Global tech coalition warns Pakistan’s data bill may deter business and investment

In this picture taken on January 8, 2022, employees of call centre speak with clients in Lahore, Pakistan. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 26 July 2023
Follow

Global tech coalition warns Pakistan’s data bill may deter business and investment

  • The Asia Internet Coalition says the bill is likely to limit the country’s access to many global digital services
  • It asks the government to undertake transparent stakeholder consultations to develop balanced regulation

ISLAMABAD: An industry association of leading technology companies in the world warned on Wednesday the Personal Data Protection Bill that is expected to be introduced in Pakistan’s parliament would raise the cost of doing business and negatively impact foreign investment in the country.

The Asia Internet Coalition (AIC) was established in 2010 and is headquartered in Singapore. It brings together major technology firms such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, Amazon, Apple, and others to collaborate on matters related to Internet regulations, data privacy, online content regulations, cybersecurity, and other policy areas that impact the digital economy.

It wrote a letter to the country’s information technology minister, Syed Amin ul Haque, in June, saying the bill mandated that critical personal data should only be processed in Pakistan.

It also raised other concerns and urged the government to set maximum fine payable for breaches of the bill while pointing out that it did not address a majority of the industry’s substantive concerns.

“The Asia Internet Coalition is alarmed that the Personal Data Protection Bill is expected to be introduced in Parliament despite concerns raised repeatedly by Industry about the Bill’s many problematic provisions,” said the AIC statement.

“In its current form, the Bill falls short of international standards for data protection and creates unnecessary complexities that will increase the cost of doing business and dampen foreign investment,” it added.

It maintained that by requiring unspecified “critical” data to be stored locally and through significantly restricting the cross-border transfer of all other personal data, the bill would limit Pakistan’s access to many global digital services.

“This Bill creates additional barriers to digital trade as a critical time when Pakistan’s economic growth demands paramount attention,” the statement continued. “For such an important piece of legislation that will profoundly impact Pakistani consumers, businesses, and, ultimately, the country’s economic growth, the Government should undertake transparent stakeholder consultations to develop balanced regulation that supports the country’s digital growth and fulfils the nation’s vision of a Digital Pakistan.”

The AIC statement comes at a time when the government is planning to strengthen the country’s information technology sector.

Earlier this month, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif vowed to boost Pakistan’s IT exports to $20 billion within the next two to three years, saying that the current export figure of $2.5 billion was not reflective of the actual potential of the country.


Walnut tree remains ‘under arrest’ for over a century, living symbol of colonial power in Pakistan

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Walnut tree remains ‘under arrest’ for over a century, living symbol of colonial power in Pakistan

  • British officer is said to have ordered chaining of the tree in 1898, a reminder of the absolute authority and psychological control enforced under colonial rule in Khyber Pass region
  • Locals and historians say the shackled tree survives as a physical memory of the Frontier Crimes Regulation era, when even nature could be punished to discipline subjects and display power

LANDI KOTAL, KHYBER: In the military cantonment of Landi Kotal, close to Pakistan’s Torkham border crossing with Afghanistan and the mouth of the historic Khyber Pass, a single walnut tree stands bound in heavy iron chains.

It has been this way for more than a century, a surreal, almost absurd monument to the power structures and punitive imagination of the British Empire’s rule in the tribal frontier.

Black shackles still brace parts of its branches, giving it the appearance of a theatrical installation. To locals, it is a wound that never fully healed, a reminder that even nature could be punished when authority wished to show dominance.

Local oral histories trace the origin of this bizarre imprisonment to 1898, when a British officer named James Squid, allegedly intoxicated, believed the tree was moving toward him and instantly ordered it arrested. Soldiers carried out the instruction and the walnut tree has never been freed since.

Muhammad Sardar, the caretaker who oversees the site today, recounted the story as it has been passed down for generations.

“This British military official at that time was drunk and thought this walnut tree was moving toward him to attack him,” he told Arab News. “The officer ordered to arrest this tree, hence the soldiers had to obey the order and arrest this tree.”

Whether the event unfolded exactly as described is impossible to verify, but historians and residents agree on what the continued chaining represented: the unquestionable authority of colonial power.

A LAW THAT COULD BIND PEOPLE — AND TREES

Landi Kotal was one of the most militarized points of the British-controlled frontier, a strategic chokepoint along the Khyber Pass, a route armies, traders and empires have used for thousands of years. To control the region, the British introduced the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR), a law that denied locals the right to appeal, hire lawyers or challenge government decisions. Entire tribes could be punished for the suspected action of one member.

The chained walnut tree is often interpreted as a physical embodiment of that era: a warning made visible.

Dr. Syed Waqar Ali Shah, Assistant Professor of History at the University of Peshawar, said the symbolism was deliberate.

“It was an assertion of their [British] authority, it was a symbol of their power. Right. It’s a funny thing as well, because it’s something which was under the influence of some intoxication,” he explained.

“The officer behaved or gave orders for the imprisonment of that particular tree under the influence of some intoxicants.”

Dr. Shah continued:

“It was something which was a symbol of colonial authority, assertion of their authority, of bureaucratic diplomacy, a symbol of their bureaucratic strength and power, and maybe some cultural encounter as well.”

He added that such displays endured because “it was a cultural link between the locals and the colonial power. So it was a reflection of that. But later on, they continued with it in the presence of FCR (Frontier Crimes Regulation) and regulations like this.”

Even once the officer sobered, the chains remained.

Dr. Shah believes that was intentional: psychological messaging meant to instill conformity and fear in people living under colonial law.

“Their objective and purpose was to make it a symbol of discipline for the masses. It was an exhibition of power, a sheer exhibition of power, a symbol that if we can do this to something which was inhuman … if they can deal with a tree like this, so the general public, they should be aware that discipline is very important.”

Landi Kotal’s older residents say their fathers and grandfathers retold the story long before Pakistan existed and long before independence movements dismantled the Raj.

Usman Khan Shinwari, a 26-year-old shopkeeper, said the story continues to live in households like a family inheritance.

“My grandfather would often narrate this story of the arrested tree,” he recalled. “My grandfather would say that it shows how the then rulers were treating the locals and what our ancestors had endured.”

Over a century later, long after the end of British rule and the formal abolition of the Frontier Crimes Regulation in 2018, the walnut tree remains exactly where it was chained, part spectacle, part scar.

Tourists sometimes come to photograph it. Others stand silently before it.

But for many in Khyber, it is neither attraction nor curiosity.

It is proof that power once flowed one way only. A tree could be punished, so people learned not to resist.