backyard octagon.”
A martial arts enthusiast who has taken part in jiujitsu competitions, Zuckerberg said, “I love this sport and I’ve been ready to fight since the day Elon challenged me.”
“If he ever agrees on an actual date, you’ll hear it from me. Until then, please assume anything he says has not been agreed on.”
Italian Culture Minister Gennaro Sangiuliano confirmed speaking to Musk about “how to organize a great charity event evoking history” but said any match “will not be held in Rome.”
Sangiuliano said any event with Musk would raise “a huge sum, many millions of euros, (that) will be donated to two important Italian pediatric hospitals.”
The two tech tycoons, who have occasionally jousted from afar, became direct competitors after Zuckerberg’s Meta launched its Twitter-like Threads platform in early July.
Musk noted on Friday that he may need to undergo “minor surgery” to resolve a “problem with my right shoulder blade rubbing against my ribs.”
“Recovery will only take a few months,” he added.
The world’s richest person has a titanium plate holding two vertebrae together but said Friday it is currently “not an issue.”
 


Press groups slam Israel’s ongoing ban on foreign journalists entering Gaza

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Press groups slam Israel’s ongoing ban on foreign journalists entering Gaza

  • Israeli government did not officially explain why it continues to block journalists, despite earlier pledges to reexamine its position
  • Government’s next response is due by Dec. 21, though court observers warn this deadline may once again be extended

LONDON: Press freedom advocates and international news organizations have condemned Israel’s ban on international journalists entering Gaza despite a nearly two-month-long ceasefire with Hamas.

On Thursday, Israel’s Supreme Court granted yet another extension for the government to respond to the case, the ninth delay since a petition was filed by the Foreign Press Association in Israel in September 2024, demanding open access for foreign correspondents to report from the war-torn enclave.

The delay drew condemnations, with The New York Times, one of the media organizations supporting the legal challenge, saying the restrictions are “limiting reporting on the ground that is vital to understanding the conflict and assuring the free and credible flow of information.”

In a statement quoted by the newspaper, a spokesperson urged Israel to “lift restrictions without delay, allowing all journalists to work securely and without fear or hesitation.”

Sara Qudah, Middle East and North Africa director at the Committee to Protect Journalists, said the ban echoed press crackdowns seen in authoritarian regimes, calling it “a deliberate barrier to accountability.”

Israel has come under intensifying pressure to allow journalists inside Gaza throughout the years of the war.

Since the start of the Gaza war in October 2023, Israeli authorities have prevented foreign journalists from independently entering the devastated territory, allowing only a handful of reporters to accompany its troops into the Palestinian territory under Israeli blockade.

Reporters said they were not permitted to conduct independent investigations or speak freely with residents during the coverage tours.

Human rights organizations and press freedom advocates said the absence of international media has made it harder to independently verify war crimes or abuses committed by Israel and Hamas.

While Israel has previously cited “security concerns” and the need to protect military operations as justification, press groups maintain that such arguments no longer hold, especially in the current ceasefire climate.

The Israeli government did not officially explain why it continues to block journalists, despite earlier pledges to reexamine its position. In October, the government told the court it would review the policy within 30 days “in light of the ceasefire,” but no changes have followed.

The government’s next response is due by Dec. 21, though court observers warn this deadline may once again be extended.

The CPJ reported that more than 200 Palestinian journalists and media workers have been killed in Gaza during the war, calling it “the deadliest conflict for journalists since CPJ began documenting deaths in 1992.”

A day after the latest court extension, FPA released a statement, saying it “firmly opposed” another delay to the Israeli supreme court’s decision on its petition demanding independent access to the Gaza Strip.

“Continuously preventing coverage — every minute, every hour, every day — seriously undermines the ability of international media to carry out their mission, and infringes on the fundamental rights of billions of users,” the FPA said in a statement.

The association represents hundreds of foreign journalists working for international news organizations in Israel and the Palestinian territories.

In October, it joined numerous international organizations that have demanded press access into Gaza. In July, major news agencies including AFP, AP, BBC and Reuters released a joint statement urging Israel to allow journalists in and out of Gaza, voicing concerns on the status of Palestinian journalists enduring famine, bombardment and displacement while covering the war for international outlets.