Karachi’s top police surgeon who has seen it all tells other women: ‘Don’t give up’

Dr. Summaiya Syed, a police medical examiner, is seen working at her office in Karachi, Pakistan, on March 7, 2023. (AN Photo)
Short Url
Updated 08 March 2023
Follow

Karachi’s top police surgeon who has seen it all tells other women: ‘Don’t give up’

  • Dr. Summaiya Syed was appointed head of Sindh’s medico-legal department in Pakistan’s largest city in June last year
  • Syed has faced many hardships, including sexual harassement, during a decades-long career as a police medical examiner

KARACHI: Dr. Summaiya Syed has faced many hardships, including sexual and psychological harassment, during a decades-long career as a police medical examiner in Pakistan’s southern Sindh province.

But the difficulties have all paid off.

In June last year, Syed was appointed the top police surgeon in Karachi, Pakistan’s largest city, heading a medico-legal department in which she has herself seen many ups and downs in a career spanning almost 30 years.

Today, her message for other women on International Women’s Day is simple: “Don’t give up.”

“Giving up was not, never an option for me, never an option,” Syed, 50, told Arab News in an interview in Karachi. 

“I have faced my own share of threats, my own share of blackmailings, my own share of physical harassment, sexual harassment, psychological harassment ... I’ve faced it all, as a woman medico-legal officer, as a senior woman medico-legal officer, as [an] additional police surgeon.”




This picture taken in Karachi, Pakistan, on March 7, 2023, captures a list of names that mentions the previous occupants of Dr Summaiya Syed’s office, showing the top medico-legal officials in the city were mostly men in the past. The only woman appointed to the post in December 2015 spent only 17 days on the job, making Syed the longest-serving woman police surgeon in Karachi. (AN Photo)

Syed qualified as a doctor in 1996 and joined the Sindh health department as a “medico-legal officer,” the term for a medical examiner who conducts autopsies and investigates the cause and manner of death and injuries at government hospitals.

It was a profession few women chose at the time but Syed says she has never looked back.

Before Syed, only one other woman was appointed the police surgeon in Karachi, in December 2015, but spent only 17 days on the job, making Syed the longest-serving woman police surgeon in Karachi. Now, among her aims as a leader in her field is to fix gender imbalances in the medico-legal department as well as the health industry in general.

Karachi, a city of over 15 million people, currently has only 29 medico-legal officers, of which just seven are women, a figure Syed said was “not at all compatible” with the number of women victims of assault.

Last year, health facilities reported 626 cases of sexual assault on women and children. Among over 34,000 people who were brought to the police for examination in various cases, 5,325 were women.

“We are getting around 20 cases of women and children per day [at Abbasi Shaheed hospital], maybe one or two female dead bodies as well,” Syed said, referring to one of Karachi’s largest public hospitals.

“But I just have one WMLO [woman medico-legal officer] over there. So that is not at all compatible.”

One way in which Syed tries to tackle the problem is by making her department more accessible, especially by being available herself through social media.  

“People contact me out of the blue that their case is not being addressed or they’re waiting for some kind of, you know, treatment or medical legal documentation, they contact me directly,” she said.

“We are not turning away women who don’t come with police letters, we don’t turn back children whose parents are not bringing police letters.”  

And under Syed, the Karachi police medico-legal department has also started assessing victims of sexual assaults based on their psychological condition, which was not practiced previously.

According to Syed, sexual assault affects all three modalities — physical, sexual and psychological — of a victim.  

“We only were previously concerned with sexual [trauma], but now we talk about physical injuries as well,” she said. “And we talk about psychological trauma.”

Anti-rape crisis cells set up by the Sindh government last year to provide medico-legal certificates, psychological support and legal services to sexual abuse victims would now have a full-time psychologist available for trauma victims, Syed said, including those who had been through “intimate partner violence,” which involves physical and sexual violence, stalking and psychological aggression by a spouse.

“This was a groundbreaking thing,” Syed said. “And I’m extremely proud to have been a part of it.”

Along her journey, the doctor said, she was supported by family, especially her father and husband.

And though she was thankful for this, she added:

“Even if the men in your life are not allowing you to fly, you should still fly.”

In her office, a poster hanging on the wall read: “Don’t make me walk when I want to fly.”


Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

Updated 7 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan Supreme Court halts trial of prominent lawyer over alleged anti-military tweets

  • Top court orders lower court to pause proceedings after lawyers allege due-process breaches
  • Mazari-Hazir, husband face charges under cybercrime law that carry up to 14 years in prison

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Thursday halted the cybercrime trial of prominent human rights lawyer Imaan Mazari-Hazir and her husband, Hadi Ali Chattha, after their lawyers argued that a lower court had recorded witness testimony in their absence, violating due-process rules.

Mazari-Hazir, one of Pakistan’s most outspoken civil liberties lawyers, and Chattha are being prosecuted under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (PECA) over posts on X that authorities say incited ethnic divisions and portrayed the military as involved in “terrorism.” Both reject the allegations. If convicted under the relevant PECA provision, they face a prison term of up to 14 years.

The case has drawn broad attention in Pakistan’s legal community because Mazari-Hazir, who has been repeatedly detained over her criticism of the security establishment, argues that the trial court ignored basic procedural guarantees despite her medical leave request. The case also comes as Pakistan faces sustained scrutiny over the use of PECA against activists, journalists and political dissenters, with lawyers arguing that lower courts often move ahead without meeting minimum fair-trial standards.

The couple’s lawyer, Riasat Ali Azad, said his clients filed a petition in the Supreme Court because the lower court had moved ahead improperly.

“Today, the Supreme Court of Pakistan has stayed the lower court proceedings, the trial court proceedings and has said that the [Islamabad] High Court should decide our pending revision petition for which a date has already been fixed,” he told reporters.

Azad said the violation was clear under Pakistan’s Code of Criminal Procedure, which requires evidence to be recorded in the presence of the accused.

“Yet, on that very day, evidence of four witnesses was recorded in their absence, and a state counsel was appointed to conduct cross-examination on their behalf,” he said. “All these things are against the right to a fair trial under Articles 10 and 10-A.”

A three-judge bench led by Justice Muhammad Hashim Khan Kakar ordered the trial court to pause proceedings and instructed the Islamabad High Court to hear the couple’s pending criminal revision petition first.

The trial had been scheduled to resume on Dec.15, but the Supreme Court’s stay now freezes proceedings before both the additional sessions judge and the special PECA court. 

The Islamabad High Court is expected to hear the criminal revision petition next week.

Chattha, who is also a lawyer, said the SC ruling underscored the need for procedural safeguards.

“It is a victory for the constitution and the law,” he said, arguing that the trial court had ignored their request to re-record witness statements in their presence.