Meta hit with record $1.3 billion fine over EU data rules

EU regulators have hit Meta with four fines in six months over data breaches by its Instagram, WhatsApp and Facebook services. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 23 May 2023
Follow

Meta hit with record $1.3 billion fine over EU data rules

  • Meta also ordered to stop transfer of data to US
  • Largest-ever fine comes as long-awaited EU-US pact has yet to be announced

DUBLIN: Facebook owner Meta has been fined a record 1.2 billion euros ($1.3 billion) for transferring EU user data to the United States in breach of a previous court ruling, Ireland’s regulator announced on Monday.
The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC), which acts on behalf of the European Union, said the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) had ordered it to collect “an administrative fine in the amount of 1.2 billion euros.”
The DPC has been investigating Meta Ireland’s transfer of personal data from the EU to the United States since 2020.
It found that Meta, which has its European headquarters in Dublin, failed to “address the risks to the fundamental rights and freedoms of data subjects” that were identified in a previous ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).
The CJEU interprets EU law to make sure it is applied in the same way in all member states.
In response, Meta said it was “disappointed to have been singled out” and the ruling was “flawed, unjustified and sets a dangerous precedent for the countless other companies.”
“We intend to appeal both the decision’s substance and its orders including the fine, and will seek a stay through the courts to pause the implementation deadlines,” Meta president of global affairs Nick Clegg and chief legal officer Jennifer Newstead said in a blog post.
“There is no immediate disruption to Facebook in Europe,” they added.
Meta said it hopes to see the US and EU adopt a new legal framework for the use of personal data in the coming months, following an agreement in principle last year, which could allow it to continue its data transfer practices.

EU regulators have hit Meta with four fines in six months — and three this year — over data breaches by its Instagram, WhatsApp and Facebook services.
In January, the DPC fined the social media giant 390 million euros for breaking data rules in its use of targeted advertising on its apps.
In March, Meta was made to pay 5.5 million euros for breaching the GDPR with its WhatsApp messaging service.
Online trader Amazon was fined 746 million euros in Luxembourg in 2021 for infringing the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
In the latest case, the DPC had initially wanted to force Meta to suspend the offending data transfers, saying that a fine “would exceed the extent of powers that could be described as being ‘appropriate, proportionate and necessary’.”
But its peer regulators in the EU, known as Concerned Supervisory Authorities (CSAs), disagreed and said it should be “subject to an administrative fine,” the DPC said.
With no hope of consensus, the Irish body referred the objections to the EDPB, which ruled that Meta Ireland must suspend future transfer of personal data to the United States and pay a fine.

Clegg and Newstead said the EDPB decision to overrule the DPC “raises serious questions.”
“No country has done more than the US to align with European rules via their latest reforms, while transfers continue largely unchallenged to countries such as China,” they added.
But EDPB chair Andrea Jelinek characterised Meta’s infringement as “very serious” and called its data transfers “systematic, repetitive and continuous.”
“The unprecedented fine is a strong signal to organizations that serious infringements have far-reaching consequences,” she added.
Privacy activist Max Schrems, who set off a decade of legal battles with his challenge against Meta over the movement of EU data to the United States, welcomed the decision.
“Ever since Edward Snowden’s revelations on US big tech aiding the (National Security Agency) mass surveillance apparatus, Facebook (now Meta) was subject to litigation in Ireland,” said his organization, the European Center for Digital Rights.
But Schrems said far harsher sanctions could have been used as Meta had “knowingly broken the law to make a profit.”
“It took us 10 years of litigation against the Irish DPC to get to this result... and risked millions of procedural costs,” he added.
“The Irish regulator has done everything to avoid this decision,” he added.


Western media refute Trump’s claims Iran possesses Tomahawk missiles

Updated 10 March 2026
Follow

Western media refute Trump’s claims Iran possesses Tomahawk missiles

  • Speaking to journalists, Trump suggested Tehran used US-made cruise missile in school attack that killed over 170, calling the weapon ‘very generic’
  • CNN, Sky News and analysts said that ‘neither Israel nor Iran use Tomahawk missiles,’ urged accurate identification to ensure credibility in public discourse

LONDON: Western media outlets and defense analysts have pushed back against claims by US President Donald Trump that Iran possesses Tomahawk cruise missiles, after he raised the possibility while discussing a recent strike on an Iranian school that has drawn international scrutiny.

Speaking to reporters on Monday, Trump suggested Iran may have used Tomahawks in the attack, calling the weapon “very generic” and implying that multiple countries, including Iran, could have access to the system.

However, journalists and weapons experts swiftly disputed that assertion. They noted that Tomahawk missiles are US-manufactured cruise missile systems that Washington supplies only to a small number of close allies, primarily the UK and Australia. There is no credible evidence that Iran has ever obtained the weapon.

CNN anchor Erin Burnett referenced an investigation by correspondent Isobel Yeong that concluded “neither Israel nor Iran use Tomahawk missiles, according to experts.” Sky News and other Western outlets also challenged Trump’s remarks.

Analysts pointed out that Iran has developed its own domestic cruise missile systems, such as the Soumar and Hoveyzeh, which are believed to be based partly on older Soviet-era designs.

While these systems resemble cruise missiles in concept, experts say they differ significantly from the Tomahawk in design, propulsion configuration and operational characteristics.

While Iran has made substantial advances in ballistic and domestically produced cruise missiles over the past two decades, defense analysts said there is no verified evidence that Tehran holds the American-made system.

The episode reflects a broader pattern in which statements about military technology are rapidly scrutinized by open-source investigators and defense experts.

Experts say the distinction is important: accurately identifying the type of missile used in a strike can provide clues about the likely actor responsible, the launch platform involved and the broader geopolitical consequences of a strike.

Analysts also say that accurate identification of military systems remains essential for avoiding misinformation and for maintaining credibility in public discourse surrounding regional security.

Despite the growing body of evidence, the precise circumstances of the school attack nonetheless remain unclear, with investigators hampered by a lack of weapons fragments and limited access to the site.

Norway-based rights group Hengaw said the school was holding its morning session at the time of the reported attack and had at least 168 children and 14 teachers.

Trump said the US was continuing to investigate the incident. “Whatever the report shows, I’m willing to live with that report,” he said.