‘Highly likely’ Russia behind Ukraine dam collapse – international experts

The destruction of Kakhovka dam in southern Ukraine unleashed floodwaters that destroyed farmland and cut off water supplies to a large part of the population. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 16 June 2023
Follow

‘Highly likely’ Russia behind Ukraine dam collapse – international experts

  • Vladimir Putin has accused Ukraine of destroying Kakhovka dam as a Western-backed tactic to escalate the conflict
  • The vast Soviet-era Kakhovka hydroelectric dam was breached in the early hours of June 6

AMSTERDAM: It is “highly likely” that the collapse of the Kakhovka dam in southern Ukraine was caused by explosives planted by Russians, a team of legal experts assisting Ukraine’s prosecutors in their investigation said in preliminary findings released on Friday.
Russian President Vladimir Putin has accused Ukraine of destroying the Kakhovka dam as a Western-backed tactic to escalate the conflict.
Ukraine is investigating the blast as a war crime and possible criminal environmental destruction, or “ecocide.”
The vast Soviet-era Kakhovka hydroelectric dam, under Russian control since the Feb. 24 invasion, was breached in the early hours of June 6, unleashing floodwater across a swathe of the battleground in southern Ukraine, destroying farmland and cutting off water supplies to a large part of the population.
Experts with the international human rights law firm Global Rights Compliance, which is implementing Western-back efforts to support accountability for atrocities in Ukraine, visited the Kherson region from June 10-11 with Ukraine’s prosecutor general and a team from the International Criminal Court.
“The evidence and analysis of the information available – which includes seismic sensors and discussions with top demolition experts – indicates that there is a high probability the destruction was caused by pre-emplaced explosives positioned at critical points within the dam’s structure,” a summary of preliminary findings from the law firm’s team seen by Reuters said.
Senior lawyer Yousuf Syed Khan at Global Rights Compliance, who participated in the field mission to Kherson, said the finding that the dam was blown up with pre-emplaced explosives by the Russian side “is an 80 percent and above determination.”
The finding is based “not only on seismic sensors, and one of the leading open-source intelligence providers, but also based on patterns of attack and other attacks that we have documented,” he said in an interview. That included previous attacks on critical water infrastructure, including installations and pipelines, he said.
They dismissed the theory that a catastrophic dam breach could have been caused by mismanagement alone.
The destruction of the dam and impact on the Kakhovka reservoir and surrounding area has created conditions which the investigators said could constitute a starvation crime by targeting “an object indispensable to the survival of the civilian population,” Khan said.
The attack may form part of a broader crime against humanity, but the group has not yet made that determination.
Attacking a dam intentionally may constitute a war crime under international humanitarian law because they are presumed to be civilian in nature, unless there is a valid military objective, British Barrister Catriona Murdoch, who led the mobile justice team investigation, said in a statement.
“Even in the highly unlikely scenario the dam, or indeed the area nearby, posed a valid military objective commensurate with eviscerating the dam, it is still afforded an elevated protection under international humanitarian law,” she said.
The ICC, the world’s permanent war crimes tribunal, is also investigating the attacks on Ukraine’s infrastructure, which may violate international law.


Trump ‘very disappointed’ with UK’s Starmer for blocking use of air bases, Telegraph says

Updated 02 March 2026
Follow

Trump ‘very disappointed’ with UK’s Starmer for blocking use of air bases, Telegraph says

  • UK PM then said bases could ‌be used in “defensive” operations
  • Trump says it took “too long” for Starmer to change his mind

LONDON: Donald Trump said he was “very disappointed” with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer for not allowing the US to use the Diego Garcia air base to carry out strikes on Iran, the Daily Telegraph quoted the US president as saying in an interview.
Britain had reportedly initially ‌denied the US ‌permission to conduct air strikes ​from ‌its ⁠bases, ​but on ⁠Sunday evening Starmer said he was accepting a request for their use in any “defensive” strikes the US wanted to make against Iranian targets.
In an interview published on Monday Trump told the British newspaper that it took “too long” for Starmer to change ⁠his mind.
“That’s probably never happened between our ‌countries before,” he told ‌the Telegraph, adding: “It sounds like ​he was worried about the ‌legality.”
Trump said Starmer should have approved from ‌the get-go the American use of Diego Garcia — a strategically important US-UK air base in the Indian Ocean — saying Iran was responsible for killing “a lot of people from ‌your country.”
Britain was not involved in the joint US-Israel air strikes on Iran ⁠that killed ⁠the country’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on Saturday.
Since attacks on Iran started on Saturday, Iran has been targeting Gulf countries with missiles, and on Sunday an Iranian-made drone hit Britain’s RAF Akrotiri base in Cyprus, causing limited damage and no casualties.
Trump said it was “useful” that the US would now be able to launch operations from Diego Garcia, as he also criticized a deal Starmer ​has made over ​the sovereignty of the Chagos Islands, where Diego Garcia is based.