Arrest of Pakistan’s Imran Khan an ‘internal matter’, US says

Lawyers in support of Pakistan's former Prime Minister Imran Khan, denounce his arrest during a protest outside the High court in Lahore, Pakistan, on August 7, 2023. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 08 August 2023
Follow

Arrest of Pakistan’s Imran Khan an ‘internal matter’, US says

  • Khan initially alleged is ouster from office last year was backed by Washington and orchestrated by Pakistan’s top generals
  • US response to Khan’s legal woes has been muted compared with prosecution of other opposition figures around the world

WASHINGTON: The arrest of Imran Khan is Pakistan’s “internal matter,” a US State Department spokesman said on Monday, declining to take a position on the legal troubles of the former prime minister and frequent US critic.

Police arrested Khan in Lahore on Saturday after a court sentenced him to three years in prison for illegally selling state gifts. The guilty verdict could stop the opposition leader from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf party from contesting a national election later this year.

Khan denies wrongdoing and maintains the government and the powerful military — which has run the country for about half of its 75-year history — imposed fabricated charges on him.

“We believe that is an internal matter for Pakistan,” State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said in a press briefing on Monday, when asked whether the US thought Khan got a fair trial.

“At times there are cases (around the world) that are so obviously unfounded that the United States believes it should say something about the matter. We have not made that determination here,” Miller added.

Khan initially alleged that his ouster from office in a parliamentary vote last year was backed by Washington and orchestrated by Pakistan’s top generals. Washington and the military both denied this.

Analysts noted that the US response to Khan’s legal woes has been muted compared with the prosecution of other opposition figures around the world.

“I think Khan blaming the US for his ouster last year certainly hasn’t helped matters for him. The US has since steered clear of commenting in any specific terms on Pakistan’s politics,” said Madiha Afzal, a fellow in the Foreign Policy program at Brookings Institution, a Washington-based think-tank.

CRITIC OF WASHINGTON

Khan has been a critic of US foreign policy almost throughout his political life. During his years as a rising politician, the former cricket star was among the fiercest critics of US drone attacks targeting militants along the country’s Afghan border, which he termed extra-judicial killings and a violation of Pakistan’s sovereignty.

He celebrated the United States’ defeat in Afghanistan when the Taliban took over in 2021 after the withdrawal of NATO and US forces and described it as Afghanistan having broken “the chains of slavery.”

Michael Kugelman, the director of the South Asia Institute at the Wilson Center think-tank in Washington, thinks Khan’s relentless past criticism means he does not have much sympathy in Washington.

“I expect the US to stay quiet,” Kugelman said.

Khan, 70, is the South Asian nation’s most popular leader, according to opinion polls. A separate brief arrest in May on another set of corruption charges sparked deadly unrest, and ended when the Supreme Court called for him to be released.

As arrests of Khan’s party workers increased after the deadly violence and human rights groups alleged abuse of power by Pakistan’s forces, Kugelman said a strong US stance against the crackdown could have been perceived as taking Khan’s side.

“Khan has burned many bridges in DC. He’s not viewed as a terribly sympathetic figure here these days. So the administration (of President Joe Biden) isn’t keen to go out of its way to do him any favors.”

Kugelman said Pakistan was no longer as big a regional priority for Washington as it was while US forces waged a war in neighboring Afghanistan.


Pakistan, seven Muslim nations back Palestinian technocratic body, stress Gaza-West Bank unity

Updated 15 January 2026
Follow

Pakistan, seven Muslim nations back Palestinian technocratic body, stress Gaza-West Bank unity

  • The National Committee for the Administration of the Gaza Strip was announced on January 14
  • Muslim nations call for consolidation of the ceasefire and unimpeded humanitarian aid into Gaza

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan and seven other Muslim-majority countries on Thursday welcomed the formation of a temporary Palestinian technocratic body to administer Gaza, stressing that it must manage daily civilian affairs while preserving the institutional and territorial link between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank amid the ongoing peace efforts.

In a joint statement, the foreign ministers of Pakistan, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Türkiye, Indonesia and the United Arab Emirates said the newly announced National Committee for the Administration of the Gaza Strip would play a central role during the second phase of a broader peace plan aimed at ending the war and paving the way for Palestinian self-governance.

“The Ministers emphasize the importance of the National Committee commencing its duties in managing the day-to-day affairs of the people of Gaza, while preserving the institutional and territorial link between the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, ensuring the unity of Gaza, and rejecting any attempts to divide it,” the statement said.

The committee, announced on Jan. 14, is a temporary transitional body established under United Nations Security Council Resolution 2803 and is to operate in coordination with the Palestinian Authority, the ministers said.

The statement said the move forms part of the second phase of US President Donald Trump’s Comprehensive Peace Plan for Gaza, which the ministers said they supported, praising Trump’s efforts to end the war, ensure the withdrawal of Israeli forces and prevent the annexation of the occupied West Bank.

The top leaders of all eight Muslim countries attended a meeting with Trump in New York last September, shortly before he unveiled the Gaza peace plan.

The ministers also called for the consolidation of the ceasefire, unimpeded humanitarian aid into Gaza, early recovery and reconstruction and the eventual return of the Palestinian Authority to administer the territory, leading to a just and sustainable peace based on UN resolutions and a two-state solution on pre-1967 lines with East Jerusalem as the Palestinian capital.