Time running out to tackle climate change: US envoy

US Presidential Envoy for Climate John Kerry (R) delivers a speech at the Cong (Screenshot)
Short Url
Updated 17 January 2023
Follow

Time running out to tackle climate change: US envoy

DAVOS: US climate envoy John Kerry on Tuesday said that time was running out for the world to tackle climate change.

And the special presidential ambassador was not convinced that a low-carbon global economy would be achieved in time to avoid the worst impact for some of the most vulnerable people.

In a session addressing philanthropy funding toward a global climate action plan, Kerry pointed out that an immediate response along with “money, money, money” was required to deliver results.

“Massive funding is needed, and there is no way it works without the partnership between private sector and governments,” he added.

Only 2 percent of global philanthropy currently goes toward climate action plans, a figure Kerry said needed to increase.

Session panel members agreed with a decision made at last year’s Climate Change Conference (COP 27) in Egypt to protect 30 percent of nature by 2030, but they noted that increased philanthropy funding was much needed to help implement climate-friendly solutions.

Egyptian Minister of International Cooperation Rania Al-Mashat, said: “For a greater impact it’s important to bring the three Ps’ money together, public, private, and philanthropy money, as it will be a catalyst toward mitigation and adaptation.”

During the session, the minister explained an Egyptian government finance initiative launched at COP 27 aimed at stimulating climate-related financing and developing an international framework for innovative funding.

Panellist Badr Jafar, chief executive officer of UAE-headquartered global conglomerate Crescent Enterprises, said most of the focus for this year’s COP 28 gathering in the Emirates was currently on creating a firm bond between the public, private, and civil society sectors to find more innovative solutions toward greener economies.

And, he added, the public and private sectors needed to work together to better harness the power of catalytic philanthropy to close a $100 trillion gap for equitable climate and nature solutions.


Global trade isn’t deglobalizing — it’s reshuffling, Harvard economist says

Updated 09 February 2026
Follow

Global trade isn’t deglobalizing — it’s reshuffling, Harvard economist says

ALULA: Global trade is not retreating into deglobalization despite geopolitical shocks, but is instead undergoing a structural reshuffling led by US-China tensions, according to Harvard University economist Pol Antras. 

Presenting research at the AlUla Emerging Market Economies Conference, Antras said there is no evidence that countries are systematically turning inward. Instead, trade flows are being redirected across markets, creating winners and losers depending on export structure and exposure to Chinese competition. 

This comes as debate intensifies over whether supply-chain disruptions, industrial policy and rising trade barriers signal the end of globalization after decades of expansion. 

Speaking to Arab News on the sidelines of the event, Antras said: “I think the right way to view it is more a reorganization, where things are moving from some countries to others rather than a general trend where countries are becoming more inward looking, in a sense of producers selling more of their stuff domestically than internationally, or consumers buying more domestic products than foreign products.”  

He said a change of that scale has not yet happened, which is important to recognize when navigating the reshuffling — a shift his research shows is driven by Chinese producers redirecting sales away from the US toward other economies. 

He added that countries are affected differently, but highlighted that the Kingdom’s position is relatively positive, stating: “In the case of Saudi Arabia, for instance, its export structure, what it exports, is very different than what China exports, so in that sense it’s better positioned so suffer less negative consequences of recent events.” 

He went on to say that economies likely to be more negatively impacted than the Kingdom would be those with more producers in sectors exposed to Chinese competition. He added that while many countries may feel inclined to follow the United States’ footsteps by implementing their own tariffs, he would advise against such a move.  

Instead, he pointed to supporting producers facing the shock as a better way to protect and prepare economies, describing it as a key step toward building resilience — a view Professor Antras underscored as fundamental. 

Elaborating on the Kingdom’s position amid rising tensions and structural reorganization, he said Saudi Arabia holds a relative advantage in its economic framework. 

“Saudi Arabia should not be too worried about facing increased competitive pressures in selling its exports to other markets, by its nature. On the other hand, there is a benefit of the current situation, which is when Chinese producers find it hard to sell in US market, they naturally pivot to other markets.” 

He said that pivot could benefit importing economies, including Saudi Arabia, by lowering Chinese export prices. The shift could increase the Kingdom’s import volumes from China while easing cost pressures for domestic producers.