Everything you need to know about Twitter Blue confusion

After a false start, late last year Twitter started to roll out Twitter Blue, a new subscription-based multicolored verification system for users on the platform. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 05 April 2023
Follow

Everything you need to know about Twitter Blue confusion

  • Elevated costs, missed promises, confusing color system contributed to Twitter verification chaos
  • Legacy users express disappointment at idea of being mistaken for Twitter Blue subscribers

LONDON: Since Twitter changed ownership last October, the platform has endured a profound and occasionally chaotic transformation.

The “Chief Twit,” as Twitter head Elon Musk described himself, and his team have introduced a number of radical changes over the course of six months in a bid to build an “alternative social media space.”

From drastic cost-cutting achieved by slashing half of Twitter’s workforce, to new features intended to generate income streams, Musk has sought to make Twitter profitable by ferrying it away from the classic social media advertisement-based revenue model.

After a false start, late last year Twitter started to roll out Twitter Blue, a new subscription-based multicolored verification system for users on the platform.

In a tweet, Elon Musk said the new system would help people better identify accounts, with gold ticks being assigned to business organizations, grey ticks to government-affiliated accounts or multilateral organizations, and blue ticks to individual accounts.

The company added that, as of April 1st, 2023, the new colored badges would effectively replace the so-called, blue-badged legacy accounts that were previously reserved for verified accounts of politicians, famous personalities, journalists and other public figures, unless they have subscribed to the Twitter Blue or Twitter Verified Organizations plan.

Twitter Blue was made available globally in late March, but people pointed out how the service lacks many of the features promised by the Tesla CEO.

The company’s announcement tweets list some of the benefits of Twitter Blue, such as a checkmark, the ability to write longer tweets, prioritized ranking in conversations, and half as many ads.

Those last two features, however, have not yet been released, and when users click on the links to sign up for the services, they are still marked as “Coming Soon.”

Subscription to Twitter Blue for individual accounts costs $8 per month via the web and $11 per month through in-app payment on iOS and Android, while subscription to its new Twitter Verified Organizations program costs businesses around $1,000 per month, plus $50 per month for each affiliated subaccount.

The elevated price tag, which may be considerably higher depending on where a user is located, led to an outcry on the internet and prompted several users to say they would be better off without any badge.

On Sunday, the New York Times became one of the first high-profile users to be stripped of its blue badge on Sunday after announcing that it would not pay for the service.

However, Saturday’s deadline to pay for blue checkmarks has passed, and the blue ticks still feature next to many users’ names.

Sources reported that Musk deleted a tweet saying that users would be given “a few weeks’ grace,” suggesting a gradual removal of the blue ticks.

However, according to internal Twitter documents cited by the New York Times, the platform could be planning a hybrid approach and exempt from the rules 10,000 of the most-followed users on Twitter.

Yet, this uncertainty has caused widespread confusion on Twitter, with users unable to differentiate between legacy accounts and Twitter Blue members.

Instead of taking away the blue checkmarks, Twitter on Sunday began appending a new message to profiles: “This account is verified because it’s subscribed to Twitter blue or is a legacy verified account.”

Many legacy verified Twitter users have expressed their disappointment at the idea of being mistaken for Twitter Blue subscribers.

“Nah man, just take it away. Don’t blanket me with those little Twitter blue wieners,” said Matt, Youtuber and co-host of GoonsPC, a popular comedy podcast.

The Guardian columnist Owen Jones suggested Twitter’s decision was based on the fact that for many users “Twitter Blue has become a mark of shame,” and asked how it is “going to work given soon verification will mean ‘I paid Elon Musk to use Twitter’ in all cases.”

While legacy account holders await clarification, Musk has continued making promises to lure users to Twitter Blue saying that after April 15, the “For You” algorithmic timeline will only show verified accounts along with the accounts a person follows.

Meanwhile, the social network is also reportedly working on a government ID verification feature for Twitter Blue subscribers, which will let them hide their badges.


BBC slammed for ‘shameful’ cut to ‘free Palestine’ comment at BAFTA Awards

Updated 24 February 2026
Follow

BBC slammed for ‘shameful’ cut to ‘free Palestine’ comment at BAFTA Awards

  • Broadcaster removes from broadcast part of filmmaker Akinola Davies Jr.’s acceptance speech at the British Academy Film Awards
  • Amnesty UK praises filmmaker for speaking up for those ‘facing and fleeing from persecution and mass atrocities’

LONDON: The BBC was accused on Monday of a “shameful” decision after it cut part of an acceptance speech at the previous night’s British Academy Film Awards in which a filmmaker uttered the phrase “free Palestine.”

British-Nigerian director and co-writer Akinola Davies Jr. and his brother, co-writer Wale Davies were collecting the award for outstanding debut by a British writer, director or producer for their film “My Father’s Shadow” when the former made the comment.

The BBC chose not to include the final part of his speech when it broadcast the BAFTAs ceremony later in the evening. However, the corporation did broadcast an inadvertent racist slur shouted by a person with Tourette syndrome while Black actors Michael B. Jordan and Delroy Lindo were presenting an award.

Akinola thanked industry figures and family for their support as he accepted the award, before dedicating it to “all those whose parents migrated to obtain a better life for their children.”

In the final part of his speech, cut by the BBC, he said: “To the economic migrant, the conflict migrant, those under occupation, dictatorship, persecution and those experiencing genocide, you matter and your stories matter more than ever.

“Your dreams are an act of resistance. To those watching at home, archive your loved ones, archive your stories yesterday, today and forever. For Nigeria, for London, Congo, Sudan, free Palestine. Thank you.”

The BBC, which broadcast the ceremony with a two-hour time delay, said the cut was made for timing reasons.

A spokesperson told Deadline: “The live event is three hours, and it has to be reduced to two hours for its on-air slot. The same happened to other speeches made during the night, and all edits were made to ensure the program was delivered to time. All winners’ speeches will be available to watch via BAFTA’s YouTube Channel.”

Human rights campaign group Amnesty UK described the decision by the BBC to cut part of the speech as “shameful.”

It added: “Thank you Akinola Davies Jr. for using your platform to speak out for the rights of migrants and people facing and fleeing from persecution and mass atrocities, from the Congo to Sudan to Palestine.”

In June last year, the BBC was at the center of a row after it broadcast a Glastonbury Festival performance by the duo Bob Vylan, during which the lead singer chanted “death to the IDF” in protest against the Israeli Defense Forces’ assault on Gaza.