Journalists are being ‘used as tokens’ in grand political struggle, WSJ tells Arab News

The US has declared Gershkovich “wrongfully detained.” (WSJ/Sourced)
Short Url
Updated 11 April 2023
Follow

Journalists are being ‘used as tokens’ in grand political struggle, WSJ tells Arab News

  • 'Worrying trend of journalism around the world being criminalized and then used in this way,' says WSJ foreign correspondent
  • Russia formally charged WSJ reporter Evan Gershkovich with espionage, reports TASS

LONDON: There is a worrying trend in which journalists are being used as tokens to broker deals, the Wall Street Journal’s Stephen Kalin told Arab News.

“We’re seeing a worrying trend of journalism around the world being criminalized and then used in this way, and journalists being used as tokens,” Kalin, a foreign correspondent with WSJ who is based in the Gulf, told Arab News.

“That’s really not acceptable in any place,” he said.

Moscow has formally charged WSJ reporter Evan Gershkovich with espionage, Russian news agencies reported Friday, adding that he had denied the accusations.

His arrest has prompted an outcry from media outlets and rights groups, as well as government officials in Washington.

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken designated Gershkovich as “wrongfully detained” — terminology used for political hostages.

“Journalism is not a crime,” State Department spokesman Vedant Patel said in a statement. “We call for the Russian Federation to immediately release Mr. Gershkovich.”

Kalin explained: “The (US) administration has been very communicative with our institution, our newspaper, and responsive to our concerns that this is extremely serious and that we need their full attention to help secure his release. 

“The wrongful detention designation is useful because it opens up some new channels within the US government. There’s a hostage office inside of the White House, represented by Roger Carstens.”

Kalin, like many of his colleagues, understands the dangers that come with reporting from a war zone.

“Evan is a journalist. He’s got a long history of conducting journalism in Russia and outside of Russia...He’s well-known in the journalism community. He’s well-known to the Russian authorities as an accredited journalist,” Kalin said.

“The charges against him are really ludicrous, as far as we can tell. They’re politically motivated…He’s sort of caught in a bigger political struggle.”

The Kremlin, through its spokesperson, downplayed the US designation.

“The United States could and should protect the rights of its citizen who was caught red-handed (and) violated the relevant laws of the Russian Federation. He is suspected of such. Naturally, the decision will be made by the court. (That’s) all there is to say,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said.

US President Joe Biden said on Tuesday that Russia's imprisonment of Gershkovich was "totally illegal," adding that “it changes the dynamic,” AFP news agency reported.


Lebanon’s official media scale back Hezbollah coverage after Cabinet ban

Updated 12 March 2026
Follow

Lebanon’s official media scale back Hezbollah coverage after Cabinet ban

  • Information Minister Paul Morcos instructs outlets to comply with government decision
  • Journalists, social media urged to avoid content that could provoke hate speech, incitement

BEIRUT: Lebanon has begun implementing a Cabinet decision taken earlier this month to ban Hezbollah’s security and military activities by scaling back coverage of the group on official media platforms.

The measure, which was described in political circles as a significant and bold step, came after decades during which news about the party and the speeches of its leaders were published verbatim and broadcast live through official media outlets, like the state-run National News Agency, TV station Tele Liban and Radio Lebanon.

“No one is imposing censorship,” an official source told Arab News.

“Rather, there is a commitment to the decisions of the state. It is no longer possible for a speech that attacks the Lebanese government and the state to be published through its official media outlets.”

Information Minister Paul Morcos issued a circular instructing directors of official media outlets to comply with the government’s decision to ban the broadcast of speeches or statements by Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem and statements issued by the group’s armed wing, particularly when they contain criticism of the state.

Morcos also ordered that Hezbollah statements be handled in the same manner as those issued by other political parties, meaning they should not be published verbatim. He further instructed media outlets to avoid using the term “Islamic resistance,” except when it appears directly within Hezbollah statements.

The first manifestations of the decision were Tele Liban’s abstention from live broadcasting a speech by Qassem and a statement made on Tuesday by lawmaker Mohammed Raad, who heads the Hezbollah parliamentary bloc.

The group’s supporters described the move as an attempt “to restrict the resistance, Hezbollah and its leadership in the official media.”

Some argued on social media that preventing the use of terms like “resistance” or “holy warriors (Mujahedin)” and replacing them with expressions such as “Hezbollah” and “fighters” was “aimed at brainwashing and stripping the party of its resistance identity.”

During a Cabinet session on Thursday, Morcos raised the issue of content circulating on social media that incites murder and sectarian strife. This comes against the backdrop of the war that Hezbollah waged from Lebanon against Israel on March 2, without state approval, which led to a sharp division in Lebanese public opinion.

Morcos, who is also Cabinet spokesperson, said after the session that what was being published “exceeds the bounds of freedom of opinion, the press and expression.”

Prime Minister Nawaf Salam considered it to fall under the penal code, specifically regarding crimes that harm national unity, he said, and that “we are against strife in all its forms.”

Morcos also urged journalists, influencers and social media users to remain aware of the sensitivity of the current situation and to avoid content that could provoke strife, hate speech or incitement.

He acknowledged, however, that, according to a legal study, he has no authority over social media, even on media-related matters.

“The Ministry of Information does not exercise a guardianship role and lacks judicial police powers,” he said.

“These authorities rest with the public prosecution offices, which are overseen by the minister of justice and fall within the domain of criminal law and criminal prosecution.”

The ban was agreed during a Cabinet session on March 2, after Hezbollah launched six rockets from Lebanese territory toward northern Israel, the first such attack since the November 2024 ceasefire, prompting retaliatory strikes.

The Cabinet reaffirmed that “the decision of war and peace rests exclusively with the Lebanese state and its constitutional institutions,” and called on Hezbollah to hand over its weapons to the state while limiting its role to political activity within the legal and constitutional framework.