Singapore executes fifth prisoner this year for drug trafficking

Singapore has some of the world’s toughest anti-drug laws – trafficking more than 500 grams of cannabis or over 15 grams of heroin can result in the death penalty. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 03 August 2023
Follow

Singapore executes fifth prisoner this year for drug trafficking

  • Mohamed Shalleh Adul Latiff was sentenced to death for possessing around 55 grams of heroin ‘for the purpose of trafficking’ in 2019

SINGAPORE: Singapore executed a 39-year-old man who was convicted of trafficking heroin, the city-state’s fifth hanging this year and the third in just over a week, authorities said on Thursday.
Mohamed Shalleh Adul Latiff was sentenced to death for possessing around 55 grams of heroin “for the purpose of trafficking” in 2019.
His punishment was carried out on Thursday, the Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) said in a statement.
According to court documents, Mohamed Shalleh worked as a delivery driver before his arrest in 2016. During his trial, he claimed to have believed he was delivering contraband cigarettes for a friend to whom he owed money.
He became the 16th prisoner sent to the gallows since the government resumed executions in March 2022 after a two-year pause during the Covid-19 pandemic.
The execution comes less than a week after Singapore executed the first woman in nearly 20 years for drug trafficking despite condemnation from rights groups.
Saridewi Binte Djamani, a 45-year-old Singaporean, was executed on Friday for trafficking around 30 grams of heroin.
A local man, Mohd Aziz bin Hussain, 57, had been hanged two days earlier for trafficking about 50 grams of heroin.
The United Nations last week denounced the hangings and called for Singapore to impose a moratorium on the death penalty.
Despite growing international pressure on the issue, Singapore insists that the death penalty is an effective deterrent against drug trafficking.
The wealthy financial center has some of the world’s toughest anti-drug laws — trafficking more than 500 grams of cannabis or over 15 grams of heroin can result in the death penalty.


Palestinian family living in Gaza tent denied evacuation to UK despite appeal by academic father

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Palestinian family living in Gaza tent denied evacuation to UK despite appeal by academic father

  • Bassem Abudagga, studying for a PhD in York, was told his wife and children’s case not ‘compelling’ enough
  • Family must give biometric data for their visas despite no facilities providing the service in Gaza

LONDON: The UK Home Office has told a Palestinian academic studying in Britain that his wife and children would not be brought to the UK from Gaza as their case is not “sufficiently compelling” for evacuation.

In a letter, the department told Bassem Abudagga his family would need to attend a visa application center in Gaza to provide biometric data before traveling, despite there being no such facility in the enclave.

Abudagga, studying on a scholarship for a doctorate at York St John University, has not seen his family since September 2023, three weeks before the Hamas-led attack on Israel that sparked a regional war. His wife Marim, son Karim, aged 6, and daughter Talya, 10, are living in a tent after their house was destroyed.

On receiving the Home Office letter, Abudagga told The Guardian: “I felt my final hope of being reunited with my wife and children after more than three years had been lost. It was very, very hard.”

He added that his wife “kept saying to me when I called, ‘It seems we will never meet again. Don’t make any more efforts to bring us to the UK because it seems the UK will never get us there. Just keep concentrating on your studies.’”

The letter added that Abudagga’s family’s situation had also been measured against “the interests of national and border security.”

Abudagga said: “When I read that they link bringing my family to the UK with UK security, and suggest the children are better off in Gaza, I simply could not believe in British values and norms anymore. I expected the British government cared about family life, about human rights.”

He had asked the Home Office to give a decision in principle on whether his family’s visa applications would be accepted before requiring his wife to give biometric data. This would have allowed the family to appeal to be evacuated to a third country with a VAC in order to speed up their application. The request was denied.

The Home Office said it was “not satisfied that (the family’s) circumstances are sufficiently compelling for (us) to be able to deviate from our normal policy that requires your clients to attend a VAC prior to consideration of their applications.”

It added that, as Abudagga claimed he eventually wished to return to Gaza, his UK stay was only temporary.

“Consequently it is appropriate for your minor clients to remain with their primary carer, their mother, until circumstances change,” the Home Office said.

The letter said that “circumstances in Gaza are difficult and that due to displacement it may be more difficult to access certain necessities,” but continued that the department was “not satisfied” there was enough evidence to prove the family needed to be evacuated before “it is safe to visit a VAC.”

While trapped in Gaza, Marim has also had to contend with the death of her father two weeks ago.

“My wife is trying to do the daily duties of bringing food, securing the tent from the weather — it is very cold, very windy, very rainy — when her father passed away two weeks ago,” Abudagga said. “The details are very, very hard.”

Another student in the UK was recently permitted to bring her family from Gaza after they were approved to perform biometric checks in Jordan.

“This lady was allowed to get her fingerprints done in Jordan and the Home Office later allowed her family to join. The case is the same as mine,” Abudagga told The Guardian.

Rebecca Long-Bailey, Abudagga’s local MP, wrote to Shabana Mahmood, the home secretary, to ask the Home Office to reconsider the case, but the decision was upheld. Abudagga has since begun the process of legally challenging it.

Sarah Crowe, a lawyer at law firm Leigh Day representing the family, told The Guardian: “We will be writing to the Home Office to set out why their decision-making in this case is plainly unlawful. In line with the Home Office’s own policy, Bassem’s family should have their applications predetermined, which is an important step in reuniting the family.”