The significance of Imam Mohammed bin Saud’s move from Ghasibah to At-Tarafiyyah in Diriyah

1 / 3
2 / 3
3 / 3
Short Url
Updated 22 February 2023
Follow

The significance of Imam Mohammed bin Saud’s move from Ghasibah to At-Tarafiyyah in Diriyah

  • Ghasibah was the first governing district and a hub of education, agriculture and good livelihood for hundreds of years
  • Imam Muhammad bin Saud resided in At-Tarafiyyah with family until the end of his reign

RIYADH: When people reflect on the Kingdom’s timeline, many tend to overlook the importance of the Ghasibah district and its position as the center of the ruling Al-Saud family for around 300 years.

This was even before the UNESCO World Heritage site of At-Turaif in Diriyah was established as the governing seat in 1766 AD.

“The district is one of the oldest places, witnessing the Saudi families’ assumption of power 600 years ago, following the establishment of the First Saudi State,” Dr. Badran Al-Honaihen, associate director of historical research and studies at the Diriyah Gate Development Authority, told Arab News.

Ghasibah was the seat of government between the era of Prince Mani' Al-Muraydi and the early days of Imam Mohammed bin Saud’s reign

Diriyah had five districts: Ghasibah, At-Tarafiyyah, Al-Murayih, Al-Qusairen and At-Turaif.

Ghasibah was located in the northeastern region of Diriyah, on top of a plateau surrounded by Wadi Hanifa.

“Ghasibah became the core of Diriyah and the center of government, and it played a prominent role in protecting convoys of pilgrimage and trade passing through its areas,” Badran said.

Ghasibah was the first seat of government; once Diriyah established the First Saudi State the city became a hub for education, agriculture and an overall better livelihood.

“When Diriyah became the capital of the First Saudi State, the number of immigrants increased, and this greatly affected the composition of modern society, which required moving the center of power from Ghasibah to At-Tarafiyyah in a short time to At-Turaif district,” Badran said.

The 18th century saw a flood of new migrants to the Ghasibah and bordering areas, leading to the move from Ghasibah to At-Tarafiyyah and eventually At-Turaif.

“As a result of overpopulation, the state moved to At-Tarafiyyah, which is one of the finest neighborhoods of Diriyah,” the historian said.

The transition from Ghasibah to At-Tarafiyyah was an important segment in the Kingdom’s timeline as it highlighted how successful Diriyah was.

“Many new residential neighborhoods emerged after Ghasibah became overcrowded, such as At-Tarafiyyah, which holds evidence suggesting the greatness of Imam Muhammad bin Saud’s reign,” Badran said.

After Diriyah flourished and its population increased, the district of Ghasibah filled up with people. Imam Mohammad bin Saud moved from Ghasibah to At-Tarafiyyah, a part of Samhan, located on the eastern bank of Wadi Hanifa, south of Ghasibah.
   
“In the early days of the First Saudi State, the (royal) family moved from Ghasibah to At-Tarafiyyah. Imam Mohammed bin Saud resided in At-Tarafiyyah until the end of his reign, which consisted of nearly 40 years of reform and educational, social, cultural and political successes,” Badran said.

“Ghasibah's strategic location made it one of the most prominent fortified places that contributed to the defense of Diriyah,” he said.

“Ghasibah had its own stories, around the end of the First Saudi State, the period of resilience and the defense of Diriyah, the palace of Prince Saud bin Abdullah bin Saud bin Abdulaziz, the grandson of Imam Saud. He had a historical palace and was famous for his courage and resilience, along with a number of Bani Hanifa members in Ghasibah.”

Some of the most prominent stories about Ghasibah concern its doors.

“Najd’s palaces are known to have Diriyah-style doors. Such doors were made out of tamarisk wood and had many architectural details. But the door of Prince Saud bin Abdullah’s palace was made out of iron. It astonished both locals and armies invading Diriyah, and specifically Ghasibah.”

According to the Diriyah historian, Imam Mohammed bin Saud’s grandson, Imam Saud bin Abdulaziz (the great), wanted to confirm the Saudi state’s connection with Ghasibah.

“He (Imam Saud bin Abdulaziz) built a great palace in Ghasibah to be another home for him if he wanted to leave At-Turaif and change the place. He made an iron gate for the palace, and it was one of the greatest forts in the region,” Badran said.

The name “Ghasibah” was mentioned for the first time in historical sources following the settlement of Prince Mani' Al-Muraydi and his Murada clan from Drou' in Diriyah in the year 1446

“Perhaps the reason for naming it ‘Ghasibah’ is taken from the meaning of the name itself, which indicates the quality of a thing that is taken by force or compulsion, or is a sign of the neighborhood’s invulnerability and immunity,” Badran said.

“Prince Saad, son of Imam Abdullah bin Saud, barricaded himself in it with the residents of the neighborhood and defended it with a heroic defense. Ibrahim Pasha could not storm it until after he launched a violent attack on it, forcing Prince Saad to surrender,” he said.

Ibrahim Pasha, the commander of the invading forces, then took the wounded and injured to the palace in Ghasibah because of its forts, capacity and abundance of rooms.

Today, there are merely structural remains left in Ghasibah. These highlight the strength of its walls and the role they played in the Kingdom’s history.


UAE’s Sheikh Tahnoon ‘welcome anytime’: Saudi media minister

Saudi Minister of Media Salman Al-Dossary (L) and Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed Al-Nahyan (R). (Supplied)
Updated 12 sec ago
Follow

UAE’s Sheikh Tahnoon ‘welcome anytime’: Saudi media minister

  • Sheikh Tahnoon “comes to the Kingdom whenever he wants without permission; it is his home and its leadership is his family,” the Kingdom’s media minister wrote on X

RIYADH: Saudi Arabia’s Media Minister Salman Al-Dossary refuted on Wednesday allegations circulating on social media that the Kingdom has denied entry to the UAE’s National Security Adviser Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed.
“What is being circulated about the Kingdom refusing to receive His Highness Sheikh Tahnoon bin Zayed is incorrect. His Highness comes to the Kingdom whenever he wants without permission; it is his home and its leadership is his family,” the minister wrote on X.
Sheikh Tahnoon is the Deputy Ruler of Abu Dhabi and brother of the UAE’s President Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed.
Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan said on Tuesday that while there had been a “difference of view” between the two countries over Yemen, their relationship was “critically important” for regional stability.
“The Kingdom is always keen on having a strong, positive relationship with the UAE as an important partner within the GCC,” he said.
He said the UAE’s withdrawal from Yemen served as a “building block” for the relationship with the Emirates to continue strong.
Last month, Yemen’s internationally recognized government asked the UAE to withdraw its forces from the country after the separatist Southern Transitional Council (STC) that it supported seized large areas in the south and east.
The Saudi-led military Coalition to Support Legitimacy in Yemen said on December 30 that it had conducted a “limited” airstrike against shipments of smuggled weapons destined to the STC.
The UAE defense ministry said it completed a full withdrawal from Yemen on January 2.